Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.308 or 7mm-08

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by crowsnest2002, Dec 20, 2006.

?

.308 or 7mm-08

  1. .308

    62 vote(s)
    58.5%
  2. 7mm-08

    44 vote(s)
    41.5%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. crowsnest2002

    crowsnest2002 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    110
    Location:
    PA
    Which would you choose for a moderate range rifle on varmints up to whitetail deer. Probably range would be 300yrds max. Also reloading can be an option.
     
  2. K.L.O.sako

    K.L.O.sako Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    191
    Location:
    Ash.KY.
    i know the 308. right ammo and right gun, you'll hit pop cans at 300yds however i don't know the 7mm-08 cant say for sure. 308 ammo is cheap too.
     
  3. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,450
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    The 7mm08 and 308 are both fine chamberings for whitetail deer and both will dispatch songdogs with authority, but both are a bit of overkill but usable for smaller varmints... The 308 probably gives you a little more SPLAT factor for hogs and such, but the differences will be largely unnoticed under most conditions. In turn, the 7mm08 has (on average) a wee bit less drop at 300 yards than the 308 due to its slightly more aerodynamic bullets. The difference is probably no greater than an inch or so at 300 yards, with a widening gap as the distance increases. I call that all a wash for your stated purposes.

    In the end, I'd make the decision based not upon technical differences, because inside of 300 yards and on thin-skinned medium game - you'll not see much performance delta between the two. I think that ammo availability is a far more important factor, and in that regard the 308 wins.

    I'd choose 308.
     
  4. Shawnee

    Shawnee member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    3,306
    Location:
    Along "That Dark and Bloody River"
    7mm - O8

    :D
     
  5. gunny1022

    gunny1022 member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2006
    Messages:
    70
    Made the decision to shoot the 7mm-08 in NRA Metallic Silhouette because of the superior ballistic coefficient. Bullet drops less at 500 meters where wind speed is a big factor. Less recoil and after match shoot pop cans at 500 meters!
     
  6. Hutch

    Hutch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,675
    Location:
    Opelika, AL
    Pay no attention to Shawnee.:neener:

    .308 for many reasons. For silhouette, Gunny may have a point about the 7, but for many, many reasons, the .308 is a better choice.

    More readily available factory ammo.
    Milsurp, while getting harder to find, is available for plinking.
    If you reload, then:
    Brass is commonly available
    Many, many more bullets to choose from in 30 cal.
     
  7. Essex County

    Essex County Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    Messages:
    1,247
    Got a bunch of experience with both. Both are great and each is a handloader's dream. I currently use a 7-08 A Bolt more often than not. Good bullet selection in both. Either way you don't have a problem..Essex
     
  8. Powder_Burn

    Powder_Burn Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    93
    I would choose .308 only because there is a wider variety of factory ammo available. Other than that, peformance is very close between .308 and 7mm-08.

    However, for a varmint and deer combo rifile, I would probably go with something in the 6mm/.243 cartidge family over the above anyway.
     
  9. ~z

    ~z Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2005
    Messages:
    813
    Location:
    High plains of Texas
    Pound for pound the 7mm bullet will provide a higher BC if that influences your decision at all. If you reload, all that plentiful .308 brass folks are talking about becomes 7-08 brass pretty easily. I shoot and load for both but usually grab the 7-08 on my way out the door for deer/hogs inside 300 yds. If you do not reload, you will find more choices in off the shelf ammo for the .308 though.
    ~z
     
  10. Lambo119

    Lambo119 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    147
    Location:
    Midwest
    .308 only because of cheap surplus ammo and more selection in factory loads. But the 7mm is a fine choice as well just more costly to shoot.
     
  11. WYO

    WYO Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    777
    For those purposes, unless you're talking about super small critters like prairie dogs, I'd standardize on a 120 grain bullet in 7mm-08.
     
  12. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    The 7mm-08 is probably the better round.

    If you don't mind loading it yourself, it's the better choice.

    If you have to rely on factory ammo, though, .308 will be a lot cheaper and easier to deal with.
     
  13. rockstar.esq

    rockstar.esq Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,475
    First off the 7mm is Metric :neener:

    Second, the academic differences that may favor the 7mm are following the same school of thought that brought us such meaningless additions as the .204 Ruger, and the Super short magnum line. A few hundred fps (if that) and a couple of inches difference at most reasonable ranges equates to just another marginally accepted wildcat that accordingly gets a maximum of two loadings per manufacturer. Personally I'd rather not have some PITA caliber that I can't easily find ammo for. If I were to buy a 7mm it'd be a Remington Mag, not a metric tag a long of the greatest 30 caliber cartridge extant!
     
  14. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    That's sort of funny, if you're dissing WSM's.

    Don't get me wrong, I don't own or plan to own any WSM rifles, and I have nothing against the .308.

    But the .308 is nothing but the civilian name for a government project to stuff the .30-06 into a shorter case. For hunting use, it's inferior to the longer but otherwise identical .30-06 by every measure (couple hundred FPS, range of bullet weights) except for the fact that it does indeed fit into a shorter case and hence a compact rifle if that's what you want.

