Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.44 Special vs .45 ACP

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by BluedRevolver, Apr 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BluedRevolver

    BluedRevolver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    109
    Location:
    Louisiana
  2. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,372
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    Well, I run a 210 gr. SJHP at 985 FPS out of a 2.5" Bulldog pug, and that's not even a max load.

    .44 Spl. runs at lower pressure than .45 ACP (15,500 PSI vs. 21,000 PSI), but has considerably more case capacity (35 grs. vs. 25 grs.). Once you actually put a bullet in, the .44 Spl. has about double the case capacity of a .45 ACP.

    As for one being better than the other in real-world terminal performance? Not really. 6 of one, a half dozen of the other.
     
  3. bluethunder1962

    bluethunder1962 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    379
    Location:
    SC
    I have found 45 acp's are a lot easier to find and cheaper and I have not been able to find 44 spl in bulk. 44 mag's are just to much for my "terder" hand.
     
  4. hogshead

    hogshead Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    987
    Location:
    North Carolina
    I think they are very similar in performance out of a short barreled gun . Just the platform is different the 44 being a revolver and the 45 being an auto usually. I have a 44 Charter and like it for hiking because of being able to fire rat shot.
     
  5. BluedRevolver

    BluedRevolver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    109
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Is it true that "bigger is better"?
     
  6. 19-3Ben

    19-3Ben Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,146
    Location:
    CT
    Why do you assume that the lower diameter means it has a smaller meplat. The meplat is just the flat part at the front of the bullet. Without needing to have a profile conducive to feeding into the chamber from a feed ramp, a .44spl may well have a wider meplat than the .45.
    To go back to your example, using Buffalo Bore, you can have a .44spl full wadcutter where the whole darn diameter is "meplat."
     
  7. jimniowa

    jimniowa Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Messages:
    117
    Location:
    Georgetown, TX
    Short barrel pistols in .44sp or .45acp to me is for carry and SD. My primary carry gun was a .44sp 2" with 5 shots. This is a great gun to slip in your rear pocket (jeans). I would load it with 210g sthp for mild temps and 240g jsp for the cold. The people you want to avoid wear heavy clothing even furs in the winter, the jsp would not eat up the excess material of clothing. I switched to a 3" .45acp because of the extra ammo capacity 7. It is as easy to carry as the snubby and I load 230g fmj bullets for it. We plan on relocating south so the .44sp will be a good trail gun with bird shot. In short barrels I doubt there is any difference in the stopping power with similar loads.
    Jim
     
  8. Owen Sparks

    Owen Sparks member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    4,524
    I have experimented with handloading both with the exact same charge of powder under the exact same weight bullet and the 5" .45 1911 gives significantly higher velocity than a 3" vented Bulldog revolver does.

    In an apples to apples comparison with both fired in revolvers with the same length barrels, (a 1917 S&W .45 ACP and the .44 Special fired in a Ruger Redhawk), preformance with a 200 grain bullets over 6 grains of Unique, was virtually identical.
     
  9. Elmer

    Elmer Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    998
    Exactly.
     
  10. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,736
    Location:
    Central PA
    Lots of good info on that question in this thread: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=638054

    With the two loads you listed, you're really picking the fly poop out of the pepper (so to speak) to tell any performance difference between them.

    There are competing theories that would support either as "THE BEST" and until you do ballistic gel testing (or shoot a herd of goats and measure how long it takes for them to expire) you won't know for sure that ... well ... they're just about the same.

    Based on these two loads, fired from guns of equal barrel length, capacity, and weight, there would be no compelling reason to choose one over the other.
     
  11. Wil Terry

    Wil Terry Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,129
    Location:
    Black Hills, South Dakota, USA
    YOU BET DIAMETER COUNTS, IN SPADES !!!
    The 44SPL is truly a 43 caliber round and the 45ACP is indeed an actual 45 caliber round. And that is a hellofalot more than .002".
     
  12. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,736
    Location:
    Central PA
    Wil, can you expand a bit on your feelings on this? Beside strictly numbers (0.02" or 10% fontal area, or whatever), what exactly is the "hellofalot" difference in terminal effect?

    Better sectional density for the .44 Spc? Better momentum for the .45? How do you feel one is superior -- and how would you characterize the differences in effect on a living body? (Beside allowing you to be 0.01" off your point of aim and still hitting a vital structure?)
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2012
  13. Boxhead

    Boxhead Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    600
    Location:
    Bouncing between Geoje Korea, The Texas Hill Count
    While I will not argue on this I will note that your math is wrong.

    .45 -.43 = .02 not .002
     
  14. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,736
    Location:
    Central PA
    Right. Edited.
     
  15. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,740
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    Precisely! There are a "hellofalot" better things to worry about than the difference between these two.
     
  16. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,372
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    The .0225" diameter difference between a .44 (0.429") and .45 ACP (0.4515") bullet is slightly more than the thickness of a matchbook cover (~0.015"). If you think that really counts for anything in this regard, I urge to to do some research on handgun wounding ballistics. Wounds by common service cartridges (9x19mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, .38 Spl., etc) tend to be indistinguishable from one another in the OR or morgue. Move down (.22, .25) or up (10mm, .41 mag, .44 Mag) significantly and the differences can become apparent. But I promise you, no person hit by or doctor examining the wounds created by a .44 Spl. and a .45 ACP is going to be able to tell which is which.
     
