Jeff White:
If you want a really shinning example of governmenyt baloney at it's finest, consider the following, from Famous But Incompetent, or the Fan Belt Inspectors, whichever you might prefer, thought there are likely other sobriquants that would work as well.
Brady Law stipulated that no records to be kept, except for those of denied purchase applications, and the unique number assigned to approved purchases. Getting "government approval" for the exercise of a constitutional right is sort of interesting, isn't it? Anyhow, our friends at FBI, either wrote, or had written, to their specs. one would assume, the computer programs that run this NICS business.
The following comes from the FBI themselves, the quote isn't exact, but the following hits all the essential notes. The default of the program, EVERY COMPUTER PROGRAM HAS A DEFAULT SETTING is, notwithstanding the requirements of The Brady Law, RETAIN DATA. This is the guts of the program, either written by or for the FBI. FBI has also claimed that in order to remove/change this default, that they would have to shut the entire system down for a period of months, at tremendous cost, thereby shutting off the sale of firearms in the U.S., at least with respect to sales made by FFL's.
Re this example of BLACKMAIL, which is exactly what their tactic amounts to, exactly how long would it take to change a line of code in a computer program? A couple of minutes, I should think, and I have, in the past, instigated and seen accomplished, changes in a computer program. I spoke with the programmer, explaining what I wanted, asking if he could accomplish what was wanted? He thought for a moment, and said that it would take less than ten minutes, which is what it took, less than ten minutes, quite a bit less than ten minutes, as I recall.
So push coming to shove, the standard government tactic still seems to be in use, deny, deny, deny, lie, lie, lie. Interestingly, they don't even lie very well. By the way, your apology is not excepted, given that there was no need for one in the first place. Thanks for the offer though, since I sometimes come across sounding somewhat harsh, or so I have been told.
I for one wonder as to how much a really sharp lawyer would charge, and how much it would ultimately cost to bring a suit such as you suggest. It sounds like something that might prove more thsan a little interesting, particularly if the suit could garner solme serious media coverage, wouldn't that be something to see, media admitting that it too was lying all along, can you picture it??