Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

36 vs. 44 Caliber Cap and Ball

Discussion in 'Blackpowder' started by dispatch55126, Oct 5, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dispatch55126

    dispatch55126 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,228
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Which caliber would be more lethal within 20 yards?

    I know the physics would say the greater mass will win. However, with BP, the only force acting on it is the initial explosion and its the concussive force only that is driving it down the barrel.

    Given a Model 1858 in both calibers at full grain load (I'm not sure the exact amount, say 20-25 grains) Would the extra mass of the .44 reduce the effectiveness of the round or would the lethality be greater with the increased mass but slower speed?
     
  2. Tomahawk674

    Tomahawk674 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    Messages:
    540
    Location:
    St. Joseph, MO
    .44 revolvers hold more powder that the .36's, so a better way to formulate your question is, which is more lethal WITH the exact powder load and from the same barrel lenght?
     
  3. PRM

    PRM Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,060
    Thoughts

    Most will agree that the bigger the bullet at the velocities we are talking about will create a bigger wound channel, more damage resulting in more blood loss. But, as far as what is lethal and what is incapacitating will be dependent on shot placement and what is struck. A shot to the fleshy part of the extremities will not be as effective as one to the brain. Major bone structures will put a person down and past that your looking at arteries and vital organs where a person could continue to take action for a minute or more.

    Shoot accurate - Shoot till the threat no longer exist - Don't count on one shot stops regardless of calibre.
     
  4. Eric F

    Eric F Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,934
    more powder does not=more speed with a mass increase. But it could it depends upon how much more powder. Bottom line is both have killed and 1 shot stops are possible but not reliable.
     
  5. mec

    mec Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,459
    Right. They will both stick a deep hole in you and the rest depends on where the hole is and luck
     
  6. Marlin 45 carbine

    Marlin 45 carbine Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    2,477
    Location:
    South-Western North Carolina
    the .44 '58 Remmy will hold 32gr 3F and an overpowder wad then a Lee mold slug.
    I have personally shot this load through a jack pine that stopped a .357 mag 125 gr sjhp.
    sort of like comparing apples and oranges I suppose but just says the .44 C&B revolvers do have some clout.
    I have the 'Buffalo Hunter' 12" bbl model w/a stainless steel cylinder.
     
  7. dwave

    dwave Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,046
    Location:
    The wonderful United States
    Perhaps not BUT More Mass at the same speed will to more damage.

    IE
    147 gr. @ 800 FPS > 88 gr. @ 800 FPS.
     
  8. Voodoochile

    Voodoochile Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,144
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Like was mentioned before one shot stops are possible but not reliable & that multiple shots into a single target may be necessary even with the most powerful of handguns but many will say "I mayself included" that a larger more heavier bullet gives the shooter more of a chance to inflict a more incapcitating wound than a smaller & lighter bullet.

    With that said though I also agree that shot placement is key in either scenerio to a sucessful incapacitating hit to the target.

    My Pietta '58 Remmy W/ 5-1/2" barrel likes a 30gr. FFFG Goex & a 220gr. .456 Lee Conical load, spits them out at around 700fps. & 240ft. lbs. which I would say is quite deadly, I'm not sure what kind of penetration it would have exactly but it will penetrate through almost 24 inches of compressed cardboard & magazines at 15 yards.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2008
  9. dispatch55126

    dispatch55126 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,228
    Location:
    Minnesota
    One other questions on loading preference.

    I load my cylinders powder, lubed wad, ball. Does everyone do it this way or do you load powder, ball, wad?
     
  10. PRM

    PRM Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,060
    Loading

    The wad goes between the powder and ball. If your not using a wad - most put some type of lube (Crisco, etc...) on top of the ball.
     
  11. mykeal

    mykeal Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    5,147
    Location:
    Michigan
    IF you are using a lubed wad, the preferred method is powder, wad, ball.
     
  12. dispatch55126

    dispatch55126 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,228
    Location:
    Minnesota
    That's what I do, just curious. The reason I ask is I currently have a 1851 Confederate Navy and was looking to get a Model 1858. I already have the .44 so I'm debating if I should stick with it or get a .36
     
  13. Sistema1927

    Sistema1927 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    4,591
    Location:
    "Land of (dis)Enchantment"
    Here is what Randolph Marcy had to say in The Prairie Traveler in 1859:

    Notwithstanding Colt's army and navy sized revolvers have been in use for a long time in our army, officers are by no means of one mind as to their relative merits for frontier service. The navy pistol, being more light and portable, is more convenient for the belt, but it is very questionable in my mind whether these qualities counterbalance the advantages derived from the greater weight of powder and lead that can be fired from the larger pistol, and the consequent increased projectile force.

