Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

3 position decocker/safeties not as cool as I thought?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Scott_S84, Sep 6, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Scott_S84

    Scott_S84 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1
    So I was talking to some fellow shooters at the range today and mentioned my Browning Pro -9 and how great its 3 position decocker/safety was. When I first discovered that feature I thought wow why don't more gun makers design it into their guns. It seems however that I'm alone in thinking that it is a highly desireable feature. I sought out and paid an extra 40$ for the gun over its FN brother because of it. I intitially bought it to familiarize myself with SA/DA guns and to try to master the DA/SA transition but it was nice knowing I could carry it cocked and locked if my usual carry guns(S&W M&P's) failed somehow. The decocker made that sort of practice very easy and it was an excellent way to familiarize my mother with Semi-autos. So does anyone else like these kind of safeties? The only other guns that have them that I'm aware of are the Taurus PT-92/99 and the HK Mk.23. Granted I am trying to sell it as I've got plenty of pistols and have been bitten by the AR bug and those things are damned expensive but I'd like to know other forum goers thoughts.
     
  2. Treo

    Treo member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,110
    Location:
    Co. Springs
    I like the idea but I hate the gun (Taurus) it's on
     
  3. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    The idea is good on paper, I guess, but select a gun based on your needs, not on what other people think is "cool." Also, this type of safety gives you a number of choices of carry modes (hammer down for DA first shot/safety off, hammer down/safety on, cocked and locked), but IMO you should experiment, select the mode you're most comfortable with and stick with it to avoid confusion under stress.
     
  4. Jason_G

    Jason_G Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,874
    Location:
    Louisiana
    The H&K USP and the HK45 can be had like that. "Variant 1" is what it's called on those two models. I have a USP like that, and I think it's the best of both worlds. I like it.

    Jason
     
  5. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,748
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    I think its a great idea that makes it easy to demonstrate the superiority of cocked and locked over DA/SA operation.

    The feature I really wish more gun makers would pick up is allowing the slide to be racked for loading and unloading with the safety on -- the one thing Tanfoglio improved from the CZ75 when they made the EAA Witness guns.

    --wally.
     
  6. skinewmexico

    skinewmexico Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,621
    Location:
    West Texas
    I don't like any pistols with manual safeties. Technology has moved on.
     
  7. basicblur

    basicblur Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,650
    Location:
    VA
    You're not, but if you find yourself turning into a pragmatist, be prepared for the ridicule you'll find hurled your way! :what:

    As another poster, I also have an HK USPC in Variant 1. 'Bout the safest way for a civilian to carry IMO-multiple options, and if you don't want the safety on, you don't have to use it.
    BTW...to me HK and 1911s have the best safeties I've seen so far. The lever is big enough, solid enough, & works in the "correct" direction-unlike my S&W 4013TSW, which requires a "thumbs up" to knock the safety off. :banghead:
     
  8. loop

    loop Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,025
    Location:
    NW Arizona
    +1 Wally.

    Best feature I've seen yet on a self-stuffer.

    Don't need a decocker because I'll carry cocked and locked or hammer down on an empty chamber. I hate DA first and SA second. Makes me neurotic on the firing line.

    Last thing I want in my life is a schizophrenic pistol.
     
  9. krs

    krs Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,588
    Location:
    Tall Trees
    That feature is the reason that my old Smith & Wesson 469 is still with me. It's got a long heavy double action pull for first round OR if I decock on a loaded chamber with the safety left off it holds the hammer back far enough to use my thumb to bring it to full cock if time allows. The single action pull is light and crisp.

    VERY ugly gun, but I still go to it when I walk around here, and it's fairly small for 12+1 capacity.
     
  10. Siderite

    Siderite Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    175
    Location:
    Indiana
    Scott_S84, welcome to THR! (though it looks like you've been lurking for a while, that's fine too - I started the same way).

    At first, I also liked the idea, having seen it on the Taurus PT92. However, I found that un-safing quickly (as if under stress), I might end up holding the decocker down, and end up pulling the trigger with no result. That ruled the Taurus out for a serious gun. I don't know if the Browning suffers from that problem, but I'd recommend checking if there's a chance you may carry it.
     
  11. HB

    HB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,459
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    I guess you also like heavy triggers and grip safeties? or revolvers, on which I agree

    HB
     
  12. basicblur

    basicblur Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,650
    Location:
    VA
    That may be, but unfortunately, humans have not.
     
  13. BHPshooter

    BHPshooter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,451
    Location:
    Utah
    Initially, that was the one thing that kinda bothered me about the FNP series, as opposed to the Browning Pro-series. I liked that the Browning had the 3-position safety. Many options, which I would think would appeal to the widest audience.

