Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

115 gr 9mm lacking penetration?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Ben86, Sep 10, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ben86

    Ben86 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,185
    Location:
    MS, USA
    I keep hearing that the 115 grain 9mm lacks penetration. It seems to perform fine to me. I like it because it has the most kinetic energy of the three main 9mm bullet weights. Should I switch to 124 grain?
     
  2. AndyC

    AndyC Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,581
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    115 gr FMJ penetrates just fine - in fact, it tends to over-penetrate on humans.
     
  3. tinygnat219

    tinygnat219 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,939
    Location:
    The Land of Northern Hospitality and Southern Effi
    Huh? Where'd you hear that it has problems penetrating? If anything, the FMJ rounds penetrate TOO far...
     
  4. Beagle-zebub

    Beagle-zebub Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    The OP didn't say they were FMJ.
     
  5. BattleChimp Potemkin

    BattleChimp Potemkin Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    529
    Location:
    Indianapolis IN
    From a JHP situation, there are some very aggressive 115 designs that can open very quickly. The gelatin I used to horse with showed that Corbon (using the Sierra powerjacket, but also handloads using the Powerjacket) and Winchester standard 115grainers open very quickly and tend to penetrate far less than heavier or less aggressive designs. Not sure about underpenetration, but the results WERE unimpressive compared to 115gr. Gold Dots and specifically: the Hornady 115gr. XTP. This one goes deep, however tended to be confounded easier by denim in our tests.

    Heavier bullets (with the exception from what I saw of the Sierras, handloaded or Corbon) tended to penetrate better.

    The days of the Hi-Speed rounds (like the old Triton designs using Sierras) are limited, as designs using 90gr. bullets are remissed to either history or specific "low penetration" loads. This also includes handloads using .380 weight bullets. However, one that I did like (albeit fragmentory, but like Corbon isnt :D ) was a 102 gr. Golden Sabre on top of a hefty dose of 3N37. It penetrated well and left a trail of brass behind it :D.

    ETA: I am not biased against Sierra, in fact they are my favorite for my reduced penetration .40 HD loads! :)
     
  6. M2 Carbine

    M2 Carbine Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2003
    Messages:
    6,985
    Location:
    Texas
    Not hardly.

    There's a video called "Deadly Effects" which shows actual results from handgun shootings (definitely not G rated).

    There's a morgue picture of a bad guy that was shot forty three (yes 43) times with a popular 9mm JHP bullet of the day.
    He appears to be a good size man and most of the bullets went clean through him. From the picture you can see over twenty 9mm exit holes.
    The guy continued fighting until brought down with a couple 12ga slugs.


    Personally, I tried some of the wet telephone book penetration tests.

    JHP 45ACP only penetrated these phone books 2 1/4 inches.

    9mm 115gr FMJ and S&B JHP went clean through the books and it appears the bullets were still traveling pretty fast leaving the books.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. rklessdriver

    rklessdriver Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    926
    Location:
    NOVA
    115gr Federal 9BP and the +P+9BPLE both show very good penetration for self defense. This round is the STANDARD by which all other 9mm rounds are judged. The US Border Patrol used it for ever and was most happy with its performance in real life (or should I say, at causing real death).

    In these test 9BPLE went past 15" and exhibited some fragmentation.

    http://shootersforum.com/printthread.htm?t=19242&pp=15&page=3

    This data taken from "Stopping Power" shows 9BPLE going to 13.9" and data for few other top performers in the 9mm world at the time (including the coveted Winchester Ranger T 127 +P).

    http://forum.bodybuilding.com/archive/index.php?t-1240821.html

    Both the most modern Corbon 115DPX and even the old "Walmart Special" WWWB 115JHP went to just over/almost 14" of penetration.

    http://www.brassfetcher.com/Hollowpoint Versus FMJ.html

    In summary:
    Your not giving up anything by using proven or the modern 115gr 9mm's. Any of these rounds Center Mass will get the job done.
    Will
     
  8. KBintheSLC

    KBintheSLC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,197
    Location:
    Stalingrad, USA
    If you are talking FMJ, there should be no lack of penetration. However, 115 gr JHP tend to hit with more energy and velocity, opening more rapidly, and penetrating less than their heavier counterparts.

