Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

243--600 yrd gun?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by RevolverMan567, Mar 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RevolverMan567

    RevolverMan567 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    312
    Location:
    outside obamaland
    I am thinking about picking up a remmy 700 VLS in 243. I plan on transplanting the action and barrel into a HS precision or McMillan with a full length bedding block and throwing in a 40-X trigger.

    The twist rate is 1-9 1/8th so i should be ok with 100-maybe 105 grainers for pretty informal practice, but will it be a suitable platform for shootin out to 600 yards, I know i will need to practice because my average "long range shooting" tops out at 300. but i have th room and wonder if this will be a good one. Obviously dosent have to be a 1 MOA gun but hitting a b52 man size sillhoute at 600 would be freakin sweet:D

    I'm no sniper and dont presume to be but i do consider myself of above average in shooting simply because i get to practice out to 300 on the regular. i love the .243 round and consider it underrated, i dont need an uber magnum for 600. guess im just looking for moral support on my next several hundred hard earned dollars being sunk into steel and fiberglass;)

    already have an xr100 in 223 but looking for some more punch at that range just for the fun of it
     
  2. Bearhands

    Bearhands Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2007
    Messages:
    507
    Location:
    PA
    My guess would be: "It can be done" if a field mouse doesn't pass wind near it after about 300 yards. The 100 gr 243 bullet is not a "force" @ that kind of range.
    A 22lr can go a mile, but who know's where........
     
  3. Auburn1992

    Auburn1992 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,015
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Well I would think a .243 could do it if something like a .223 or 22-250 could right?
     
  4. taliv

    taliv Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    22,098
    in case you don't know, hitting a b52 target at 600 yrds with an AR in 223 is pretty dang easy.

    i'm not trying to talk you out of a bolt gun, but were it me, i'd rather have 3000 rnds of ammo and a whole summer of shootin
     
  5. browningguy

    browningguy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    4,572
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Actually, as one who shoots a .243 Savage 12 FV, they make a very fine gun out to 1000 yards. And if only shooting to 600 the 80-95 gr. Sierra and Berger bullets will do very well. If you can load them out to the lands and still fit your magazine the Berger 105 VLD is an excellent bullet, but I find in my gun I have to single load them. There is also a 107 SMK but I have not tried them yet. I shoot the 70 gr. SMK for everything from 100-300 yards and it stays 1/2 MOA, and the 95 gr. for out to 600 which is the longest my regular range has.

    Here's the Sierra info on the 95 gr. SMK:
    Bullet Name Diameter inches Weight grains Sectional Density Ballistic Coefficients
    .243 dia. (6mm) 95 gr. HPBT MatchKing .243 95
    SD .230
    BC .480 @ 2750 fps and above
    .450 between 1700 and 2750 fps
    .400 @ 1700 fps and below
    Thats in the range of the 175 SMK in .308. And the 107 goes over .522 BC, which beats the 175 SMK in a .308 by a reasonable margin.

    In short, all the guys winning long range, out to 1000 yards, (David Tubbs et al) are NOT shooting anything but 6's or 6.5's. The high BC bullets buck the wind better, have less drop, and much less recoil than shooting the 175's and up in the .308. And they make a fine coyote gun out to any reasonable range also.
     
  6. W.E.G.

    W.E.G. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    7,392
    Location:
    all over Virginia
    The .243 has the potential to be very accurate at great distance.

    However, the .243 can burn a lot of powder in that skinny pipe. Expect faster bore erosion than larger calibers.

    Very good article on this issue at http://www.snipersparadise.com/tsmag/june2001.htm
     
  7. skinewmexico

    skinewmexico Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,621
    Location:
    West Texas
  8. ShunZu

    ShunZu member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Messages:
    568
    Location:
    Near St. Louis, MO
    I've killed coyotes, sitting still not running, mind you, at over 600 (measured with a Leica laser rangefinder) with my MK II VT Ruger. The rifle's preferred load is 42.50 grains of IMR4350 behind a 107 grain Sierra Matchking BTHP. It shoots MOA at 200 yds. That's only 1 rifle, and I've had it for many years and tweaked its loads -- but certainly the .243 within reason (no sidewinds over 15mph, please) at 600 yds.
     
  9. slylikea_fox

    slylikea_fox Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    38
    Location:
    Winchester, VA
    I just recently picked up a .243 varmint sps and put it in a hs stock, it's proably a good bit cheaper then the vls. I haven't really shot it though so I can't give you my impression yet.
     
  10. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,393
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    I just recently realized this myself...and I been shooting long range for 25 years...the 243 is better than the 308...that rate of twist should be OK for the heavies.
     
  11. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    Oh yeah, you will be fine. It should be able to take 105 or even 110's.
     
  12. ocabj

    ocabj Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,383
    Location:
    Riverside, CA
    Anyone who says .243 won't work for mid to long range isn't familiar with 6mm.

    The 6mm bullets on the market are ballistically some of the best bullets out there.

    Throat erosion rate aside, the .243 is a fine cartridge for precision shooting.

    Someone stated before that the 1:9 twist is suspect. I agree if you plan on shooting 105s and up. Most of the manufacturers are recommending a 1:8.
     
  13. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,393
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    Thats true....100 grains is about the limit of a 1 in 9 for a 6mm...i spoke before I thought about in my first post.

    The 6mm are second only to the 6.5 mm rounds in downrange performance...and again...I been doing this stuff for a while and I just recently admitted this to myself...that the 243 is superior to the 308...even at 1000 yards. (with bullets 100 grains and heavier)
     
  14. RevolverMan567

    RevolverMan567 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    312
    Location:
    outside obamaland
    thanks

    this is the kind of info i was expecting but wanted to make sure, i had thought about the SPS varmint in 243 but i love the satin blue and jewelled bolt on a dedicated target gun. just asthetics but i like it.
     
  15. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    22,321
    A shooter here is using a Savage .243 for mid- and long range shooting. Doing quite well, too, with 105 and 107 grain bullets.
    You will just have to shoot the gun to see how long and heavy a bullet your barrel will handle.

    As somebody said, there is nothing wrong with a .223 at midrange.
     
  16. skinewmexico

    skinewmexico Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,621
    Location:
    West Texas
    I've been seriously considereing re-barreling one of my Savages to 243, and shooting 115g DTACs in it.
     
  17. T.R.

    T.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,560
    Location:
    Manatee County, Florida
    I'm a huge fan of .243 for hunting mulies and 'lopes in open country. But Dakota winds are often a serious handicap for accurate shooting.

    A 600 yard shot during gusting winds will be an exersize in frustration.

    TR
     
  18. skinewmexico

    skinewmexico Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,621
    Location:
    West Texas
    With any cartridge.
     
  19. Seafarer12

    Seafarer12 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    1,028
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I like 6mm's for long range shooting I would rather have a 6mm BR but a 243 would get the job done just not as tight a groups. I would rather have a 1-8 twist for hevies but but a 1-9 will work pretty well. You will just have to expariment and see what your gun likes. If you don't reload you will have to take it up to get the most out of your rifle.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page