    I believe Browning Dropped the Pro-series, which kind of sucks.

    However, now FN has SAO FNPs, which I like even better. That's just my opinion -- and it surely won't appeal to nearly as many consumers -- but it's my personal slice of pie.

    Wes
     
  14. DWARREN123

    DWARREN123 Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,749
    Location:
    Between TN & KY
    I like the minimum amount of controls on my pistols, less to do or mess up.
     
  15. M&PVolk

    M&PVolk Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Messages:
    522
    I really like a 3 position safety. I will never understand why some people don't like options.

    I think decocked with safety off is the safest way to carry. You get a genuine revolver type feel on that first pull that makes accidental discharge under stress much less likely, and you get precision follow up shots once you return to SA.

    Cocked and locked is great if you don't miss the safety under stress. Botch that, and you may have a very expensive club in your hands.

    I carry a DA only M&P .40, as it fits me like a glove, but I would love a triple action safety. I believe point and shoot is the best way to handle defense, but a long first pull helps prevent accidents under duress.
     
  16. Tribal

    Tribal Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    Virginia 757
    I actually really like the three-position switch on my USPc. Decocked-and-locked works well for me and makes me a little more comfortable than single-action 1911s and BHPs.

    I have to say that I never understood this argument. Wouldn't you just flick your thumb again if you missed it the first time?
     
  17. Trebor

    Trebor Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,817
    The problem with a three position safety that goes from "Safe" to "Fire" to "Decock" is that under stress you can thumb the safety down from "Safe" to "Fire" and accidentilly go all the way to "Decock."

    I believe John Farnam reported this happening to some of his students in training classes.

    Granted, the gun will still fire if you accidentilly decocked it, but now you've lost that SA trigger pull.

    It's up to you to determine how much of a drawback this is to you, but you asked about possible downsides, and that is a very real downside.

    Personally, I want either a simple decocker or a safety that goes down for "Fire." No slide mounted safeties that go up for "Fire" and no triple position safety/decockers. If I want a gun with a safety, I'll buy one, and if I want a gun with a decocker, I'll buy one of those.
     
  18. Disaster

    Disaster Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    402
    I read about the argument of accidently decocking but I can't see it being a real problem for anyone who spends the proper amount of time becoming familiar with their sidearm.

    On the USP, you really have to go wayyyyy past safety off to decock. If you were so hyped up, you did that, I'm sure you'd have plenty of hype to squeeze through a DA pull.
     
  19. Mad Magyar

    Mad Magyar Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,967
    Location:
    Arizona
    Well, that eliminates my PPK.....I find it interesting that in some of the posts above some all of sudden see that flicking safety under stress can be problematic.
    These comments were conspicuously absent when discussing "cocked-n-locked" threads vs racking a slide.....:rolleyes:
     
  20. M&PVolk

    M&PVolk Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Messages:
    522
    It's not that hitting the safety is difficult, but assuming a worst case scenario when you have someone on top of you or someone who has delivered a blow already, it might be surprisingly difficult to hit that safety. That's why I like the decocker...carry decocked with safety off. Long first pull, nothing to try and switch off.
     
  21. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,748
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    If you can get the gun out of its holster, you can get the safety off as it clears leather. I wipe off the safety as I draw even if the gun doesn't have a safety.

    Other than range toys, I won't buy a gun with a safety that rotates the wrong way!

    --wally.
     
  22. Jason_G

    Jason_G Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,874
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Familiarization. It's pretty hard to accidentally decock a USP going from safe to fire. You have to go way down with it, and pass up a stiff and easily felt and heard "click."

    Jason
     
  23. NG VI

    NG VI Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,884
    Location:
    Maine
    I find the same thing, the USP decocker is a very conscious device, it does not just smoothly slide through fire into decock.
     
  24. sqlbullet

    sqlbullet Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    445
    I had a Taurus in 40S&W with this feature almost 15 years ago. Normally being a cocked and locked guy, I too expected a best of all worlds flexibility.

    I had the exact issue expressed by a couple of others. In rapid draw drills with a range buddy timing me, I would sweep the safety too far about 30% of the time. This left me with a DA pull.

    I have no experience with this concept executed in any other handgun. The HK or Browning may not give me the same problem. I do like the concept.
     
  25. Snipe315

    Snipe315 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    43
    Location:
    California
    Well my favorite pistol right now is my USPf 45.

    The only thing I don't love about it is that I OFTEN will accidentally decock the pistol when trying to just take it off safe.

    :banghead:

    I can see where it would be very hard NOT to do this under stress. I've thought about changing it to Variant 9 which doesn't have a decocker for this single reason.

    Of course, my USP is over a decade old and has tens of thousands of round thru it so that might be why it is so well worn in.

    :rolleyes:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page