    I personally find the 124 gr JHP's to be the best compromise between expansion and penetration. For very deep penetration, use standard velocity 147 gr JHP. They open slowly, and dig deep.
     
  9. Rampant_Colt

    Rampant_Colt Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    396
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    Never choose your handgun SD cartridge based on its muzzle energy

    Illinois State Police used the +p+ 115gr JHP for many years with good results before switching to 180gr Winchester Ranger T from a Glock 22
     
  10. Steve C

    Steve C Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,640
    If you look at the available penetration data on 115 gr jhp bullets, all the standard velocity rounds from full size service pistols will penetrate the magic 12" or greater but when put in shorter barrels of 4" or less the penetration slips to just under 12".

    +P+ loads all penetrate over the 12" depth.

    The current Law Enforcement surplus Federal 115gr +P+ ammo that's currently available for a relatively economic price has a long standing reputation as a top notch round for stopping power.
     
  11. Ben86

    Ben86 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,185
    Location:
    MS, USA
    This place is great, you get so many good responses so quickly!

    I should have specified JHP, sorry. I tend to think that penetration, of the same caliber, is more dependent on bullet design rather than weight, but I've been seeking second opinions.

    I've recently bought a Glock 26 and haven't made up my mind yet on my 9mm carry round. Right now I just have it loaded with rem umc 115 gr jhps. They are pretty decent, they expand beautifully and penetrate 8" in wet newspaper from the G26. But I know I need to carry premium ammo and stop being so cheap.

    Would +P loads be best for a sub-compact because they will help with the loss of velocity? And for that matter do +p loads offer a boost in stopping power worth the added wear/recoil?

    And why not choose a load based on kinetic energy? The transfer of kinetic energy plays a role in stopping power doesn't it?

    And where can I find this deadly effects video?
     
  12. DeadHorrorFan

    DeadHorrorFan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    51
    Location:
    Lafayette, LA
    If I'm carrying a 9mm it's loaded with 147 grain Winchester Rangers. If I'm plinking it's with 115 gr. FMJ. They are noticeably faster (read more penetration) on certain targets I use, but I wouldn't fear to load them into a personal protection gun.

    I wouldn't like to get shot with either of them....
     
  13. Ben86

    Ben86 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,185
    Location:
    MS, USA
    Either one would ruin your day! But as a hunter I have noticed a huge difference in stopping power between expanding and non-expanding bullets. Expanding bullets cut the time it takes to incap. with a chest wound in half, or more.
     
  14. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    once the round leaves the body lawsuits happen..

    115 HP serve me well..
     
  15. Halo

    Halo Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Messages:
    728
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC & part time in the beautiful Blue Ri
    I'd like to know too.
     
  16. rklessdriver

    rklessdriver Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    926
    Location:
    NOVA
  17. Loosedhorse

    Loosedhorse member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    eastern Massachusetts
    This is the famous FBI myth

    For those that don't know, read and learn:

    On April 11, 1986, 8 FBI Agents in 5 cars tried a felony stop on two suspect that they believed were bankrobbers, murderers, and armed with semi-auto rifles. However, the poor tactics they used used that day suggest that the Agents expected that, once confronted, the suspects would just give up. They did not.

    The gun battle lasted about nine minutes with about 144 rounds fired, leaving 2 agents dead (G-d rest them), and 5 Agents wounded (3 grievously); the two suspects were also killed.

    Both suspects were wounded in the initial exchange of gunfire. The first suspect took a bullet that fractured his skull, and took him out of the fight. The second suspect was also wounded in the first moments:

    This, it turns out, was a fatal wound (he would have bled to death)--but not immediately fatal. All of the damage done to the FBI agents by gunfire was done by this suspect AFTER he took that bullet to the arm and chest.

    The FBI, rather than focus (initially) on the poor tactics, seized on the fact that if this 115 gr 9 mm Silvertip HP had just gone one inch farther, the fight would have been over. Therefore, the bullet that had perforated the arm and then passed perhaps 8 inches into the chest from the side, had underpenetrated. Of course.

    This began the ammo-upgrade search that eventually gave us the 10 mm SW pistol and the .40 cartridge.

    So, there's your underpenetrating 9 mm!