    This point is illustrated by an incident which fell under my own observation. In passing near the "Medicine-Bow Butte" during the spring of 1858, I most unexpectedly encountered and fired at a full-grown grizzly bear; but, as my horse had become somewhat blown by a previous gallop, his breathing so much disturbed my aim that I missed the animal at the short distance of about fifty yards, and he ran off. Fearful, if I stopped to reload my rifle, the bear would make his escape, I resolved to drive him back to the advanced guard of our escort, which I could see approaching in the distance; this I succeeded in doing, when several mounted men, armed with the navy revolvers, set off in pursuit. They approached within a few paces, and discharged ten or twelve shots, the most of which entered the animal, but he still kept on, and his progress did not seem materially impeded by the wounds. After these men had exhausted their charges, another man rode up armed with the army revolver, and fired two shots, which brought the stalwart beast to the ground. Upon skinning him and making an examination of the wounds, it was discovered that none of the balls from the small pistols had, after passing through his thick and tough hide, penetrated deeper than about an inch into the flesh, but that the two balls from the large pistol had gone into the vitals and killed him. This test was to my mind a decisive one as to the relative efficiency of the two arms for frontier service, and I resolved thenceforth to carry the larger size.
     
  14. PRM

    PRM Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,060
    Great Read

    Sistema1927, I just got that book off of Amazon about a month ago - great read. A lot of neat areas are covered. Unique insights into the Western Frontier.
     
  15. trickshot

    trickshot Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Messages:
    136
    Location:
    Iowa
    If your hunting grizzly bear, the 36 caliber is a poor choice. But in the 19th century the 36 caliber Colt Navy was the pistol preferred by many of the men who saw a lot of action in the civil war and on the Western frontier. Its really just a matter of personal preference.
     
  16. Bezoar

    Bezoar member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,616
    well its been driven home here so many times that when it comes to handgun wound charecteristics, the only thing you have to count on is permanent wound channel. bigger and object passing through tissue and bone, the bigger the hole you get.
     
  17. Elbert P . Suggins

    Elbert P . Suggins Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    300
    Location:
    Reubens, Idaho
    Just this spring after butchering pigs, and before discarding the guts, I took three heads and used them for target practice most of the afternoon. I didn't use a 36 cal. but I used a Pietta 58 Remington pushing a .454 roundball and 30 grains of Goex. I got consistent deep penetration at ten feet but no exit wounds except one instance where I believe that ball followed the path of one previous. And all penetrated deep into brain tissue after going thru a pretty thick skull. In fact the 3rd pig I dropped with the 44 between the eyes instead of the usual 22 hollowpoint. By the way you got to try pork sausage links made up with Halapeno and Cheddar. Beyond description!
     
  18. pohill

    pohill Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,853
  19. JNewell

    JNewell Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,714
    Location:
    Land of the Bean & the Cod
    At these velocities, it's all about hole size, most other things being equal. I'd rather have a .44 miss me than a .36 hit me, but if put in the same place the subject is likely to bleed out faster after a .44 caliber hit.
     
  20. Snaggletooth

    Snaggletooth Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    381
    Location:
    Missouri Ozarks
    I believe that history records the answer. During the Philippine Insurection the Moros were wraping their bodies in muslin before an attacl. The .36 cal werent doing their job. A larger bore pistol was brought to the fight. I believe it was an R&S .44 It stopped the Morros. When they were hit they went down. That was in a history that I read a long time ago.
     
  21. Voodoochile

    Voodoochile Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,144
    Location:
    Central Virginia
    Actually it was a little more recent than you think Snaggletooth, 1899-1902 & we were using a Dubble Action Colt Revolver chambered in the .38 Long Colt & then they reissued the Colt 1873 SAA in .45 Colt in responce to the insignificant stoping power of the then standard side arm & load.
     
  22. Snaggletooth

    Snaggletooth Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    381
    Location:
    Missouri Ozarks
    My old memory comes and goes on somethings. Think Im getting senile. I know I have senior moments. That was in a Marine Corps history book. I thought it was the R&S but your correct. I know that a 1911 Colt will thru and thru in the chest. I was USMC 1950 til 1971
     
  23. Claude Clay

    Claude Clay Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,700
    Location:
    CT
    36 vrs 44
    9 vrs 45

    whats coming next to debate should be interesting
     
  24. JNewell

    JNewell Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,714
    Location:
    Land of the Bean & the Cod
    The fact that the debate goes back to cap & ball days should tell us sommething... ;)

    BTW, although everyone here knows this already, for the record, 9mm is ~.36 caliber (.355, to be exact, vs. .357).
     
  25. Tomahawk674

    Tomahawk674 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    Messages:
    540
    Location:
    St. Joseph, MO
    .31 cal wins all hands down. Buy a Remington pocket if you want serious firepower. Watch out for the recoil though, you need man wrists to shoot it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page