1st .357 Loading... Now What?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thank you for some practical advice.

Since the loads in my manuals range from 12.7 (Hornady) to 17.0 (Lyman), you can likely see my hesitancy.

When it comes to the advice to start low and work up, start where and work up to where? If I started at 12.7 and went to 17.0, that would be a lot of loads to keep track of and without a chronograph I doubt I would see much difference unless I went from minimum to maximum in one step.

The advice to not load below 3% of max doesn't make sense since Hodgdon lists a range of 15.0 to 16.7. Max minus 3% is 16.2, well above the listed minimum. And to go extreme, 17 minus 3% is 16.49. The minimum listed load I have is 12.7!

As a new handloader, I obviously don't want to mess things up- I like all my fingers in their current arrangement. With the widely varying published information I have, not to mention all the questionable loads in the internet, it can at first seem overwhelming.

I like the advice to pick a load and learn to shoot it, rather than tune the load to the gun, especially since I am not shooting for trophies or food.

Thanks for the input. It won't be my last stupid question, I can assure you!
H110 is one of the only powders I don't do load work with. It has always given best accuracy for me at max in 357 mag. My load is 16.5.
 
I would not start under 15. I do not see much gain going above 15.5 or possibly 16. Why not try a dozen at 15, a dozen at 15.5, and a few at 16. I expect you will be happy with the 15.5. This should be good for both handgun and long gun.

For true magnum loads, 296/H110 will give you top performance and actually works pretty good. You probably are best off using it since you have it. If you end up liking it in the rifle but not in the handgun (blast will be worse with a shorter barrel), you may want to start looking for another powder sooner rather than later. Otherwise, when you are getting low on what you have, I would look at other choices for "next time". I used to use a lot of 296/H110. It is more finicky than I like and can have problems with inconsistent ignition if you do not have enough bullet pull and crimp. Lil Gun is another magnum pistol powder that gives good performance but I have avoided as it seems to come with "issues".

For the 357, there are a lot of 2400 fans out there and pretty much nobody complains about it. When I was looking for a 296/H110 alternative, I picked up 16 lbs of Shooters World Heavy Pistol (same as Lovex D-037.2 and near identical to Accurate #9) on sale at a real good price. It is just a tad faster than 2400 and 296/H110. It is a nice metering ball powder but is a whole lot less finicky than 296/H110. At max I may loose 50 to 100 fps, but I can download it a lot without worries. Although the Heavy Pistol works great, I really do not load many "full power" 357 magnums. I have bigger handguns that I tend to use if I want more than a mid range 357 load will deliver. The biggest use of my full power 357 loads is in a Henry lever gun.

For mid range loads, I use a 120 gr powder coat cast bullet and a fast burning powder loaded to about 27,000 psi (6.3 gr Promo). I load a lot of these as they make for a satisfying bang (much more than a 38) with a low cost per round and no drama.

For mild loads, I drop down to 38 pressure levels, but still use a 357 case. These are mild enough to work with tumble lube instead of PC. These get loaded in even larger quantities than the mid range stuff.
 
For 357 mag my favorite powder for 158gr XTP in a revolver is Accurate #9, I would start at 13.2gr with a standard small pistol primer, I found 13.6gr works well for a 2.75" Ruger Security Six.
 
I bought some used .357 brass from Maverick Reloading.
They were very clean so I inspected, decapped and trimmed.
Primed with CCI 550's, they are sitting, anxiously awaiting some powder.
I have a pound of H-110 and 100 Hornady 158gr XTP's. #35750, rated up to 1400 fps.

How much powder?

Should I just pick a load and call it good or load different powder weights to see what works best?

I have Hornady, Lyman, Hodgdon manuals, which vary a lot, from 13 to 17 grains.

I am not a competitive shooter. I won't hunt with these loads. I don't have a chronograph. And I know what will be the best in the 6" revolver is unlikely to be the best in the 16" rifle.

As usual, I am overthinking this, but want to see what you guys think.

Grab a copy of Hodgdon's Reloading magazine........load data for all their powders, great resource. The 2021 issue shows the Following:

158 gr Hornady XTP w/ H110 = COL: 1.58 Start charge 15.0 grains, Max charge 16.7.

If you search "Hodgdon Load Data" you'll find their load data website, punch in caliber and bullet weight.......and it'll spit out load data.

My standard .357 Magnum load is 16.7 grains of H110 under a 158gr JSP, which I run in a Coonan 1911 in .357 Magnum, a Marlin Lever Gun, and a smattering of revolvers. This load chronos at nearly 1800 fps in the lever gun, and not far from that in the Coonan. It's hefty, and you know you're shooting a .357..... For your revolver I'd guess you'll end up somewhere around 15.5 or so for a nice comfortable shooting basic .357 round.
 
Just to throw another monkey in the wrench...

Guess what showed up in the mail today?

View attachment 1008029

Time to open another can of worms...
My favorite worms for 38 special. 5gr of 231 makes a great plinking load for Steel targets.

I've tried the 125s with 296 for the 357 but it was snappy and not a lot of fun to shoot more than a cylinder full.
 
I was thinking flame cutting the top strap but wasn't sure. 110s are supposed to be real bad.
I did it to a nice model 65 S&W. Ran max loads of H110 with 125s. It was a learning experience.
Now I run 110s and 125s with something like Universal in 357 or titegroup in 38+P.
I've since gone to 180gr cast and H110. It has less blast and a smoother recoil than the old flamethrowers.
 
I did it to a nice model 65 S&W. Ran max loads of H110 with 125s. It was a learning experience.
Now I run 110s and 125s with something like Universal in 357 or titegroup in 38+P.
I've since gone to 180gr cast and H110. It has less blast and a smoother recoil than the old flamethrowers.

You want to try a real good load with those 180's? 11.5gr Alliant 2400. Shazaam!
 
You want to try a real good load with those 180's? 11.5gr Alliant 2400. Shazaam!
No one will talk me out of H110 for performance loads.
My 180's are stepping out just sh 1900 from a 20" barrel. It's accurate and kills like a much higher recoiling rifle.
The same load is accurate in my Blackhawk.
But they work spectacularly from a Henry Rifle.
Yes they do. I thought the OP was referencing revolvers also.
 
Why is that?
How will a lighter bullet hurt a revolver?
Look up flame cutting and throat erosion.
The lighter bullet uses more powder. More powder equals more flame and powder fragments ejected from the cylinder gap. This causes more damage per round fired.
Rate of fire also plays into it.
 
If you want a very mild mouse fart load, 4.8gr WST behind your 158gr LSWC. Like shoot a 22 when shot in a big heavy revolver.

12.5gr of 2400 is another good load with the 158gr pills. Does not require a mag primer and can be downloaded.

Like said you don't want to shoot 125gr or lighter using the W296/H110. Not good on the firearm.
 
I don't load for that particular bullet, but I do load a Speer bullet that is similar. CCI 550 with 14.7 grains of H-110/296 and both my 357 revolvers like it. Could go hotter if I wanted, but it shoots POA/POI.

For plinking, I am thinking you would be better served with 231, Power Pistol, Unique or another powder. I find that shooting full power magnum loads is a small part of my range time than it used to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top