38 special pellet ammo?

Status
Not open for further replies.

printcraft

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
63
Location
Indiana
Years ago a guy at work had ammo in his revolver that contained
2 or more? 38 sized lead balls. Said it was a specialty ammo
for home defense that would not be as prone to blow through someone and
through the next wall in a house environment.
It was not the shot shell ammo. Anybody heard of this stuff?
 
It was a regular practice at one time to load a single 000 buckshot (.350"d) ina .38 Special as a low cost, low power, short range practice round.

Your co-worker may have had a pair of 000 buck . . . or maybe even this gimmick:
http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=55758

For defensive uses, I'd much prefer a full power 125 or 140 JHP.
 
I have seen it, but do not remember who made it.

Someone used to make a mold for a very light weight wadcutter. You could load 3 in a .38 Spl case or 4 in a .357 Mag case. Pretty neat concept. I believe I saw it in G&A years ago.
 
It was not the shot shell ammo. Anybody heard of this stuff?
Yes, I've been hand-loading it for 40 years. I called them duplex or house loads. Over the years I gave many of these rounds to friends for their house guns.

Originally I used 3 Buckshot but now days I use two light weight bullets.

I've never had the opportunity to test for penetration but did chronograph the load years ago. Lost the results in a fire but first time I remember, when I have the chronograph set up, I'll measure the MV from the 2-3-4 and 6 inch barrels.

The accuracy is pretty good out to about 15 yards, especially with the two bullets.
 
I'd love to hear how that turns out. I'm a total fiend for the .357 snubbies and plan on picking up a couple before the year is out and would love to know if I could fire a few wadcutters out of a single shot of .357 magnum, for up-close personal purposes when one shot might be all you get. If you could get three(maybe even four, hey I'm greedy) out of a snubby at 850fps(maybe even 950) would be just nasty <giggles>. If it's a matter of pain on the hands, so long as the gun doesn't explode or get ruined after a few shots, no pain no glory.
 
I'm a total fiend for the .357 snubbies and plan on picking up a couple before the year is out and would love to know if I could fire a few wadcutters out of a single shot of .357 magnum, for up-close personal purposes when one shot might be all you get.
I'm sure at one time or another I loaded 357 cases with multi balls but don't remember off hand the results.
What you have to be careful about is not getting the pressure too high with too heavy a bullet load.

I've got some 38 Special loaded, from a few years back, and I'll try to do a little testing in the next couple days and post the results in this thread or maybe start another thread.
 
I have a book somewhere that showed drilling a hole in a board, then pounding buckshot into the hole to shape it to the dia, then stacked them in a Speer Shot capsule. Total weight determined the load. He also showed some special H&G moulds that had short wadcutters including a topper with a point.
 
I have a book somewhere that showed drilling a hole in a board, then pounding buckshot into the hole to shape it to the dia, then stacked them in a Speer Shot capsule.

I just use a Lyman sizer/lubricator and size them to .357.
I also put a little bullet lube between the balls to prevent barrel leading from the soft lead buckshot.

I sometimes use the Speer capsules for shot loads but prefer using gas checks over the powder and shot. The capsules reduce the amount of shot a little.
 
A single 000 buckshot is almost exactly .357 and weighs about 70 grains. (2 X 70 = 140!!!! or about exactly a 'normal' .38 bullet weight.)

Alternatley, a speer shot capsule will hold three #1 buckshot. (Don't remember the weight.)

A light, target weight load of Bullseye and you have some neat 'playtime' loads.

Don't ask me how I know this stuff and DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME. hehe
 
Remington used to offer this load with two balls in 38 Special and three balls in 357 magnum. Accuracy was fairly good up to 25 yards.
 
yeah house load

The guy called them house loads too. I did not see or I don't remember the
head stamp to see who might have made them.
On the sportsman guide site, same concept but not with the plastic cap.
Bare lead on the ones I saw.

What would be the advantage of 2 lighter chunks flying at close distance?
Would they have any spread at house range or would they just stack back to back at impact? I suppose a snub would spread before a 6".
 
the lighter projectiles would have less penetration than one heavier thus limiting the chance of going through a wall and hitting an innocent
 
Remington's old load used round balls.
Winchester made a multi-bullet load for .38 Special about the same time. Maybe .357 too, but I don't remember.

They had three? I think, short pointed wadcutters nested one on top of the next one.
Like little cones, with wadcutter shoulders!

They actually did work, and would cluster the three bullets in a nice group at 7 yards, but the individual bullets were too light to offer much penetration.

I still have a few of them around here somewhere.

rcmodel
 
What OFT said, except that I believe that both had only two 000 buckshot.

I still have a couple or three of the 20-rd. boxes in .357 from a while back.

They're labeled:

357 Magnum
Multiball Load
Two 70 gr. 000 Buckshot
(140 gr. Payload) R357MB

It's been awhile since I fired any, but IIRC they'd keep both balls in the torso A-zone of a silhouette out to about 10 yds pretty well. Past that the spread opened up dramatically. My guess is that those balls are just enough undersized that they don't get 'spun' well enough to stablize.

I used to keep them in an old 2" M-19 I had in my nightstand back when i lived in apartments.

IIRC, there were some other 'multi-projectile' loads offered commercially back in the day that featured two or more lead slugs "nested" to form a kind of WC shape and seated the same way in the case. Somewhat 'massier' than the buckshot, but they still spread out quickly and the resulting impact patterns weren't very predictable once the range got much over the length of a hallway.
 
I did a little checking this morning.

I have three different loads made up.
All are two ball/bullets.
1st Two 36 cal lead balls, sized to .357.
2nd A lead Makarov bullet and a 36 cal ball, both sized to .357.
3rd A Hornady JHP Makarov bullet and 36 cal lead ball, both sized to .357.

I remembered why I stopped using three balls. If I used a 36 cal black powder ball sized down to .357 the balls were still too big to stack 3 in a 38 case and the total weight was also too great. I believe I did successfully use this load in .357 cases.
If I used three smaller balls on the 38 I still couldn't load to standard muzzle velocity and the accuracy suffered.

So in order to get max velocity and accuracy (but with a little spread I went to bullets like the 95 grain 9x18 (Makarov) LRN and JHP, paired with a single ball or short lead SWC bullet.
This way the individual bullets were still fairly heavy and accurate, while keeping the operating pressure in limits.

The velocities are as high or higher than most 38 loads from a 2 inch barrel and the bullets are up to 95 grains in weight, so the load should be effective.
10 centered holes from a 5 shot gun isn't bad.:)

Here's a couple targets I shot this morning.
I only shot close up, 7 yards, since I think the load's primary use is for shooting across the living room.

38doublebulletload.gif

38doublebulletload2JPG.gif
 
Mainmech48, you may be right. I've been asleep a few times since then.
 
And if you're reading this and are into .44's on the same site, under .429, see 429-80 stack. Same thing, built to stack. and you can get it in a multi cavity mold so it doesn't take weeks to cast enough. I have a Lee 358-77-SWC single cavity and it's mind numbing trying to cast enough to load just one box worth.
 
M2Carbine,
We appreciate the time, trouble, pics, and info on your above thread.

You mentioning the 9x18.........I feel that cartridge (with a single bullet, that is) is inherently accurate. I wish somebody would make a target/bullseye grade gun, revolver perhaps, for that cartridge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top