Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

380 Mousegun

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by earlthegoat2, Dec 7, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. earlthegoat2

    earlthegoat2 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,514
    Location:
    SE GA
    I am quite concerned. There seems to be an epidemic of pocket 380s. Is it the perfect caliber and gun? Why is there so much demand for these guns? Is it the price, or the size, or the feel? At my local gunshop they cant keep these in stock. Just like everywhere probably. They dont have to be pocket guns either. If it says 380 its as good as gone yesterday. Even a 500 dollar IMI Micro Desert Eagle. Why do we feel we have to abide by the minimum acceptable standards. If you ask someone why they carry it they say because its so small and can go in a pocket. Many have said the 380 is not at acceptable power levels for self defense yet this does not seem to be affecting anyone. Its either just barely not enough or just barely enough. I say its not enough by far.

    Its barely enough to meet the first rule of a gunfight. I see it this way: If you are so concerned about the size of your gun then you automatically have to be concerned about the power level because small size generally equals small power. So you are OK with starting out at a disadvantage. Then theres the group that just got their CCW/CPL and need a carry gun. This fills the bill immediately. No need to find a holster for that Glock or 1911 now. Just throw it in a pocket holster and into the pocket it goes.

    Im starting to get leery of the 380 crowd because if they like not putting thought into their method of carry or their carry piece are they putting effort into training with it. Those CCW/CPL classes are all well and good but you need to practice with your carry rig all the time. Unfortunately not many do. They get the license and get the gun and put it in their pocket and wait to be unprepared for a fight they cannot be prepared for without training.

    Obviously the 380 Mousegun will not be the preferred choice of person with the warrior mindset or any gunfighting practitioner. It is slow to deploy and slow to stop. Double taps may bring things into balance if very well placed. I guess the long and short of it is that carrying a gun is all about compromise. But I just feel that the 380 is a bad compromise.

    Naturally, just opinions.
     
  2. don95sml

    don95sml Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    270
    Location:
    Near Roanoke, VA
    As you probably already realize, you will get a wide range of responses from those who would settle for .22 caliber to those who want 10mm or even more powerful. I can't buy your analysis in its entirety. I shoot IDPA matches with a 9mm SIG P239, so I get a lot of practice with that weapon. I actually carry a .380 SIG P230 because it is more easily concealable, and I feel it is enough gun in the environment in which I live. The beauty of this arrangement is that these two pistols operate identically (DA/SA), have operating levers in the same location, etc. This means that while I only shoot my carry gun at the range a couple of times a year, my more frequent practice with the 9mm insures that I still will be proficient with the carry gun if the situation requires.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2008
  3. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    It is hardly the ideal gun or caliber, but its small size makes it easier to carry, helping ensure you will always have something. Also, a .380 has more power than the .25s or .32s that used to be the standard for these pocket guns.
     
  4. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    beats

    a rock
     
  5. sniper7369

    sniper7369 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    116
    Location:
    The People's Republik of New York
    The .380 may not be ideal, but it beats the heck out of using harsh language and a stick. I carry a KT P-3AT (and sometimes a P-32) as a BUG to my G30. I really think if you were to dump six of those 90gr CorBon rounds into a guys thoracic cavity that he would probably stop what he was doing that made you shoot him. :)
     
  6. gbelleh

    gbelleh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,747
    Location:
    Kansas
    The little .380s make great BUGs. Way better to have a .380 than nothing.

    Just because someone carries a .380 doesn't mean they don't practice or are ill-prepared.

    It's always good to have choices in the carry rotation.

    Some people collect pocket guns.

    The .380 might not be the most effective pistol round, but it's far from harmless.

    Thank goodness for the variety we have. If you don't like .380, you don't have to buy one.
     
  7. Marcus L.

    Marcus L. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    396
    Location:
    Florida
    If you can carry a 9mm or .38spl, you would be better off. Most 9mm loads will penetrate around 13" in bare gel while expanding to around .60-.65". A .38spl will usually penetrate to around 12" and expand to around .60". A decent .380acp round will penetrate to about 11" and expand to about .50". The best documented loads are the Hornady 90gr XTP, and the new Hornady 90gr FTX which have the best combination of penetration and expansion.:
    http://www.hornady.com/images/sell_sheets/09-critical_defense.pdf

    However, the .380acp is pretty weak with any load against windsheilds and other commonly encountered barriers.

