Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

223 vs 22-250 Efficiency

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by bluetopper, May 9, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bluetopper

    bluetopper Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,219
    Location:
    Northeast TX
    The 22-250 gets roughly 11% more velocity using the same 55gr bullet and in doing so, consumes about 45% more powder to achieve it over the 223 cartridge. Is it worth it? To some yes, to others, not so much.
     
  2. mljdeckard

    mljdeckard Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,665
    Location:
    In a part of Utah that resembles Tattooine.
    To me, it's a question of whether you prefer a bolt rifle or an AR. If you're using a bolt rifle for varminting, use the 22-250.
     
  3. cfullgraf

    cfullgraf Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2010
    Messages:
    6,922
    Location:
    East TN
    Depends on the range.

    22-250 will reach out and touch something a bit farther than the 223 Remington.
     
  4. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    9,886
    Not to me, and it is a lot more complex too. Most 22-250 barrels are slow twisted to shoot lighter bullets. The 223's faster twist allows much heavier bullets. In reality the 22-250 usually shoots flatter with lighter bullets, up to a point. The 223 is really designed to perform better at true long range with heavier bullets

    To me the 223 is more versatile. At reasonable ranges I can compensate for the difference in bullet drop. Plus I have the option of heavier bullets which opens up a lot more possibilities.
     
  5. Peter M. Eick

    Peter M. Eick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,035
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ok, a 22 Hornet gets 500 fps less velocity (45 grn bullet, speer 14 data) for half the powder. So it is 17% less efficient for half the investment of powder.

    Is it worth it? To some yes, to others not so much.

    Lets go one step finer.

    A 22 LR (if you can find a round) uses a tenth the powder of a 223 and puts out the same 40 grn bullet at half the velocity.

    Is it worth it? To some yes, to others not so much.


    To me, the 22/250 is a neat compromise for folks like me that could not find a 220Swift when I sold off my last one. Remember you can always download from 22/250 velocities to 223 velocities or even 22LR velocities if you are careful and creative. You can't take a 223 up to the 22/250 velocities easily and safely.

    This is why I don't own a 223 anymore and do own a 22/250.
     
  6. joed

    joed Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,131
    Location:
    Ohio
    Depends on your use. I'm a varminter and enjoy that type of hunting. The velocity of the 22-250 really kills groundhogs. I would never use a 223 with a heavy bullet because of the risk of ricochet.
     
  7. witchhunter

    witchhunter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,821
    Location:
    Lassen County, California
    Depends on your use. This is like a .308 vs. .30/06 thread. They both have pros and cons.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page