Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.17 vs .22 for self defense?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by PROUDADDY, Dec 15, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PROUDADDY

    PROUDADDY Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1
    I am considering a NAA mini-revolver in either .17hmr or .22hmr as an ankle/pocket/BUG. I've only been able to find posts and data related to rifles and small game hunting.

    I am concerned with which might offer the most damaging wound- with and without penetrating clothing layers (obviously at reach out and touch someone distances).

    Thanks.
     
  2. rustymaggot

    rustymaggot Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    Messages:
    838
    try to find gelatin tests for both and take the one that averages the deepest penetration. why not .22lr? aguilla sss ammo averages 9 inches penetration.
     
  3. Lonestar

    Lonestar Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    701
    Rusty has a point, Out of a small barrel the .22wmr loses a lot of its power, you only gain between 100 to 200 fps with a .22wmr vs a high Velocity .22lr. You will also get reduced muzzle flash & noise. The .17 ??? sure its fast but it is alot lighter and smaller that a .22 round, it has problems stopping animals bigger that a squirrel and ammo isn't cheap.
     
  4. hossdaniels

    hossdaniels Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Messages:
    361
    Location:
    nc
    .22 hands down. the 17 is too damn light for anything but range fun and little bitty critters.
     
  5. ronto

    ronto Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    639
    Location:
    Smack Dab in the Middle of Nowhere.
    Forget about the 17 and firing a 22 Magnum from a short barrel is just turning good money into noise. The 22 Magnum was designed to be used in a long gun. Given the choices you presented, a 22LR would be the way to go. However, the 22LR is a very,very poor choice for self defense even as a back-up. There are very small .380's on the market that would be better for a "back-up" but not for "primary" self-defense. I wouldn't have anything less than a 9MM semi-auto or a 38 Special+P revolver for primary self defense. Just my $.02.
     
  6. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,287
    Location:
    TN
    The 17 is too frangible and it is very light. 22 WMR is too noisy and better in a rifle. 22LR is the way to go. I would choose CCI solids.
     
  7. rustymaggot

    rustymaggot Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    Messages:
    838
    22-rimfire,

    why cci solids? what depth do they get to in gelatin tests?
     
  8. ronto

    ronto Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    639
    Location:
    Smack Dab in the Middle of Nowhere.
  9. GaryP

    GaryP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    755
    Location:
    USA
    Per Cooper "reach out and touch someone distances" are the domain of long guns. :D

    I carry a NAA Black Widow with a .22WMR Cylinder in place as my BUG. Yes, that extra 200fps over .22LR does make a difference at barrel in nostril range.

    A NAA mini in .22 WMR or .22 LR or .17 HMR or .17 MACH 2 (in that order as a BUG) is a HUGE improvement over Finger Nails when Primary is out of action and things get up Close and Personal! :uhoh:

    :evil:
     
  10. Heavy Barrel

    Heavy Barrel Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    79
    Location:
    Wherever I am at the time.
    You could use a brick.Just as effective at close range.:rolleyes:
     
  11. recon7

    recon7 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3
    this looks like a job for a .22 vs .17 vs pointed stick poll

    I'm voting pointed stick.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page