    So, there is a terminal effects advantage to using 9mm or .38spl.

    I wouldn't want to use a .380acp for duty or serious defense work, but I like to use it for a small pistol to carry around when I don't expect to be running into trouble. It's lighter and easier to conceal than a 9mm or .38spl. Normally, I carry a P239 9mm off duty, but when I'm wearing light clothing and am more focused on comfort than anything else, I don't feel undergunned when my purpose is to escape danger.
     
  8. eldogg

    eldogg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    nc
    my mouse gun is a beretta tomcat 32 apc. i load it with a mixture of 71 grn. ball and 60 grn. xtp's. practice practice practice, and it will do the job.
     
  9. benderx4

    benderx4 Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,276
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Geesh, I probably shouldn't mention that my summer carry is a Seecamp .32. I figure it's better than a sharp stick in the eye.
     
  10. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,376
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    We're not gunfighters and warriors. We're armed citizens, and many of us have weighed the odds of ever actually needing the gun against the incuberance of carrying something more potent.

    The .380 performs adequately so long as the target is not wearing really heavy clothing. That's why folks like me often do carry a .380 in the summer months, but switch to something larger when cooler weather sets in and heavier clothing allows the concealment of a larger weapon. As well, the likelihood of the threat wearing a heavy jacket or coat in winter moths justifies the more potent rounds.
     
  11. buttrap

    buttrap Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,088
    Location:
    Oregon
    Most people dont end up defending their life against windsheilds or barrers. They just want a small easy to hide gun just in case is all and it sure beats peeing on their shoes. I would think you whack a Star Fire JHP in a guys air intake at 4 feet he probably will not go oh my thats a .380 and laugh it off.
     
  12. moooose102

    moooose102 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,024
    Location:
    West Michigan
    for me, the 380 is all about the size. if it were larger, i would have a different gun. it is the MINIMUM caliber i will carry, to protect me and my loved ones. if they made a 45 that was this size, even if it hurt like he!! to shoot (which it would!), i would carry that instead. in the cooler months, i usually do carry my 45. but sometimes, i just cant conceal it well. that is where the 380 really shines. and, by the way, i load alternating fmj and hp pills. i want both penetration, and expansion. since you will probably only realisticly get one or the other with a 380, i do both, just double tap!
     
  13. usp9

    usp9 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,679
    Location:
    Bowling Green, Va
    That is a false assumption.
     
  14. Funderb

    Funderb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,104
    Location:
    Jacksonville, Bold new city of the south.
    .380 is a pretty good round.

    I think you are stuck on .25acp there partner.
     
  15. kokapelli

    kokapelli Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,605
    Location:
    Arizona
    Personally I don't like having a 9mm or larger pistol stuck down my pants here in Arizona where it gets to 110º + in the summer.

    I decided long ago that I was not going to have a gun determine how I dressed.

    If I know I will be in an unsafe area I'll have a PM9 in my pocket with something larger in my car, otherwise my P-3AT is my always gun.

    I have twice avoided a potential problem by simply pulling my P-3AT partially out of my pocket and the fact that I was armed seemed to be enough.
     
  16. schnarrgj

    schnarrgj Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Saint Peters, MO
    There were a whole lot of assumptions in your statement. What bothered me the most is your statement "Those CCW/CPL classes are all well and good but you need to practice with your carry rig all the time. Unfortunately not many do. They get the license and get the gun and put it in their pocket and wait to be unprepared for a fight they cannot be prepared for without training." I would wager that there are just as many if not more who do not train and cannot shoot the larger callibers. When I am at the range, I see more often than not, people with their pistols who cannot hit the target with any consitancy. Shot placement is the key. If you just buy a handgun, start carring it and not practice, you are kidding yourself that the caliber alone will win. Double tap? They would be lucky to hit a semi. Very often lesser calibers are often easier to learn to shoot , shoot well and get off a second shot quicker. I and my wife are comfortable carrying a 380. We practice and practice often.I am just as concerned with those who scoff at the lesser calibers and tout the larger to the untrained who may not have the skills to shoot them well and are unable to because of their inability to handle the muzzle blast and recoil.

