Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

40 GAP subcompact, why not?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Josey, Mar 30, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Josey

    Josey member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,476
    Location:
    Catfish Co, KY
    I was wondering if Glock might create a 40 GAP. I could see some possibilities for very small framed, short barell autos. A sub 3" XD with one in the tube and a five round mag?
     
  2. Croyance

    Croyance Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,160
    I believe a .40 GAP is called the 9 mm. Look at the .45 GAP compared to the .45 ACP.
    And this is kind of a semi-auto thing.
     
  3. Josey

    Josey member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,476
    Location:
    Catfish Co, KY
    If you shorten the 40 case and load itto +P+ pressure, it isn't a 9MM. The 610 from S&W is a revolver. The Ruger 38-40/40 single action is a revolver. I was simply musing that the 40 GAP could be the next great idea from Glock. Small semi-autos are possible in such a caliber.
     
  4. Preacherman

    Preacherman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,309
    Location:
    Louisiana, USA
    I don't believe it would be practical. The .40 S&W is already a shortened version of the 10mm. Auto - so to shorten it any further would be shortening on top of the shortening! I don't see any point to it, and besides, to achieve any meaningful ballistics out of a shorter round would be pretty difficult.
     
  5. Josey

    Josey member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,476
    Location:
    Catfish Co, KY
    Could be. The 40 GAP and the RIMZ moon clips would be a neat idea in a S&W 610 though.
     
  6. pauli

    pauli Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,458
    Location:
    herndon, va, usa
    you're right. .40 gap is no good. we'll have to call it the .40 crisco.
     
  7. Carbon_15

    Carbon_15 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    922
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I was thinking more along the lines of a 9mm GAP. The power of a 9mm in a .380 sized gun.
     
  8. George Hill

    George Hill Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,842
    Location:
    Uintah Basin, UT
    "I was thinking more along the lines of a 9mm GAP. The power of a 9mm in a .380 sized gun."

    You can already get that in your .380 with ammo from Pro-Load.

    Sorry guys. I see where you are going, but it's silly. You want this... get a KAHR MK9 or MK40. Even .380's don't get much smaller than that.

    And if they did - I wouldn't want to shoot it.
     
  9. cratz2

    cratz2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,233
    Location:
    Central IN
    The concept of shorter and more expensive ammo for the 610 which can shoot very hot 10mm, hotter 40S&W, weaker 40S&W and handloaded 40S&W ammo that could be loaded so weak it would have no chance in cycling a semiauto slide. :uhoh:

    I guess I just don't get it.

    And while most folks here haven't embraced the idea of the 45GAP, the very clear idea of it is there are many law enforcement agencies that would like to with with a 45 cal pistol but many people can't manipulate the controls on the Glock 21 without shifting their grip... The 45GAP allows a 45 cal bullet in a gun with the same grip size as the G17/23.

    While I see a 5% use for the 45GAP, I really can't see any possible reason for a 40GAP... Unless you wanted a gun with a smaller grip than a Kahr P40 which just doesn't really make sense as I've never seen a single person EVER say 'I like the Kahr PM9... reliable and a good triger buy oy, the grip is just frickin' huge!'.
     
  10. Moparmike

    Moparmike Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,600
    Location:
    Oddly enough, a downwardly-plunging firey handbask
    I am waiting for us to go the other way around. I want the power of a .458 Lott out of a .25acp. Do they make brass that can handle a small nuclear explosion?:D :rolleyes:
     
  11. arinvolvo

    arinvolvo Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,525
    Location:
    VIVA!!
    Ya, i thought that 9mm and 40 cal were covered by kahr for SMALL carry options?

    Why would you want it any smaller than a kahr MK or PM series?

    I mean it is always nice to have smaller guns, and more options. But a gun that is smaller than the XD sub with the same calibers are already available.
     
  12. BrokenArrow

    BrokenArrow Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    Lost In Space
    I think I know what he means... I know what I think he means. ;)

    A shorter .40 w a much stronger case might let ya get the same velocities w the same length/weight bullets, or close enough. Even if you were limted to shorter bullets, say 165 and lighter, might have plenty of appeal for some? Might also drive a stake through the kB bogeyman's heart in Glocks (and other .40 guns).

