.32-20, any other rounds?

Status
Not open for further replies.
RC
With this much understood, can you recomend a site for information regarding the date of manufacure for this revolver? I read an earlier post from 'old fuff', something about early models not haveing a tempered cylinder. Should this be a concern?
 
Always check a prospective .32WCF FOR A Ringed/bulged barrel. Some of the old timers magnumized them with those rifle loads.
 
I highly suggest saving your brass even if you don't reload right now. If you decide to in the future you will have brass that's fairly hard to find used. Also, some commercial reloaders will load ammo for you at a discount if you have brass to turn in.
 
I highly suggest saving your brass even if you don't reload right now. If you decide to in the future you will have brass that's fairly hard to find used. Also, some commercial reloaders will load ammo for you at a discount if you have brass to turn in.
Thanks for the advice, I always save brass. I actually have a few buddies that reload my .30-06 shells, but none do 32-20.
 
Since you have a reloader I would buy a set of 32-20 dies for them so they can reload the ammo for you. At only $25.99 the dies are less than one box of ammo. Add some W231 powder and some .314" 100gr bullets and you're all set...
 
It likely can be shot with .32 shorts and longs if the rim diameter is sufficient to keep it from slipping forward into the chamber. I do not own a .32-20 and so can not determine this. The .32 colt and S&W cases may split and that is a potential danger that might get you hurt. You may be able to avoid case splitting by wrapping the cases in paper to increase their diameter. Not a safe thing to do but it will likely work if you really need the gun to go bang. Do not do this with the .32 HR Magnum since it has a much higher pressure.

Emphasis added
 
When I first looked online for ammo for my 1916 vintage Colt Police Positive Special .32-20 a few months ago, I didn't see anything hotter than the Remington or Winchester 100 gr @ 1200 fps rounds. For starters, I just tried a couple of the "cowboy" 800 fps loads. They are a little more interesting than shooting a .22LR, but not much.

A few weeks ago, this Load-X 100 gr. JHP round turned up. At first, they listed it @ 1600 fps. Now it says MV not available!

http://www.venturamunitions.com/32-20-winchester-100-grain-jhp-load-x-hi-speed/

The Rem/Win factory loads are in the speed range of a .32 H&R Magnum. If that 1600 fps number is real, these Load-X are cooking hotter than a .327 Federal Magnum!

Is this a return of the "rifle" load that will blow up pistols? Jacketed bullets would be nice, and there don't seem to be many loads available for .32-20 that are jacketed. The indoor range nearby doesn't allow all-lead bullets except in .22 rimfire. If they hadn't listed the MV at first, I'd have guessed that the warning about "modern firearms" in that link was intended to keep people from putting them in the blackpowder era handguns, but this sounds scary.
 
When in doubt, don't.

S&W does not recommend use of PlusP ammo in pre 1957 guns. That sure sounds like PlusP to me.
Any S&W 32-20 will be from 1942 or earlier. Smokeless powder was around for a quarter century before S&W started heat treating cylinders.

I would suggest that round is probably for use in Marlin 1894 Cowboy guns or the limited edition Ruger Vaquero 32-20 or BlackHawk 32-20 Convertible.

Added:
Should have also said, although you have a Colt, it is from the same era that I would consider 'dubious' for shooting with hot loads in a S&W. A Colt would not have had any major differences in steel from a S&W, both were and are quality manufacturers and would have used the best available. If one can bulge a barrel or blow a cylinder, so can the other.

Chuck Hawk's site notes a modern rifle only load similar to the one you are quoting, it runs pressures twice the industry maximum for .32-20.
http://www.chuckhawks.com/32-20.htm

I think this is a really _bad_ idea. I have two fingers out of action from an injury (not shooting related). I'd hate to see anyone lose the use of their fingers through a gun blowing up.
 
Last edited:
"The rifle loads that blow up pistols" are actually low-powered loads with the wrong powder. They would give an incomplete burn in revolvers and leave a bullet sticking in the barrel, and the next round would bulge the barrel.

Out of respect for your revolver's age, I wouldn't fire a 1600 fps round -- not because it would blow up the gun, but because the battering would eventurally effect the timing.
 
No, I won't be putting any of those in my pistol. The Rem/Win 100 gr or these are the most I would try:
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/49...115-grain-lead-flat-nose-box-of-50?cm_vc=S014

Ventura used to have Hunting Shack lead-free 60 gr. @ 850 fps, which would solve the leading problem but not the rimfire-like issue. There was also a Hunting Shack 100 gr. JHP, which I've forgotten the velocity of, but I don't think it was crazy. I don't see either of those available at any vendor now. Guess I'll learn to buy it when I can next time!

(Both Midway and Ventura list *all* .32-20 under "rifle ammunition," so I don't think that means anything.)
 
I wouldn't run any of those rifle only loads in a Colt Police Positive (or Army Special for that matter) but they would be fine in a smokeless Colt SAA.


What is wrong with a 100 grain bullet going at 950 fps as loaded by the major factories.
Nothing if that's enough. It's not enough for some folks and the cartridge is capable of so much more in a strong gun. Rifle or sixgun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top