Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

44 Magnum v 45 Long Colt

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by el Godfather, Jul 20, 2012.

?

Which is more powerful?

Poll closed Apr 15, 2015.
  1. 44 Magnum

    71 vote(s)
    64.0%
  2. 45 Long Colt

    40 vote(s)
    36.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. el Godfather

    el Godfather Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,686
    Dear THR:
    Between the 44 Magnum and 45 long colt, which do you prefer? Which is more powerful? I think 44 Mag from the internet searchs.

    Anything else you would like to share?
    Thanks
     
  2. StrawHat

    StrawHat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,623
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    With factory loads, the Magnum is the more powerful load. However, applying that power well...

    Years ago, in my youth, I had to have magnums. The bigger the better. Well they didn't make them any bigger than the 44 so I got a 29-2 and started handloading in ernest. Elmer's load was good and I used it a lot. Also laoded some hotter loads but usually went with the Keith load. I used this revovler and load for white tailed deer and pronounced it "Fantastic"! Then I started hunting with a buddy who carried a Model P Colt, chambered for the 45 long Colt and loaded with black powder under a cast lead bullet. Well, anyone who knows anything will tell you that combination won't work in the field and I told him so. We both got deer that first year, his dropped pretty close to where he shot it, mine required trailing. We both made similar hits so I chalked it up to luck that he did not have to track. Next time out similar results. Eventually, I realized that for all the velocity and penetration the Magnum produced, the long Colt was the better anchor. I now hunt with the long Colt cartridge and have sold off all but one of my Magnums. I use the original ballistics, 260 grain bullet at 950 fps, and often use black powder. If the game is not dropped, it is because of me, not the cartridge.

    If you use a S&W, you can step up the loads a bit. And of course if you use a Ruger SBH or RH, you can really step them up, to the point they will allow you to trail game just like a Magnum.

    So, I opt for the 45 long Colt at the original ballistics. A cartridge that is still delivering what it was designed to do.
     
  3. olafhardtB

    olafhardtB Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    356
    You can find 45 Colt ammo and components and ammo but not as easy as 44 magnum.
     
  4. el Godfather

    el Godfather Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,686
    Whats the hottest possible 44 Magnum load (ft-lbs) engery wise that you can hand load for Ruger SRH?
     
  5. bluethunder1962

    bluethunder1962 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    379
    Location:
    SC
    I got both. 44 mag is lot hotter.
     
  6. Snag

    Snag Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2012
    Messages:
    356
    All things considered I like the 45 Colt better.
     
  7. Hammerdown77

    Hammerdown77 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    604
    Location:
    North Alabama
    We JUST had a lengthy discussion on this topic.
     
  8. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,741
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    Yep, there was a very extensive discussion about it recently, I'd suggest finding it.

    If you're talking about standard pressure .45Colt, then the .44 wins hands down.

    If you're talking about .45Colt loads for modern SAA's and Ruger mid-frames at 21-22,000psi, then the .44 wins hands down.

    If you're talking about "Ruger only" .45Colt loads at 32,000psi, then it's a wash.

    If you're talking about custom five-shot .45Colt loads at 50-55,000psi, then the .45 wins hands down.
     
  9. BBQLS1

    BBQLS1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    978
    I voted for the Magnum. For all practical purposes, it'll do more than the .45 Colt. Still I prefer the .45 Colt..... partly because it's a cool old cartdrige, it's bigger, throws more lead, and in the right gun/application offers way plenty power for almost any task if not any. It'll penetrate that's for sure.... and that's what you really care about anyways.

    But heck, if power is what you crave why not .454 Casul.... or .460 S&W Mag.... or .500 S&W Mag.... or .50 BMG!!!!!! ;)
     
  10. powell&hyde

    powell&hyde Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    238
    Location:
    Iowa
  11. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,502
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    Both the .45 Colt and the .44 Magnum can be loaded hotter (in strong guns) than most of us would care to shoot on a routine basis.

    I personally like the .45 Colt -- I have a Ruger Blackhawk and a Colt New Service. I find that loads that are safe in the latter (approximately .45 ACP pressure levels) will shoot through white tail deer lengthwise. What more do you need?
     
  12. ljnowell

    ljnowell Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    6,193
    Location:
    The Peoples Republic of IL
    Not only should that end the thread, it should be posted in every such thread after this to end it.
     
  13. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,741
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    Thank you! :D
     
  14. firesky101

    firesky101 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,433
    Location:
    California
    Where is the option for they will both do anything you want in the lower 48?
     
  15. Prosser

    Prosser Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,451
    If you have to run either one over 30k pressure you need a .475(get a bigger gun).

    They are no longer in the discussion of 'most powerful'.

    If that's what you need, in a compact package, for under a 1k, buy a BFR in .500JRH or .475 Linebaugh.

    That said, they both are similar in cost, and both are adequate, or more then adequate for anything in the 48. Reminds me of the .308 and 30-06 of the handgun world.
     
  16. Texan Scott

    Texan Scott Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,184
    Location:
    The Texas Hill Country
  17. .44 Associate

    .44 Associate Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    51
    As pointed out, CraigC wins the thread.

    I have only one thing to add: "energy" is nearly useless when discussing handguns. There are other, much more important, factors. Chief of those is frontal area. Game animals are much more impressed by it than by "energy". That's a big factor in the effectiveness of the .45, and so a big factor behind the "cult" of the cartridge.
     
  18. Prosser

    Prosser Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,451
    If 325's at 1350 fps won't get it done, out of either caliber, you need a bigger caliber or a rifle.
     
  19. mavracer

    mavracer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,393
    Location:
    wichita
    As to the power question CraigC nailed it, as to my preference I love both equally good thing it's the right to keep and bear arms ;)
     
  20. Nick5182

    Nick5182 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Messages:
    583
    Location:
    Iowa
    I prefer the. 45 colt mainly because it's not as much of a wrist-breaker as the .44 mag. Much nicer on the arms during extended firing sessions. As for power, double tap makes some very hot . 45 colt ranging in the 1300+ fps range (if I remember the correctly, I could be wrong though.) Just make sure your firearm can handle loads that hot. My ruger blackhawk can handle them fine.
     
  21. Cocked & Locked

    Cocked & Locked Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,610
    Location:
    Silver Hill, NC
    Big Bang

    Off the shelf .44 magnum ammo wins every time against .45 Colt.

    If the .45 Colt is handloaded with Ruger only loads for BH and RH revolvers then it becomes a coin toss.

    My preference is the .44 magnum but I enjoy both. :uhoh:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Are you thinking about one or the other...or perhaps both el Godfather? By the way, off topic but I've got your hat. ;) Off topic, but I've got your hat.

    [​IMG]
     
  22. BCRider

    BCRider Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,737
    Location:
    Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
    According to my two manuals that's at the top or well over even .454Casull max pressure.

    I'd suggest that the comparison between .44Mag and .45 Colt was surpased a good 15,000 psi before this.... :D
     
  23. Prosser

    Prosser Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,451
    The 5 shots were loaded to real insanity, and many took it for a long time.

    If you stay with H110, you can pretty much fill the case and load the bullet on top, and the guns can take it. The BFR's are even stronger then the custom rugers.
     
  24. BCRider

    BCRider Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    7,737
    Location:
    Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
    ... or 2400. It provides very close to the same pressure per powder volume but I enjoy the bigger fireballs... :D
     
  25. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,741
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    Load data in that range is typically provided by the gunsmith who builds them. Most factory .454 loads are in that pressure range. Of course, as noted, if you're going five-shot, you're better off with a .475 or .500.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page