Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.357 Ruger Redhawk

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by NuclearMeltdown, Jun 25, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. NuclearMeltdown

    NuclearMeltdown Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    77
    Saw one of these beasts with wooden grips and a 7.5" barrel today in a shop around here for $549. The cylinder walls were the thickest I've ever seen. What was the point of such an overbuilt revolver, or were they made just as a curiosity?
     
  2. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    That's odd.

    Was it a .357 Maximum, maybe?

    Of course, there are some very hot .357 Magnum loads that could benefit from it...

    Didn't know there ever was a Redhawk in .357.
     
  3. Shortdog22

    Shortdog22 member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Messages:
    64
    With 6 1/2 inch Blackhawk you can load to shoot flames out the end of the barrel a foot, no joke with no damage. There is no telling what you can do with a Redhawk.
     
  4. OFT

    OFT Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2008
    Messages:
    249
    I think that they made the 357 Redhawk with a 5 1/2" barrel also. Definately got enough meat there.
     
  5. OFT

    OFT Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2008
    Messages:
    249
    Delete.
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2008
  6. Blueduck

    Blueduck Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,184
    I think they were made in 357 just because the magnum "trio" of the time was 357, 41, and 44, so thats what Ruger chambered them for. Of course as time went on sales showed most shoppers did consider it overbuilt and over heavy for the 357 and that chambering option was dropped due to poor sales.

    Still a neat combo, and sought after by reloaders with a little mischevious nature :evil: Maybe even a better use is a shooter who can't take much recoil due to wrist or elbow problems. With that weight I'd bet Double Tap or Buffalo Bores hottest 357 loads kick like a 6 inch 686 shooting light 38 wadcutters.
     
  7. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    Check that it isn't for .357 Maximum. I think they only made those for 1 year or something. Might be collectible if it is.
     
  8. highlander 5

    highlander 5 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,307
    Location:
    lynn,ma
    I have a Redhawk in 357 mag and have put some loads that are quite stiff. over built is an overstatement. same frame cylinder and barrel was used for the entire Redhawk line. Too bad they don't make 'em like that anymore
     
  9. 19-3Ben

    19-3Ben Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,146
    Location:
    CT
    Yup. there was. A couple months back there was a guy who posted pics here of his. The .357 chambers in the cylinder looked almost like the chambers for .22lr in a k frame. The thing makes the Smith N frames look way underbuilt.

    I want one....really really badly.
     
  10. slick6

    slick6 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2004
    Messages:
    915
    Following are some pictures of my trio of .357 Redhawks. Two are the 5-1/2" barrel length and one is with the 7-1/2" barrel length.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    Here is a picture of a Ruger .357 Police Service-Six compared to one of my 5-1/2" Redhawk .357's! Although the Redhawk is in the background, just compare how much more meat there is on the cylinder around the cylinder holes, compared to the Police Service-Six .357!:
    [​IMG]
    Here is a picture of the opened cylinder on one of my .357 Redhawks:
    [​IMG]
    Here is a picture comparing the opened cylinder from my Smith & Wesson Model 27 compared to the Redhawk .357's opened cylinder. Notice how much more massive the Redhawk cylinder is!
    [​IMG]
     
  11. papajohn

    papajohn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2007
    Messages:
    433
    Location:
    Coastal Missouri
    slick6, I'm glad you were able to post those, most folks don't remember the 357 version, or think it was only made in 357 Max.....which it was never chambered in. I shot one back in '82, the first Redhawk I ever saw, and it wasn't much fun to wear on a belt holster, but it was a joy to shoot!

    In '87 I picked up a pair of 7.5" Redhawks, one in 41 Magnum, the other in 44. Even then, then 357 version was hard to find, they only made it for a year or two. I'd love to find one, but I have a feeling the price has gone up since '82..............;)

    PJ
     
  12. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    46,718
    Location:
    Alabama
    Prices are definitely up. Still looking for a good deal. I would like one to go with my .41 & .44.
     
  13. foghornl

    foghornl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    7,403
    Got to fondle a previuosly owned .357 Redhawk recently at local gunshop....

    Made my .357 Vaquero (2003 vintage on the .44Mag frame) feel like an old Mattel "Shootin' Shell Fanner 50"
     
  14. Moonclip

    Moonclip Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    2,766
    Location:
    USA
    I knew a guy that had the .357, I have the ,41mag. Only stronger .357 handgun I could maybe think of would be a Freedom Arms.
     
  15. rxraptor02

    rxraptor02 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    IN
    there is a .357 redhawk on gun broker right now....
     
  16. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    Redhawks were never chambered for .357 Maximum. That was a variation of the Blackhawk with an elongated frame and cylinder, made for only a short time.
     
  17. timothy75

    timothy75 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Messages:
    481
    Maybe their chambered for 353 casull and dont know it? Just kidding/ not funny.
     
  18. Bush Pilot

    Bush Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,608
    My local dealer USED to carry Redhawks in .357 all the time, never wanted one until they were discontinued. If that isn't the story of my life.
     
  19. Catherine

    Catherine member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    879
    Location:
    Montana
    Pretty pictures of your guns! Thank you.

    Catherine
     
  20. cottonmouth

    cottonmouth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    567
    Location:
    Barlow, Mississippi
    .357 Rh

    Here's my 5-1/2 inch RH in .357. They do handle the hot magnums well due to the extra weight and a 148 grain wadcutter is like shooting a .22 LR.

    J.B.
    [​IMG]
     
  21. rainman500_0

    rainman500_0 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    7
    Had One

    I had a 357 Redhawk back in the 80s, wish i had it back. Still have a few rounds left for it that would blow my L framed S&W
     
  22. Ben Shepherd

    Ben Shepherd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    4,755
    Location:
    Utah
    I have a couple of 'em. They are the heaviest redhawks ever built. Both good and bad there.

    The good?
    Hot handrolled stuff, cor-bon, and buffalo bore all feel like a touch more than current 38+p. Good gun to use when intoducing a novice/new shooter to the world of magnum handguns.

    The bad?

    All day carry requires, um, dedication in both gear and mindset. Did I mention they're heavy?
     
  23. DWFan

    DWFan Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    626
    My best friend had one back in 80's. When I'd brag about my Dan Wesson M40 Maximum SuperMag, he'd remind me that he had .357 Magnum handloads that were just as powerful. He decided that wasn't enough and rechambered it for the .357-44 Bain & Davis. The gun managed to disappear shortly after he passed away. Hands down the best Ruger I have ever shot.
     
  24. borntwice

    borntwice Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    230
    I used to have a Blackhawk in .357 mag., many years ago. Great "woods gun", but heavier than h*ll, and not comfortable to carry for long. I carried it anyway though, due to living in Grizzly bear country at the time. It was a difficult gun to shoot, probably mainly due to my lack of handgun training, at the time. I am now remedying the training situation, and have recently completed a Defensive Handgun 1 course.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page