Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

4", 6" or 8" Barrel for .22LR Plinker

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by deleteall, Dec 20, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. deleteall

    deleteall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    85
    I'm looking to get a .22LR revolver for general target shooting and plinking. In short, something just for fun.

    The plan was to get a used S&W or Colt, but I'm not sure about the barrel length. All of my prior revolvers have been centerfire with a 3" or 4" barrel, so I lean toward a 4" barrel, but since It's not like I'm using it to "train" for my other revolvers, I can also see the benefit in a 6" or 8" barrel.

    I noticed 6" guns do tend to be a bit pricier, but not that much more. Assuming gun costs are the same, any thoughts on the best barrel length or will it even matter? Thanks.
     
  2. wrs840

    wrs840 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,921
    Location:
    Brushy Mts, NC, growing feed-crops.
    5".

    Couldn't help myself. :D

    Les
     
  3. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,721
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    There isn't that much difference between a 4" barrel and a 6" barrel. Ask yourself this, are your current 6" barreled guns inconvienient? Is there a time when you wish you had a shorter barrel? If the answer is yes, then go with the 4".

    But if the answer is no, then there is no penalty for 2" more sight radius.
     
  4. TrakHack

    TrakHack Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2010
    Messages:
    138
    Location:
    Nebraska
    If I wanted to spend the extra money to get something just for target shooting I would probably do 6". 4" would be too close to what I already have (my .22 has a 3" barrel), and 8" is a bit too unwieldy for me.
     
  5. gotboostvr

    gotboostvr Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,595
    Location:
    Buckeye Country
    I bought a Heritage Arms Rough Rider, It's a SAA "Clone" with a transfer bar safety. I got it with the standard sights, and a 6 inch barrel. I paid 140 for it with a .22LR and a .22MAG cylinder.

    Personally, I'd go with the 6in barrel again, get both cylinders, but I'd splurge for the adjustable sights. This gun is ridiculously fun I spent a few hours and 1K rounds through it at the range not too long ago and had one helluva time.
     
  6. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,450
    Location:
    TN
    A 4 or 6-inch barrel works for me. For a "range" gun, I would probably lean toward a 6" barrel, but I absolutely love my Smith M57 with an 8 3/8" barrel. The only Colt DA revolver that comes to mind with a longer than 6" barrel is the Trooper Mark III. Got nickel one in 22WMR with the 8" barrel. But it is not a shooter for me.
     
  7. dewalt-2

    dewalt-2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    Messages:
    210
    For just plain fun, a long barrel is great. My 9.5" Single Six...
    006-8.gif
    When squirrel season is over in Feb., the scope will come off and irons back on for plinking.
     
  8. Rembrandt

    Rembrandt Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,368
  9. jad0110

    jad0110 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,048
    Location:
    Somewhere between the Eastern Block states and Flo
    To help narrow down your search, do you have a preference as far as DA or SA?
     
  10. Waywatcher

    Waywatcher Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,563
    Location:
    WI
    I've always been partial to the 4 inch.

    5 or 5 1/2 is a close second. 6 is ok.

    8 is just too long for me.
     
  11. deleteall

    deleteall Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    85
    I'm looking for a DA revolver. I expect it'll be shot about 75% in SA, but I do like shooting in DA as well.

    "I would probably lean toward a 6" barrel, but I absolutely love my Smith M57 with an 8 3/8" barrel."

    I actually ran across an M57 with 8 3/8 barrel locally for $525. I was just hesitant about the barrel length since it seemed a bit too much. You like it though?
     
  12. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,986
    Location:
    northern california
    I'm not going to be a lot of help, but I'll offer some guidance in how to choose....it is all about the balance in your hand.

    I have two go to .22lr DA revolvers: a 4" Colt Diamondback and a 6" S&W M-17. They both balance very much the same as the 4" tube is heavier with it's underlug.

    I tried a 6" Diamondback when they came out and it was just too nose heavy, I also tried a 4" M-18 and it didn't have enough front weight.