    OTOH, like the 45 GAP, while shorter, it wouldn't be any thinner, and the momentum generated would limit how much smaller and lighter the guns slides/bbls could be compared to a 9/40. Might get a shorter front to back mag/grip, and not much else?

    Hey, a 9mm GAP, a .357SIG w a longer neck and thicker case web, might "fix" some of the repeating probs I see w that caliber too? ;)
     
  13. Josey

    Josey member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,476
    Location:
    Catfish Co, KY
    Broken Arrow, you got it!
     
  14. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    Would it be possible to make a 44 Magnum GAP cartridge and then make a Kel Tec P32 chambered for it???
     
  15. PCRCCW

    PCRCCW Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,860
    Location:
    The Ice Cream Capitol of the World!
    I see the curiosity point of it...............But until someone improves the 40 S*W case the higher pressures needed to get any velocity out of it would create an instant KB waiting to happen.

    Shoot well.
     
  16. arinvolvo

    arinvolvo Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,525
    Location:
    VIVA!!
    ya, but are the 40 cal kb issues due to weak casing, or due to improper support for the case?

    I think the latter.

    But i still dont see 40gap in the future.
     
  17. BrokenArrow

    BrokenArrow Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    Lost In Space
    I think it's both, though either contributes more than the other depending on specific incidents. Even HK USPs have kBd, and they have as much case support as ya can get in an auto.

    All the 40s, from everybody, are doing it more than the 9 does or ever did in the same designs, and the 9x19 often operates at much higher pressures, especially in CIP/NATO or other mil spec form, even higher than the 357SIG.

    Seems like the 40 factory ammo gets messed up worse more often, and the guns don't handle it as well when it does?
     
  18. Sean Smith

    Sean Smith Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,922
    Given the apparently much greater propensity for .40 S&W guns to explode than 10mm guns, and the blowing up of .40 S&W USPs with plenty of support for the case, I'd say the former. ;)
     
  19. gunfan

    gunfan Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    678
    Location:
    Western U.S.A
    .40 G.A.P.

    :what: :confused: :barf: :cuss: and ultimately... ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! :neener:

    Scott
     
  20. BrokenArrow

    BrokenArrow Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    Lost In Space
    How about a 8mm GAP!?

    Neck down a .45 to .32...

    Or go the other way, and rebate the case rim of a 45 GAP to .22... then ya could make at least half the slide real easy to hide? ;)
     
  21. PCRCCW

    PCRCCW Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,860
    Location:
    The Ice Cream Capitol of the World!
    "All the 40s, from everybody, are doing it more than the 9 does or ever did in the same designs, and the 9x19 often operates at much higher pressures, especially in CIP/NATO or other mil spec form, even higher than the 357SIG"

    Are you sure???? 40's are already at the top of the SAAMI pressure scale..much like +P 9mm. Most NATO rounds are in the same pressure level and some sub gun ammo may be higher but the 40 is already pretty damn high and its the same as the 357 Sig............

    From what Ive gathered......MOST KB's are from 180gr Bullets suffering from feedramp slamming and bullet setback. Unsupported chambers and weak cases dont help......it all just shows there is no rule.

    Shoot well.
     
  22. BrokenArrow

    BrokenArrow Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    Lost In Space
    You are mistaken on the 40 pressure level:

    SAAMI pressure limit for the 40 S&W is 35,000 psi

    SAAMI limit for 9x19 is 35,000 psi, the SAAMI +P limit for 9x19 is 38,500 psi

    The CIP limit for 9x19 is 270 MPa, about 39,200 psi

    Some NATO, US LEO, and mil-spec 9x19 is loaded to over 42,000 psi

    The 357SIG SAAMI max is 40,000 psi.

    Might have to do w relative case capacity and pressure? Seems like a little setback will send 40 pressures higher/easier than the 9x19; as high as 70,000 psi. Not sure the 9 gets as high as easy; if it does, the cases and guns still seem to be handling it better for whatever reason(s).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page