Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

44 Mag Redhawk vs Blackhawk?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by BigBlock, Sep 19, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BigBlock

    BigBlock member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    952
    Location:
    OR
    As much as I LOVE my 5.5" SS Super Blackhawk, I'm leaning towards trading it in for a new 4" Redhawk. Mostly just for target shooting, and woods carry.

    What do you guys think? Which would you rather have? Unfortunately I can't have both, right now anyway. :rolleyes: I know the obvious differences between the two...but is there anything else I should know? How does the recoil compare?
     
  2. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    21,718
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    I like both revolvers but you might find that 4" Redhawk a little heavy for woods carry. If it's heavy you might not carry it all the time.

    If the weight doesn't bother you I would think a 4" Redhawk would do just as good a job as your Super Blackhawk. The only advantage would be speed of fire rate because it's a DA revolver. If you are very good with your SA fire rate then there is no advantage. I agree with you, I would hate to let the SBH go too...
     
  3. Daizee

    Daizee Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    475
    I recently shot a 7.5" Redhawk. what an impressive firearm.
    But Blackhawks are just *wonderful*.

    -Daizee
     
  4. BigBlock

    BigBlock member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    952
    Location:
    OR
    You guys are killin' me here....every time I get a gun first it's "no I don't need anymore right now", then "I might sell one and get a different", then "no I'll keep what I have and buy a cheap gun", and finally "ok, I'll just buy a good one and keep 'em all". They'll be worth more someday right? :banghead:

    Seriously, guns are worse than a crack habbit!

    Another thing, are the Redhawk and Super Redhawk/Alaskan esentially the same thing except the grip frame and barrel? I've never actually played with a Redhawk yet, just an Alaskan...
     
  5. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    NW Montana
    BigBlock, last weekend I finally picked up a Ruger Redhawk in .45 Colt that I ordered about a month ago. I don't think you'd be disappointed with a Redhawk. The DA trigger is surprisingly good and I like the way the front of the cylinder locks into the frame. The finish is just ok but it's functional and it's obvious that this revolver can take some punishment ... it's built like a tank! Are you considering the KRH-444? The Alaskan is a Super Redhawk without the barrel and SRHs have an extended frame, but other than that, SRHs and RHs are very similar.

    :)
     
  6. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    21,718
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    1858,
    Well thanks a lot!!!
    I'm on a .45 Colt kick and you have to go and mention how good the new .45 Colt Redhawk is... ;)

    Didn't feel bad BigBlock, we all have the same addiction to some extent. I happen to have a particularity sever case but I don't have the deep pockets to keep up with it!! I always say, "So many toys, so little money!"
     
  7. Ben Shepherd

    Ben Shepherd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    4,755
    Location:
    Utah
    ArchAngel, how 'bout this nudge-

    The 45 is lighter than the 44(bigger holes). AND you can meet or beat 44 balistics with a larger diameter slug and less recoil to boot.

    Now what 'ya gonna do?

    Personally, I don't have to pick one or the other, I have both.:neener:
     
  8. critter

    critter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,166
    Location:
    southeast AR
    Had a Redhawk. Sold it and got the SBH Hunter model. Never looked back! Lighter, more accurate-at least for this pair, and I never did/have needed the double action.
     
  9. 461

    461 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    1,133
    Location:
    NE.
    I had a Redhawk, a Super Redhawk, and a Super Blackhawk. I now have only the Super Blackhawk of the three. It's just what works for me and you'd be well served with any of them, I just prefer the SA.

    The Redhawk and the Super Redhawk/Alaskan are totally different designs, lockwork, grip and frame, about as Apples to Oranges a comparison as the Redhawk to Super Blackhawk.
     
  10. george29

    george29 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,311
    Location:
    Land of Entrapment
    I was thinking the exact same thing this week, went to one of the big warehouse places and hit a few of the local shops. The Alaskan that I held feels lighter than my 5.5" SBH and was really nifty ($750) nobody seems to be able to get their jands on a 4" New Redhawk, they are going at premium prices when you find one. Decided I would stick with my SBH
     
  11. mtngunr

    mtngunr Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    458
    Location:
    SEUS
    My hand prefers the SA gripframe for bigbores...period....I've owned several Redhawks.....very durable, very accurate, very heavy, prone to misfires, especially in DA....
     
  12. Majic

    Majic Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2003
    Messages:
    5,370
    Location:
    Virginia
    Why get rid of a gun that you LOVE for anything else? The RH may be just fine but if you find you still love the SBH then what are you going to do?
     