    If I had it to do over again, I would be very tempted to seek out a Dan Wesson .22lr Pistol Pack...besides the different barrel lengths, it was also available with heavy and light barrel shrouds to tailor it's balance to your preference
     
  13. CajunBass

    CajunBass Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    5,690
    Location:
    North Chesterfield, Virginia
    I don't think it makes much practical difference. If you're shooting seriously, a longer barrel gives you a longer sight radius and in theory more precise sight alignment, but for plinking I doubt it makes a lot of difference.

    For what it's worth, most of my 22 handguns are in the 5-6" barrel range.
     
  14. GUNKWAZY

    GUNKWAZY Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2004
    Messages:
    976
    Location:
    AZ
    They are all fun.
    I have a custom S&W 8 3/8 inch model 17 that is almost boring it's such a good shooter.
    Then, like you, I wanted to know if a shorter barrel would be more fun. So, I went out and found a 4 inch S&W model 18. Turns out they are both equally as much fun.
    I think I enjoy the shorter barrel just a little bit more for just being able to whip that short barrel around easier and hit multiple targets.
    Here's a couple pics.
    Both are very accurate guns.
    Good luck on your choice.

    model17.jpg

    model18.jpg

    Jeff (GUNKWAZY)
     
  15. Stainz

    Stainz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,117
    Location:
    Pinson, AL
    I finally bought my first decent .22 revolver - a 4" 617 - new 9/08. It was followed a year later by the then only SS J-frame choice, a LNIB 5" 63 from a friend's estate. Both got larger grips, lighter springs, and HiViz front sights. Great plinkers - but I kept thinking how nice the 3" 317K would be - if it was in SS! Then - last January - S&W announced a new 3" 63 for 2010. Unfortunately, they were a tad slow in their building them, not shipping until last month. My back-ordered one arrived just before Thanksgiving - and was an instant hit.

    IMG_4554.jpg

    It looks different now, as I have since added a set of the 60 Pro wood grips from S&W. I put 200 more rounds downrange with it yesterday - making 500+ since it's first cleaning - maybe 700+ since new - all Fed 36gr HP's from WallyWorld 550 packs (Yeah, I spend the money on the revolver - then it's el-cheapo for ammo!). The 60 Pro grips really help, too, as I found out yesterday. Oddly, my lockwork is factory stock - and still as good as my tricked-out 5" 63. I don't know how much lighter it would be with other springs - the stock 5" 63 was like the stock 317K's I've pulled the trigger on - horrid DA. Far better now - but that 3" 63 was better right 'out of the box'. Of course, the 4" 617 is better still.

    Now - barrel lengths... the 4" 617 will likely be here when the others are gone - supurb range gun. The 5" 63 probably points better, but it's larger 'square conversion' Hogues are still rubber - and I am not fond of rubber grips. The 3" 63 is so handy - and a super-natural pointer. It's hard to put down. Of course, the X8 DS-10 speedloader and 4 x 8 base plate help there, as does the 60 Pro wood grip. A 6" 617 is too 'front heavy' for me. Sorry, not much help, other than to say that I'd probably opt for a 3" 63 or 4" 617 - but a good price on a 5" 63, no longer available new, would be an attention getter, too.

    I did have a beauty of a Ruger SS - but I was tired of SA's. I love DA shooting - probably 99% of my shooting is such.

    Stainz
     
  16. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,233
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    "I have a custom S&W 8 3/8 inch model 17 that is almost boring "

    True, I have my father's Model 17-4 with an 8-3/8" barrel and a 2x Burris scope.

    You want really boring, try a S&W 647 K-frame. It's a .17 HMR with an 8-3/8" barrel and a scope. It was my father's too. I replaced the rebound spring for him when it was new and got the SA pull down to 2.5#. He was 80-something and shot from the bench. He'll be 89 in two weeks, but doesn't shoot anymore.

    I also have a 4" Model 17-6 and a 38-year-old 5.5" Single Six Convertible.

    I think I need a 6" K-22 to fill the gap. :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page