Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.300 win mag or .308

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by GarandOwner, Aug 15, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. GarandOwner

    GarandOwner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    537
    Location:
    Florida
    I am thinking of getting a new Remington 700P for range work at 300+ yards.
    My question is: Does one round have a greater benifit as far as accuracy
    goes for target shooting? or is it more of a "personal preference" What are the pros and cons of each.
     
  2. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    .300 Win Mag velocities are higher and match bullets are heavier. Probably an advantage in high wind. Hits harder, but paper isn't elk. Shoots a bit flatter, but you'll have to know your bullet drop either way, at 300+ yards.

    .308 is cheaper, lower recoil, and (probably) doesn't burn up the barrel as fast. Short action may be stiffer, but not a really big deal. Gun is lighter, but you're not looking for a still-hunting rifle anyway.

    I'd get the .308 unless I had a very good reason to get the .300 WM.
     
  3. Scorpiusdeus

    Scorpiusdeus member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    740
    Location:
    Ventura County, California
    At that distance for your purposes I don't think one has an advantage over another.

    .308 is cheaper or so it would appear to me and more readily available.
     
  4. moojpg2

    moojpg2 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    189
    Location:
    Western Massachusetts
    .300 all the way

    i personally would go for the .300, but that's what I shoot so i'm a little biased. when u really start reaching out beyond 300yds, it starts to have an advantage, especially out near the 1000yd mark. yea, the 308 is a great round, I have a friend who swears by his Remington LTR in .308 (which is a real great gun, absolute tack driver, and I would swear by it too, but not for competition out to 1000yds), but he is wanting a .300 for his next rifle.it's just a more capable round, and it has the same accuracy potential as the .308. Hand loading is a must though because otherwise it does cost a fortune to shoot a lot.

    not to mention it's a lot of fun sitting at the range shooting the .300, when your target is at 600yds, and you squeeze the first one off and there's someone at the bench next to you shooting a .223 at 100 yds, it's really funny to see the " oh ****,*** was that" look on there face.
     
  5. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    That's a whole different world out there. 300+ is different from 1000. Depends on what he meant by "+", I guess. :)

    If you like that, try a big-bore flintlock.
     
  6. Outlaws

    Outlaws Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,481
    Location:
    Valley of the Sun
    Go with the 308 for the exact reasons as stated above.
     
  7. bkjeffrey

    bkjeffrey Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2007
    Messages:
    753
    Location:
    Southern states
    Get one of each:D
     
  8. Legionnaire

    Legionnaire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,072
    Location:
    Texas
    My opinion: .308 to 850 yards, maybe 900 with 175gr match ammo. If you plan to regularly shoot 800+, go with the .300.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page