  17. Deaf Smith

    Deaf Smith Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2004
    Messages:
    4,512
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    In a modern .44 Spl. N frame, like my Lew Horton 24 3 incher, the .44 special becomes quite a good round. But in a N frame like my (ok I'm bragging) 625 3 inch .45 ACP, you can use .45 SUPERS!

    Both rounds are mighty good and as others have said, there really isn't all that much difference. I guess it all depends on if you reload (the .44 then becomes more versatile.)

    Deaf
     
  18. weregunner

    weregunner Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,561
    When a person is shot by a big bore cartridge how is that person supposed to tell the difference? Same goes for animals shot with big bores.

    They can tell the difference? I can see this now. " I'm not going to fall over or die from this. It's just a .44 Special!" "Hey, it tickles!" Yeah,right.

    "IT"S A .45!!!!!! GOTTA GO DIE AS OF YESTERDAY!!" Ker-splaaat! Really? Puuulease!!

    I've got both .45 ACP pistols and .44 Special revolvers and feel more than adequately protected by either.
     
  19. buckhorn_cortez

    buckhorn_cortez Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    523
    You can get much higher velocity from the .44 Special. It can be loaded to .44 magnum levels if you're using a modern revolver (N frame), and I don't think anyone is going to argue that a .45 ACP has anywhere near the terminal ballistics of a .44 magnum.

    Remember, the .44 magnum was developed by Elmer Keith using .44 special pistols and brass. The reason the .44 magnum cartridge is longer is so you cannot load a .44 magnum in an older single action .44 Special that is not rated for higher pressures.

    I have loaded .44 Specials for my N frame that are 19 grains of H110 with a 240 grain bullet - and that is exactly the load I also use in my .44 magnum.

    I have .45 ACP, .41 magnum, .44 Special, and .44 magnum - I wouldn't want to get in front of any of them - no matter what the diameter differences may be.
     
  20. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,081
    Location:
    Georgia
    True, but in real world shootings even 44 mags have not proven to be much, if any more effective than the best loads in 44 Special, 45 ACP, 40 S&W or even 9mm. The added speed might make for a more effective hunting round for big game at longer ranges, but does not seem to make much difference in humans at typical SD ranges.
     
  21. mdauben

    mdauben Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,162
    Location:
    Huntville, AL
    Personally, I prefer the idea of the .44spl better in an L Frame gun like the 696. Its plenty of gun for an actually .44spl and much handier for CCW. If you are trying to push .44mag perfomance out of a .44spl case in an N Frame gun, why not just shoot the .44mag? If using factory ammo, .44mag can often be found cheaper than .44spl, anyway. ;)

    As far as the "terminal ballistics" of the .44mag go, on paper they do indeed surpass the .44spl, .45acp or just about any other common SD round. The problem is, IMO, that there is more to being an effective SD round that just terminal numbers. I personally think the .44mag is "too much" for SD (too much recoil, too much time between shots, too much penetration, too much muzzle blast/flash) and I would take a .45acp (or for that matter, a 9mm) over a .44mag for SD every time. :cool:
     
  22. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,740
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    Because oftentimes the .44Spl is plenty, not to mention that 24's are lighter and better looking than 29's and have better sights.

    Besides, a 250gr at 1200fps is not .44Mag performance. It's the upper end of the .44Spl's performance. A 240gr at 1450fps is .44Mag performance. A 355gr at 1200fps is. Why the need to pigeon-hole a cartridge?

    [​IMG]

    Why load the .45Colt heavy when you can just shoot the .44Mag? Why monkey around with the .38-40 when so many other cartridges do the same thing with less effort? Well, because we want to.
     
  23. Elmer

    Elmer Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    998
    Exactly right.
     
  24. mdauben

    mdauben Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,162
    Location:
    Huntville, AL
    Well, I would agree, but I wasn't the one suggesting that the .44spl be pushed to .44mag levels in an SD weapon, I was the one questioning the reasoning of doing so.

    I'm no expert on these two guns, and I have neither the guns or the stats to compare, but are you saying the 6-shot, N Frame S&W 624 weighs less than the 5-shot, L Frame S&W 696? This seems counter-intuative. Also, don't both guns come with the standard S&W red-ramp front, adjustable rear sights? Or am I just totally confused? :confused:
     
  25. Sam1911

    Sam1911 Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    33,736
    Location:
    Central PA
    For some reason I'm reminded of an interview with John Cleese when he was asked to describe his old friend Graham Chapman, in one word.

    Cleese: "Dead."
    Interviewer, laughing: "Ok. Ok. In two words then."
    Cleese: "Very dead."
    Interviewer, laughing harder: "All right then. Describe him in FOUR words."
    Cleese: "Not at all well."

    :)

    Some is good. Some more might be a bit better. A whole lot more? Not any better and quite possibly worse.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page