    The 380 is capable and has shown it for many a year. Remember shot placement it the key.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2008
  17. Jason M

    Jason M Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    171
    Location:
    Central Florida
    I usually like to read every post before I chime in, but I’ll just jump right in here.

    I can’t buy hardly anything you said. Firstly, .380 is not a “mouse gun”. The pompous .45ACP and .40S&W crowd would say something like that. A pistol and its ammunition have one job and that is to inflict mortal damage on a HUMAN target. It was the purpose of their design from the beginning. If the pistol is chambered in whatever caliber (meaning modern pistols, mostly), it will do the job. A caliber does not gain notoriety and popularity because it FAILS to do the job it was designed to do. It really is that simple.

    On conceal-ability, the .380 is a great compromise over even a 9mm. The .380 is advantageous in that is the most powerful cartridge you can chamber a pistol for and still have the pistol a simple, straight blow-back design without making the gun weigh 2 pounds (see Hi-Point firearms). This makes the gun thinner, shorter and easier to conceal because of those reasons.

    The con, however, fall to the poor ballistic coefficients of .380ACP bullets. The 90gr pills are rather short and thusly have poor flight characteristics. The longer the bullet is, the better penetrating power it can have (this is one reason why an arrow may go right through a black bear but FMJ .460 Ruger round may not, even though the .460 has WAY more energy than the arrow).

    Calling .380 a “mouse gun” is a statement from the uniformed. And I actually do not own a .380ACP pistol. I carry 9mm, .40 and .45 and I still advocate .380 as perfectly acceptable.
     
  18. huntsman

    huntsman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,455
    Location:
    ohio's northcoast
    I believe that is exactly who Mr. Browning designed the caliber for.
     
  19. skeptiq

    skeptiq Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    147
    I agree with most of what JasonM said, however, I was of the assumption that "mouse gun" refers to the size of the gun, not the caliber (please correct me if I am wrong).

    I do not have my carry permit (yet), so I have not purchased my carry piece yet. I am however researching them now so I know what I want when the time gets closer.

    My debate with a carry piece is between the 380 and 9mm. I am looking at: Bersa 380 and Kel Tec PF9. The major decision for me is going to be based more on if I want a different caliber or not. My current handgun is a 9mm, so I am debating from more of an ammunition standpoint. Would I rather have to buy one type of ammo for both my guns, or different ammo for HD than my carry gun. Right now I am leaning towards having just 9mm's, but it has nothing to do with 380 being "inferior" as some would put it.

    10.5 inches of penetration is plenty, just ask my wife (sorry couldn't help myself). But seriously, I am pretty sure there isn't one person saying a 380 is not good enough that would stand in front of one.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2008
  20. SniperStraz

    SniperStraz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    851
    LMAO
     
  21. jocko

    jocko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,707
    have to agree witk koka on that. I won't dress to carry, haven't in 46 years and don't intend to now.

    46 years ago we had very little choice for a pocket gun, today they abound for what ever dollar you want to spend. The 380 is my lowest I will go to carry, but my preference is my PM9 which can ride in my front pocket 24/7, if not that then indeed my lcp 380.
     
  22. Mad Magyar

    Mad Magyar Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,967
    Location:
    Arizona
    How wrong was the adage about your pistol should "be comforting & not comfortable". Pistoleros do want comfort & carry a package that is relatively stout. The .380 does fit the bill and mfgr's are making killing on this demand. However, my .380 pocket-rocket goes by the wayside in cold weather making room for larger calibers due to better concealment: more clothes.:)
     
  23. krs

    krs Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,588
    Location:
    Tall Trees
    .

    This is always commendable; concern is good.


    OK fine.

    Yes.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2008
  24. PRM

    PRM Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,060
    Yep - small has to go!

    Attire is everything!

    If my humor is unappreciated - still have a Merry Christmas
     

    Attached Files:

  25. vintage sportsman

    vintage sportsman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    7
    Sta away from the PPK/S, am waiting for UPS to come drag it away to S&W. Has broken twice in lessa than 50 rds?! Nice little carry gun, but not worth a thing if they don't function - comments?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page