    The .308 is the original project that had the same objectives as the WSM's, and it surely inspired the WSM's, since, in principle, it's the same thing: a short-action version of a proven high-power hunting round.

    Furthermore, a couple of inches doesn't matter on deer, but it does on smaller game and varmints.
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2006
  15. ~z

    ~z Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2005
    Messages:
    813
    Location:
    High plains of Texas
    would it be better if we call it a .284"?
    ~z
     
  16. dakotasin

    dakotasin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,777
    Location:
    Transient
    7-08 is the most useful hunting cartridge there is. i have 308's, and i have 7-08's, and while i am in love w/ my 308's, i gotta admit the 7-08 is the superior cartridge. everything from superior trajectory to lighter recoil favors the 7-08. and all that great 308 brass? yep, run it thru your 7-08 sizer die, and you now have great 7-08 brass.
     
  17. Pumpkinheaver

    Pumpkinheaver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,255
    Location:
    missouri
    You can't go wrong with either cartridge.
     
  18. wanderinwalker

    wanderinwalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    1,964
    Location:
    SW NH
    I say flip a coin. Either one will do the job.

    After debating the same question recently, I've settled on picking up a .308 barrel (for my Encore) and running with it. Anything a 7mm can do can be done with a .30 caliber. At the end of the day, I'd be happier with a 180gr .30-caliber bullet moose hunting than with a 160gr 7mm bullet, though either will work. (Cue advice for monster magnums and big bores only for moose hunting here. ;) )

    As a bonus, .308 factory ammo is readily available. Either cartridge is a handloader's dream (as is the also very similar .260 Remington, a cartridge I love dearly but no longer own). Brass is a non-issue for a reloader; common .308 and .243 cases can be turned into either the 7mm or 6.5mm rounds easily.

    Yeah, flip a coin. I may still get a 7mm, but I doubt it!
     
  19. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    but for varminting up to white tails, with handloading , all time fave/ 6mm remmy.
     
  20. Colt46

    Colt46 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2003
    Messages:
    862
    For what you want

    the 7mm-08 will do everything the .308 will do with less recoil.
     
  21. AStone

    AStone Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    24,176
    Location:
    Far N, E coast
    A few months ago, I did exhaustive research on these two calibers, looking for that "perfect" centerfire rifle (because of my lifestyle, I only want one) for a "take any game in North America south of AK" rifle, mainly deer (whitetail, blacktail, mulie), antelope, and - in a pinch - elk (not high on my list).

    At least a few people contributing to this thread endured my never ending questions :banghead: trying to distinguish between .308 and 7mm08 with respect to trajectory, recoil, ammo availability, etc.

    At that time, I decided unequivocally it was going to be 7-08. I liked its trajectory and lesser recoil. I wasn't concerned about range of bullet size or ammo availability (since I planned to stockpile and ultimately reload).

    Since that time, in a quirk of fate, I've revised my plan. As soon as finances allow (soon, I hope), I'm going to invest in a Marlin 336 in .30-30. (I realized that, for my needs, hunting deer in dense temperate rainforests of my region, the .30-30 is a better option: the ammo is cheap and widely available, and I like levers better than bolts.)

    But suffice to say that, if I decide to add a second centerfire rifle to my toolkit for longer shots in more open country east of here, it'll be a 7mm-08.

    Nem
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2006
  22. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    21,688
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    If you're not reloading yourself the .308 is probably a better choice. Most factory ammo for the .308 is available in 125gr, 147gr, 150gr, 165/68gr and 180 gr giving you a wide variety of choices for different game. The 7mm-08 seems to come in mostly 140gr and Remington has a 120gr round.
     
  23. aspade

    aspade Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    254
    Location:
    People's Republik of Maryland
    IMO, the recoil and trajectory advantages of the 7-08 over its parent aren't big enough steps to be worth giving up the availability, variety, and reasonable price of .308 factory ammo.

    7mm 140s have a BC about 10% higher than .30 caliber 150s you can launch at about the same speed. This is meaningful when you're playing 600 yard silhouette games, but at 300 yards the difference is literally less than half an inch of drop and less than an inch of drift in a 10mph crosswind.

    Now take the same concept one step further to the .260 Rem and you're onto something.

    With 120 to 125 grain bullets, it essentially matches - even betters by an inconsequential bit - the 7-08/140 and 308/150 in trajectory with a further reduction in recoil while still carrying plenty of bullet for deer.

    With 95 to 100 grainers, it beats anything you can do with a 7-08 or 308 by 250-300fps and is head and shoulders a better long range varmint gun.

    For your stated applications, I can't imagine a better cartridge.
     
  24. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    .308 ammo is cheaper, and easy to come by almost everywhere, and it will do just fine at 300yds +.
     
  25. AStone

    AStone Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    24,176
    Location:
    Far N, E coast
    I totally hear what you .308 advocates are saying.

    And, I suspect that you're right, too, in most respects.

    Still, funny thing is, after reading so much about the two over months, for some unexplainable reason, probably in large part irrational intuition :rolleyes: , the 7-08 calls to me louder.

    But like I said earlier, I got other fish to fry first.

    <sounds like calling a dog>
    "Here, .30, .30, .30..."
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page