Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.22 LR Options for range use

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Shuler13, Jun 27, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Shuler13

    Shuler13 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    251
    Location:
    Austin
    I'm shopping for. .22 LR revolver and could use some help. I have several other pistols but no 22s. I enjoy my S&W model 10, but as I get tired towards the end of a range trip, I'd like to finish out with 50 rounds of 22

    Features:
    Flip out cylinder
    Double Action
    At least 4 inch barrel.

    I have my eyes on a S&W 617, S&W model 17 or a Ruger SP101.

    Are there others that I should be considering for under $750? Has anyone enjoyed any of the three mentioned?

    I have posted this on another forum but hoping to get some high road feedback.
     
  2. ColtPythonElite

    ColtPythonElite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    7,925
    Colt MKIII Trooper. Full sized gun.
     
  3. General Geoff

    General Geoff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    5,072
    Location:
    Allentown, Pennsylvania
    S&W Model 63.

    63-1s.jpg


    63-2s.jpg
     
  4. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    14,613
    About a year ago I was looking for a DA .22LR revolver for use as an instructional/range gun for a friend of mine who had never fired a handgun before. I came across a LNIB S&W Model 34 with a 4" barrel and round butt grips. I added a Hogue finger grooved Monogrip in Goncalo Alves and had the perfect gun for what I was looking for.
     
  5. Shuler13

    Shuler13 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    251
    Location:
    Austin

    Very nice.
     
  6. Remllez

    Remllez Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    980
    I'd invest in a Dan Wesson .22, full size goodness with the ability to change barrel lengths in under 10 minutes. If you're lucky you might find a kit complete with 2 maybe 3 barrels for $750.00 or so.

    Although the Smith models you mention are good guns as well. I've no experience with the Ruger SP model you mention but they should fit your requirements quite well. Buying a .22 for a little more trigger time is a wise decision and it may help your center fire shooting as a bonus.
     
  7. skoro

    skoro Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,058
    Location:
    Texas
    I have a 4" Model 17 from 1987. In addition, I have a 4" Model 18 from 1958. Functionally, they're almost identical, only a slight difference in sights. Love both guns. They're a joy to shoot.
     
  8. TonyT

    TonyT Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,353
    Location:
    Michigan
    Purchase a 4 inch S&W 617 and don't look back. I have almost 15,000 rpouinds through mine. A real fun gun to shoot.
     
  9. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,312
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    If you run across a used one, I can highly recommend it. No longer in production....Rossi 511 Sportsman.

    Of the 3, I'd get the Ruger. I'm a Ruger fanboy, though. A good used M17 would be SWEET, but I might not be able to afford such down here with what old Smiths tend to go for. They're sweet shooters, though.

    t9tg0l.jpg
     
  10. CajunBass

    CajunBass Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    5,689
    Location:
    North Chesterfield, Virginia
    Look hard and find a Smith & Wesson 22 Combat Masterpiece/Model 18.

    This one is from 1953, and wears the post war matte finish. Later ones show the more expected Smith & Wesson bright blue.

    071211141434.gif

    Probably set you back less than a new 617. I paid less than $500.00 for this one about a year ago.
     
  11. birdshooter

    birdshooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    131
    I too paid $500 for this Model 18 a year and a half ago. I put the Ahrend's grips on it. I love it! I would really love a 10 shot 617 someday.

    b8132843.jpg
     
  12. BYJO4

    BYJO4 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,776
    The S&W model 17 and 617 have always had an excellent reputation. The action and accuracy out of the box is as good as it gets without custom work. For many years I had the blued 17s but now have the 617 in 4" and 6". They also maintain their value very well.

    4Inch.jpg

    6Inch.jpg
     
  13. Shuler13

    Shuler13 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    251
    Location:
    Austin
    Thanks for the replies. I'm putting off the .22 for a while. Got a great deal on a Spartan III on gunbroker so my firearm fund has diminished once again. Funny how that happens.

    Before I emptied my wallet, I had settled on the 617 like many have suggested, but it still felt too heavy in my hand for end of the range trip fun. The only older models I could find were all on gubroker and I have a hard time committing to a used 22 without seeing it in person first. I found one Rossi, but felt it was overpriced.

    Perhaps this will become my excuse to go to every gunshow around.

    Thanks for the responses.
     
  14. General Geoff

    General Geoff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    5,072
    Location:
    Allentown, Pennsylvania
    The 63 is a J-frame and thus will be lighter than the 617. Just something to think about.
     
  15. Shuler13

    Shuler13 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    251
    Location:
    Austin
    Yeah. Handled a 63. Didn't feel right.
     
  16. Stainz

    Stainz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,117
    Location:
    Pinson, AL
    The OEM grips on my two recent 63s and older 651 weren't to my liking, so I tried the S&W Accessories $43 '60 Pro' grips. Great improvement. Here are the 3" & 5" 63s sporting those grips - and my 4" 617 sporting cocobolo Ahrends retro target grips:

    IMG_4604.jpg

    Without a doubt, the new 4" 617 was my best purchase for a range .22. It was first, too - and left me with a deep regret; "Why did I wait so long??". Yes, it was expensive - as much or more than a K-frame .38 of the time - at least as difficult to make, so the price then was fair. I had just turned sixty - and had owned everything from .32-.454 in a revolver. The .22 revolver added the 'frugal & fun' factors. Two years later, my new 3" 63 would cost me more! Night and day difference - the 4" 617 is a dedicated range gun - the 3" 63 is a great plinker/toter. The 3" 63 has stolen the show since it arrived here - it is that much fun. The '60 Pro' grips really helped. The 5" 63 is an anomaly - I bought it from a friend's estate. The trigger of a J-frame will never be as good as that of a K-frame, and the 5" 63, despite spring changes, proves that. Oddly, the stock 3" 63 had a lighter DA pull (I use DA ~80% of the time.). The longer sight radius does help it's accuracy a tad over the 3". It is my least favorite rimfire revolver, however - but it has a home.

    Stainz
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page