earplug
Member
The 5 inch version of the 625 used to rule in USPSA competition. I still have two. Started with the JM 4 inch. The longer sight radius of the 5 inch is helpful. Shooting bulleye with the four inch with a red dot worked well.
What grips are those?
On my short list to getI have a Charter Arms pit bull in 45 ACP and it is an excellent revolver. Not real fancy but it sure does everything you expect of it . Just today I loaded up 100 full wadcutters from Matts bullets for home defense rnds. The Charter handles anything you want to feed it . And no moon clips
I have no revolvers in .45 ACP currently. That may change soon. As a big fan of Jerry Miculek (love to see guys my age smoking the youngsters out there on the competition circuit), I have been lusting after a S&W 625 JM myself -- until the other day when I found a 625 Performance Center Model. Didn't care much for the colorful stocks, but the angled underlug (I just don't like the full underlugs on a lot of S&W revolvers, including the JM model), the weight, balance and feel of the thing just made me think this might be my next revolver ... the cylinder's chamfered for moon clips and the lock-up was great. I think some Kim Ahrends finger-groove stocks would look nice on this. It's just a pretty gun too. The MSRP is about $1080, but it appears to be going for just a bit over 900 in my area. I just like the idea of having a revolver that takes one of my two favorite handgun calibers.
I am NOT one who believes that the S&W quality "ain't what it used to be." In fact, I think they're making better guns now than they did back in the '90 and early '00s (especially during the Bangor Punta era). Every new Smith I've bought or handled in the past couple years has been perfect. (Well, except for the damn lock)
Those grips really do it for those guns. Certain combos can make an ordinary revolver (or auto) look exceptional!
Well, 36 posts before someone brought up MIM parts, I guess that's a record. Since I've never personally had a MIM part break (on countless late model pistols and revolvers) nor have I ever known personally anyone (in spite of my fairly extensive shooting experience and relatively large circle of shooting buddies and acquaintances) who's had a MIM part break ... all I can say to that is ... whatever.
Having started in my law enforcement career with a S&W revolver, with my shooting experiences beginning back in the '60s with S&W revolvers, having used S&W revolvers until now, including many with the dreaded MIM parts, I can also relate that I've seen the cycles of S&W quality at its peak, ebb and wane, and eventually return to pretty doggone well made handguns. Ask THR member Mr. Borland, who knows a thing or two about S&W revolvers ... or Jerry Miculek, for that matter, what they think.
Frankly, I care not for opinions of those who chime in with casual remarks about the "cheaper, more fragile MIM parts" yet can't devote a couple extra minutes of typing to document their firsthand knowledge of such.
How many MIM parts have you personally seen break or otherwise fail, last poster?