  13. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    21,718
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    Ben Shepherd,
    The reason I said I'm on a .45 Colt kick is because I bought an "old" Bisley Vaquero a few months back. I really like this old revolver and I agree, it can be loaded hot. I don't think I'll push it hard though because I like this revolver so much I don't want to take a chance on messin it up! My reloads are pushing a 255gr LSWC ~1000 fps. If I can't get it done with that load it might not need doing! :p

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  14. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    NW Montana
    I got my NIB Redhawk in .45 Colt for $637 with $20 shipping and no FFL fee!! I bought it from www.rugerpistols.com . They shipped it about a week after I ordered it!!

    KRH-45-4

    Well, I own a NEW Redhawk in .45 Colt and I've handled two NEW Super Redhawks in .45 Colt/.454 Casull and they look/feel very similar to my uncalibrated eyes/mits. Ruger doesn't seem to make any mention of the "significant" design differences that you mention. I would think they'd make a big deal out of the differences since the Super Redhawk is their flagship (most expensive) revolver.


    Ruger Redhawk® double action revolvers in satin stainless finish offer the following design features:

    ** A choice of 4", 5 1/2" or 7 1/2" barrel length.

    ** Rugged frame, designed specifically to handle powerful magnum loads, includes extra metal in top strap, sidewalls and barrel mounting areas.

    ** Patented single-spring mechanism for both hammer and trigger.

    ** KRH-444 features Hogue® rubber grip and is only available with a 4" barrel.

    ** Triple-locking cylinder is positively locked into the frame at the front, rear, and bottom for more positive alignment.

    ** Micro-adjustable rear sight; readily replaceable front sight.


    Ruger Super Redhawk Alaskan® double action revolvers provide the confidence of a six-shot cylinder in a size and weight that is practical enough to conveniently carry afield. Features include:

    ** 2 1/2" frame-integral barrels, available in .454 Casull and .45 Colt, and now .44 magnum.

    ** .454 Casull Super Redhawk Alaskans are the most compact revolvers available in these calibers.

    ** Super Redhawk Alaskan® feature satin finish stainless steel.

    ** Strong extended frame has extra metal in top strap, sidewalls and barrel mounting areas to handle the powerful .44 Magnum and.454 Casull cartridges.

    ** Patented single spring mechanism for both hammer and trigger.

    ** Triple-locking cylinder is positively locked into the frame at the front, rear, and bottom for more positive alignment.

    ** Peg-style grip frame easily accommodates custom grips.

    ** Hogue® Tamer™ Monogrip® helps cushion recoil.



    :)
     
  15. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    NW Montana
    ArchAngelCD, that really is a lovely revolver. Are you sold on the Bisley grip? From what I've read here, it's very comfortable to point and shoot. As for the Redhawk in .45 Colt, I have absolutely no regrets. It's a formidable revolver which is what I wanted since my plan is to shoot 300/350 grain hard cast bullets using H110 powder at about 1200 fps. Should be a lot of fun!! :D This definitely isn't a CC revolver but I think everyone knows that already.

    :)
     
  16. Ben Shepherd

    Ben Shepherd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    4,755
    Location:
    Utah
    ArchAngelCD-

    Looks like you're covered then.:D

    And well, at that.
     
  17. PennsyPlinker

    PennsyPlinker Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    645
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    1858, I am not ArchAngelCD, but I also picked up a used Bisley Vaquero a couple of months ago. I love the grip, and in fact, had been hunting for this specific gun for quite some time. You can get new Bisleys, and you can get new Vaqueros, but you can't get new Bisley Vaqueros! I like the grip because I have huge hands, and it fits me a lot better than a regular Blackhawk grip. Here are a couple of pictures I posted in another thread after I bought the thing. In the first one you can see the BV. In the second is a Ruger Single Six with the regular Blackhawk grip.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    I've been shooting the wienerized cowboy action loads out of the Vaquero, but I am going to load up some hotter ones, working my way up to "Ruger only" loads just to see how I like it. I doubt I will shoot them all the time, but I am sure I will shoot them some of the time. :D
     
  18. goon

    goon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,246
    I like the Bisley grip frame better too. My hands aren't as big as PennsyPlinker's but they're big enough that I can't easily fit a Blackhawk grip frame. It's cramped enough that my middle finger gets bashed into the triggerguard during recoil. After that happens a couple times, accuracy and fun go right out the window.
    No such problem with the Bisley or square triggerguard SBH grip frame.

    But Bigblock states that he loves his 5.5inch SBH.
    My experience is that if you love a gun that much, don't go trading it off to buy something else. Good guns that you like that much are few and far between. I think you should keep the SBH and save your pennies for a Redhawk.
    Have a yardsale or scalp some football tickets but don't sell a gun you like.
     