    (Quotation found at: http://www.firearmstactical.com/briefs7.htm )
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2008
  18. Old Grump

    Old Grump Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    410
    Location:
    Blue River Wisconsin
    If muzzle energy were the criteria I would sell my 45 and stay with my 41 mag but its not the criteria. 115 is good put in the proper spot, bigger gives you a 'little' more leeway but shot placement is always critical, even for my beloved 45. Best insurance is to remember bigger is almost always better. 124 over 115 is my subjective opinion and its the only 9MM bullet I buy. If you cannot handle or do not like the bigger guns like the 40, 10MM or the 45 then at least get the biggest bullet you can fire reliably in your pistol. Shock value counts for a lot when you are trying to put down a determined adrenaline charged man. Thats why a lot of people don't look past a 12 gauge. On the +P question the little bit of gain in velocity is more than offset by more muzzle flash and noise. Neither is conducive to rapid acquisition of the sights for a second shot and only marginal in increased effectiveness in a short barreled gun.
     
  19. KBintheSLC

    KBintheSLC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,197
    Location:
    Stalingrad, USA
    I would use +P in your G26... I always carry +P in my 26 to compensate for the short barrel. I would use the kind that incorporates flash surpressors in the powder, like Golden Saber or equivalent.

    Also, if you are concerned about price for premium ammo, just load up your gun with the top end stuff, and use cheap JHP for your spare mags.

    Choosing ammo only on energy means ignoring other important issues like penetration. If it was only energy we looked at, then Glaser or Xtreme Shock ammo would be the top choice. But those ultra light, super fast bullets make a very nasty and very shallow wound channel that does not work so well in real life.
    The perfect bullet has balance between velocity, weight, and expansion. If the bullet is skewed to any extreme in any of these categories, it loses effectiveness.
     
  20. rklessdriver

    rklessdriver Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    926
    Location:
    NOVA
    The FBI Miami shoot out happen 20yrs ago and is often sited as a result of the 9mm's lack of killing power. Unfortunatly it dosen't mean squat when taken in the contex of modern 9mm 115gr ammunition. This is a single incident that happend 20yrs ago. Hardly anything to hang your hat on as far as determining the effectivness of modern 115gr 9mm ammo.

    William Russell Matix and Michael Platt were both highly trained former Soldiers (Matix had been a military policeman, while Platt had served as a Ranger). They were highly driven individuals who had superior fire power and training. They used it to great effect here. They were armed with a Ruger Mini 14, a 12 gauge, and an assortment of pistols, while the agents were armed with one 12 gauge, a few revolvers and a few S&W 9mm auto pistols.

    Specifically it was one round of the Winchester 115gr Silvertip that "failed to penetrate" from an impact under Platt's arm pit (after it went through his arm). A second 9mm round did hit his lung and was infact a killing wound but it took a little while before he would have succombed to it.

    Interesting to note that the .38 +P 158gr LHP was also used in the combat and also failed to end the situation as Matix was shot 2 times through the windshield of their car by an agent with a Smith model 36, knocking him out. He woke up and started fighting again...

    These guys at least started a bunch of ammunition research in the firearms world, but by no means are they what's going to happen in every shoot out situation. The rounds I cited (Federal 9BPLE and Winchester Ranger T) are a direct result of the research that came from this shoot out.

    All this shoot out tells you is if your in a shoot out with 2 former Army Rangers who out gun you, the Winchester 115gr Silvertip is a bad 9mm ammo choice.
    Will
     
  21. Pat-inCO

    Pat-inCO Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    591
    Direct quote from the FBI evaluation of the 10mm (Yes 10mm).
    Page 9 of the
    FBI 10mm Notes
    SSA Urey W. Patrick, Firearms Training Unit
    FBI Academy, Quantico, VA


    Are you saying the 9mm is no good?

    * No. We are saying it is as good as a .38 Special, which has served
    us for a long time. It has severe limitations, which we are not willing
    to accept. It is woefully inadequate for shooting at people in cars,
    for example, and over half of our shootings involve vehicles. It is a
    marginally adequate wounding agent. We have a number of 9mm shootings
    over the past couple of years, and if you define a good shooting as one
    in which the subject stops whatever he was doing when he gets shot, we
    have yet to have a good one, and we are hitting our adversaries multiple
    times. We have shot half a dozen dogs in the past year and have not
    killed one yet, although we have run up a significant veterinary bill.
    The 9mm with proper ammunition is not a bad round. It is just
    nowhere near as effective as the 10mm and .45 offerings, and the
    disparity between it and the larger calibers has remained a constant
    throughout all the testing we have done over the past two years.

