Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.308 Mini-14

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by natedog, Nov 13, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. natedog

    natedog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,634
    Location:
    Bakersfield, California
  2. son of a gun

    son of a gun member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    366
    Location:
    ClearWater Florida USA
  3. Andrew Wyatt

    Andrew Wyatt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,468
    Location:
    Bakersfield, California
    it has yet to be proven that there was anything wrong with that particular m-1a besides a bent oprod.
     
  4. Telperion

    Telperion Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Oregon
    Ugh, look at those cheap-o sights.
     
  5. foghornl

    foghornl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    7,403
    Hmmm a Mini-08 (.308) & a Mini-43 (.243). I would take one of each.
     
  6. Joe Demko

    Joe Demko Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,523
    Location:
    Just two minutes from sanity.
    It would have to have been a better performer than either the Mini-14 or the Ranch Rifle I owned were before I paid anything for one.
     
  7. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,575
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    To me, .243 makes more sense than .308 in the mini action; if you are stepping all the way up to .308, it would seem to be easier to start from scratch.

    Duncan Long says in his book on the mini-14 that the XGI was cancelled because Ruger wasn't satisfied with the accuracy.
     
  8. SodaPop

    SodaPop member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,430
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I'd rather have an M1A in .223.
     
  9. JohnMc

    JohnMc Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    365
    Location:
    North Carolina
    The mini 14 was based on the M14, with corners cut to save production costs, aside from simply scaling down. That's why it's less accurate than the M1A. I'd just rebarrel an M1A to go for a .243. It'd be way more accurate.

    JohnMc
     
  10. Andrew Wyatt

    Andrew Wyatt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,468
    Location:
    Bakersfield, California
    I'd like to see a mini with a the gas block replaced with an assembly that attaches directly to the barrel, like the m-14, and with m-14 type sights.

    if it were chambered in 6.5mm PPC or something, that'd just be gravy.
     
  11. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,682
    What I learned at Ruger Armourer School...

    20 were made and distributed. One factory employee told me he saw a sample at a gun show but passed it up thinking he'll buy a new one and not one of those "test" models the factory sent out to the writers. He kicked himself in the his *** afterwards.

    The XGI had problems with throwing the 5th bullet and that upset ole Bill. Ruger engineers resolved it by making a heavy op-rod that added to the weight. Ole Bill wasn't enthralled with it. Finally, when it came time to gear up, Ole Bill looked at it and was told it would cost $1 million to gear up. He said he could make more by sticking with the Mini-14 and the XGI was shelved.

    BTW, I saw the wax casting for the receiver. It was HUGE and struck me as being 10" long. OHMIGOD, a club!
     
  12. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,575
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    And much bigger and heavier. I was thinking the .243 would work in something of the mini's size and weight, whereas the .308 would not.
     
  13. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    nate, Bill Ruger made the decision to cancel the XG1 before you were born, c. 1986.
     
  14. JohnMc

    JohnMc Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    365
    Location:
    North Carolina
    BenEzra
    True enough. What's an AR-10 (in .243) weigh? That'd be pretty nice.

    If I was into wildcats, necking a 7.62x39 mm down to .243 would also be a very nice Mini caliber. Hmmm, the 6x39 JMc? :)

    JohnMc
     
  15. JohnMc

    JohnMc Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    365
    Location:
    North Carolina
    It's been done:

    http://www.reloadbench.com/cartridges/6ppc.html

    Accuracy Rifle systems will rebarrel a Mini-30 to these calibers (* = wildcat)
    22 PPC *
    6mm PPC
    7.62x39 SAAMI
    .308 x 39mm *
    7.62x39 Ackley Improved *
    .308x39mm Ackley Improved *
    35x39mm *
    25x39mm ARS boomer *
    http://www.homestead.com/accuracyriflesystems3/index.html

    They do Mini14's as well.

    JohnMc
     
  16. mete

    mete Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    3,579
    Location:
    NY
    That whole incident left many people angered at Ruger because there were ads for the gun in the magazines yet the gun was never produced. This advertising first making later of course is a practice of more than one company and it stinks.
     
  17. TODD3465

    TODD3465 Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2003
    Messages:
    323
    Yeah BACK THEN I wanted one BAD! But now I got a M-1-A National Match so who cares.:neener:
     
  18. Houndawg

    Houndawg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    288
    Location:
    Illinois
    Doesn't or didn't Ruger make a Mini-30?
     
  19. natedog

    natedog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,634
    Location:
    Bakersfield, California
    Yep, it's in 7.62x39mm. Takes a proprierty magazine.
    A flaw in the Mini series is that they have different magazines than the AR and AK series (and price). I'm fine with their accuracy, but it does not justify a NIB price of $500. If they could sell the Mini for -$400, and the 30 took AK mags and the 14 took AR mags, I think they would sell much better.
     
  20. Dr.Rob

    Dr.Rob Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    14,651
    Location:
    Centennial, CO
    I was one of those people that wanted an XG-1.

    Still think it was a good idea, a great "militia" rifle, and a decent hunter.

    Hate those peep sights though.
     
  21. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,575
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    I've always wondered why someone doesn't offer an aftermarket mag well piece (if you have a mini, you know what I'm talking about) and magazine catch for the mini-30 that would allow the use of AK magazines.
     
  22. clint1911a1

    clint1911a1 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003
    Messages:
    69
    Location:
    Kentucky
    A .308 Mini-14? Wouldn't that just be an M-14? :rolleyes:
     
  23. Publicola

    Publicola Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    226
    Location:
    Colorado
    From what I recall some company down in Florida a few years back was making Mini-14's in .308. It involved rewelding the receiver & adding metal, but they were doing it. No ideas about quality, accuracy or safety though.

    The .308 Winchester & the .243 Winchester require an action that's the same length. After all, the .243 Winchester is just the .308 Winchester cases necked down to .243. The .243 Winchester has a max COL of 2.650".
    The .308 Winchester has a max COL of 2.750". That .10" difference isn't enough to let you use a different sized action. So a Mini-14 sized action wouldn't work with a .243 Winchester.

    But I agree that Ruger should have came out with a gas operated semi in those calibers. Hell, if he had came out with a mag fed '06 based on the Mini design he'd have probably sold more of them than the Mini-14's in a given year (as long as they were priced about the same).

    But if anyone wants something close to a Mini in .308 Winchester or .243 Winchester, rebarreling a Garand or M1A is feasible. & if ya want to trim weight & length then getting a "Tanker" conversion done to your Garand or a "Bush" conversion done to your M1A. Both will leave you with around an 18" barrel & a little less weight than a standard Garand or M1A.
     
  24. Sunray

    Sunray Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,795
    Location:
    London, Ont.
    "...many people angered at Ruger because there were ads for the gun in the magazines yet the gun was never produced..." Yep. Ruger and most other firearm companies are forever announcing stuff they don't have in production. The .243 WSSM comes to mind. Among others. Announced in what, January '03? Supposedly for release last Julyish. Anyone seen any?
    Up here, one of the small sporting goods chains had the XGI in their catalogue for 2 years after Ruger announced the cancellation. Had a MSRP too.
    "...a "Tanker" conversion..." These are notorious for not working. Waste of money for yet another marketing concept. The M1A was chambered in .243 and .358 Win way back when. Don't think it is anymore though. Custom barrel required now. Knew a guy had a Super Match in .243. Walked into a Montreal gun show with it slung over his shoulder and was mobbed by eager buyers. Apparently M1A's were few and far between down there.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page