  19. Slamfire

    Slamfire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,533
    Location:
    Alabama
    My first revolver was a 44 Mag Blackhawk. Bought it the first year they came out in stainless steel. Still have it, wonderful pistol.

    Bought a Redhawk. What a tank. The thing was engineered for those who have absolute no sense or fear in reloading beyond maximum loads.

    But, I have short fingers and find recoil unpleasant. I need rubber between the frame and my hand. The standard hardback of a Redhawk was just too painful for me.

    Unfortunately the rubber grips made for the Redhawk were made for people with mutant mitts. The things were so large front to back that I could not establish a decent trigger position.

    So I got rid of it.

    If you are interested in one of these, handle them first. If you have long fingers, it might be the pistol for you.

    I still have my Blackhawk.
     
  20. BigBlock

    BigBlock member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Messages:
    952
    Location:
    OR
    You guys are no help at all. :neener: Now I need a Blackhawk and a Redhawk and a Super Redhawk .454 just for good measure. I'll be sending you all a bill. ;)

    I just don't know, I need to go to the gun shop and molest one for a while. For some reason the local place I go never has any...
     
  21. Shawnee

    Shawnee member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    3,306
    Location:
    Along "That Dark and Bloody River"
    +1 for keeping your 5.5" SBH

    Like others have said - never sell a gun you really like.

    I've hunted with SBH's with 7.5" barrels for years and really like them but have been thinking seriously of getting a 5.5" model even though it would be an "extra" - like my four or five other "extra" handguns. :D

    Good luck !

    :cool:
     
  22. Master Blaster

    Master Blaster Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,887
    Location:
    Delaware home of tax free shopping
    The Super redhawk has an extened frame, the redhawk does not. The Super redhawk has a two spring set up, mainspring and trigger return spring. Te redhawk has a one spring set up a much heavier mainspring only. This makes the Super redhawk much more tunable.


    My redhawkwent back to Ruger for this problem, but all is in spec!!!!! I like my 629s better, and they never misfire DA. My redhawk has 2 or three clicks per cylinder with the same ammo. It will only shoot federal primers 98%

    I WOULD NEVER CARRY IT AS A DEFENSE GUN.
     
  23. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,961
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    Think? I think if you trade that Blackhawk for a Redhawk, you're loony. :D Single actions are just SOOOO right for outdoor carry, lighter for their power, accurate, no need for DA in the gun at all as all shots will require single action precision. For me, at least, SA guns are faster out of the holster and on target, at least when the target requires a precision shot. Of course, I'm quite practiced drawing single action guns from leather. But, practice is fun. The SA guns is designed to be rapidly cocked on the draw.

    But, some folks just don't like SA guns, prefer DA. Some don't like revolvers, prefer autos. Takes all kinds. Hell, I have DA guns and autos. I just like SAs for field uses in big calibers. I often carry DA .357s, so I'm not adverse to DA guns, just for a big gun, I went with a .45 Colt Blackhawk. I would like to add a .41 to my collection someday. I'm a bit odd, I guess. Don't even own a .44 mag.
     
  24. mec

    mec Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,458
    they are prone to misfire double action. Mine wouldn't crack cci primers but was ok with most factory loads. Hamilton Bowen identifies the problem as a firing pin that is too short and sells an aftermarket one to correct the problem. The frame fitting wood grips torture my hands but the rubber pachmeyers are comfortable with the heaviest loads. Redhawks are easy to shoot accurately double or single action.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  25. MCMXI

    MCMXI Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    NW Montana
    Now this IS worrying. :eek: I have a Colt Python (stainless, 4" barrel) and a S&W 629 ... both DA revolvers. I've never had a single misfire (FTF) in thousands of rounds, mostly reloads. When I started to research buying a .45 Colt DA revolver, I made it clear that I was considering the S&W 625 Mountain Gun and the Ruger Redhawk. The big consensus here was to buy a Ruger because it could handle the forces generated when shooting heavy loads whereas the S&W would fall apart. I think it was Stainz who mentioned that he'd got rid of his Ruger's due to numerous light strikes. Since he didn't have the newest Redhawk offering in .45 Colt, I felt that it was safe to assume that his past experiences would be just that ... in the past.

    Are all of these misfires occurring with older DA Redhawks? Am I to believe that Ruger in it's infinite stupidity didn't address that SIGNIFICANT design flaw in the new Redhawk in .45 Colt (the model that I just bought)? As mentioned above, the Redhawk has a single spring for the hammer and trigger so was part of the reason for this to prevent misfires?

    :confused:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page