    From another source that recommends using "Momentum between 20 and 30":

    9mm, 115 gr @ 1155 fps, Momentum = 19.0 lb-f/s - Muzzle Energy = 341ft lbs
    9mm, 124 gr @ 1120 fps, Momentum = 19.8 lb-f/s - Muzzle Energy = 345 ft lbs
    9mm, 147 gr @ 990 fps, Momentum = 20.8 lb-f/s - Muzzle Energy = 320 ft lbs

    45 ACP, 185 gr @ 1000 fps, Momentum = 26.4 lb-f/s - Muzzle Energy = 411 ft lbs
    45 ACP, 200 gr @ 940 fps, Momentum = 26.9 lb-f/s - Muzzle Energy = 393 ft lbs
    45 ACP, 230 gr @ 850 fps, Momentum = 27.9 lb-f/s - Muzzle Energy = 369 ft lbs
     
  22. JERRY

    JERRY Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Messages:
    2,349
    if youre having to shoot through car doors and windshields and steel doors in the projects, then id want something heavier than a 115gr.

    but for the general encounter of self defense it is fine.

    just remeber, if you get a h.p. round that is supposed to open up quickly and it does so, dont complain like the F.B.I. did because it didnt penetrate as well as a round with a delayed expansion design.
     
  23. isp2605

    isp2605 Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,333
    That is correct.
    At the time of Miami the FBI was talking that the best rd for defense was rapid expansion/limited penetration. They had all the technical figures with their computer man and the RII formula. They were just as adamant for the rapid expansion/limited penetration as they later were for deep penetration/expansion is secondary. It was a pendulum for them. They went from one extreme to the other. And which ever way their pendulum swung they had formulas and "proof" to prove either of their points. They weren't listening to those agencies who were actually using the rds on the street. The FBI is actually engaged in very few shootings. In fact it is very rare. Also, they don't investigate police shootings. They might pull a few reports and then live vicariously what other agencies investigate but they're not out there when the smell of gunpowder is still in the air or at the autopsies recovering bullets. They might ask for a report months/years later. But at the time they had their tests and they were preaching rapid expansion/limited penetration.
    My agency issued the 115 gr Silvertip (same as was used in Miami) in 1980 for just a couple of months. Then we had our first shooting with it. The BG was a biker wearing a leather vest over a leather jacket. He was hit 13 times COM with the Silvertip and none of the rds penetrated deep enough to hit vitals. We immediately switched to Federal 115 BP. A few years later the FBI decided they were going to the 9mm. They told everyone that their computer man and RII showed the 115 Silvertip was the perfect 9mm rd. A couple of our range guys loaded up our shooting data and the case file from our 1980 shooting and visited the range boys at Quantico. Our guys were basically told to go back home, that our shooting was an anomaly because the FBI's computer man and the RII showed the 115 Silvertip was the best choice.
    Then came Miami and the FBI found out what we had learned nearly 6 years earlier and what our range guys had tried to tell them. Unfortunately it was a costly lesson for them.
    My agency worked with Federal to develop the 115 BPLE and then later with W-W to develop the 115 +P+. There was nothing wrong with the Federal BPLE it's just that W-W (Olin) is an IL company and W-W was really pushing all they could to get our business. Both the BPLE and the W-W +P+ worked very well for us for many years. I investigated and supervised quite a few shootings with those rds. They worked going thru windshields, car body/doors, and all kinds of clothing.
     
  24. Pat-inCO

    Pat-inCO Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    591
  25. JERRY

    JERRY Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Messages:
    2,349
    isp spelled it out nicely with some fine examples of 115grainers doing a good job.

    off the shelf "wal-mart stuff" like wwb is fine for "normal" uses, but for police work you should use something heavier unless you get the designs made for barrier issues.

    there are plenty of good 115gr loads out there but not all are made to l.e. standards. choose wisely.

    for private citizen ccw the 115gr. STHP would be fine with me. in my duty gun it would not be.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page