Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

45ACP: 185 vs 200 vs 230 gr.

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by owenbright, Jan 2, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. owenbright

    owenbright Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    116
    Location:
    AK
    For light, low recoil loads, what do you prefer?

    I'm going to experiment w/ 230gr RN w/ 3.9gr WST and
    200gr LSWC w/ 4.2gr WST.
     
  2. HSMITH

    HSMITH Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,933
    I like the 200 for punching paper. Accuracy is everything a 230 will give, feeding is a little more forgiving than a 185, recoil is enough to operate a stadard sprung gun. There isn't much to dislike about 200's.

    WST is a good powder as long as you don't need to make a certain power level. It is very temperature sensitive. Other than that it shoots great.
     
  3. Sunray

    Sunray Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,786
    Location:
    London, Ont.
    A cast 239 grain RN or FP with 4.5 grains of Bullseye is an excellent target load. 200's are ok, but the 185's can give you feeding problems due to the short OAL. Remember that .45's require a taper crimp only. Aids feeding.
     
  4. Mark whiz

    Mark whiz Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Messages:
    789
    Location:
    Wabash, IN
    I too vote for a 200gr bullet - as those work best in my 1911-A1 Mil-Spec.
    The 1911 was originally designed for 200gr bullets, and it shows in my case anyway.

    I have been using 200gr Ranier plated SWCs with 4.7gr of WST or 9.6gr of AA#5. The WST is a real light shooter, it feeds well for me but much less of a charge tends to promote ejection and feeding issues. The AA#5 charge is VERY accurate for me, but runs about 350fps faster than the WST charge.
     
  5. treebeard

    treebeard Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    775
    Location:
    LFOD in NH
    I would have to say the 200gr. JSWC or LSWC is what my 1911's like the most. I do find shooting the 230gr. LRN nice too.
     
  6. halvey

    halvey Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    1,914
    I've shot 1000's of 185's over various charges of Bullseye and never had a problem with feeding in 20+ 1911's.
     
  7. The Bushmaster

    The Bushmaster Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,849
    Location:
    Ava, Missouri
    Me too Halvey. That's all I shoot in my Colt .45ACP is 185 grain JHPs and have never had a failure to feed. My favorite load is 5.7 grains of W-231 with an OAL of 1.200 to 1.250. For a little less felt recoil drop it to 5.0 grains of W-231.
     
  8. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    46,719
    Location:
    Alabama
    I've been shooting Berry's 185 Gr. SWC at 1.190 with no problems. Not sure I like it better than the 200 though. Just trying it out. First time in 20+ yrs. I've shot 185 Gr. in the .45. It's been all 200 to 250. I like the 230 at moderate velocity for plinking. Shot 230 Gr. lead for years.
     
  9. cherryriver

    cherryriver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2006
    Messages:
    335
    Location:
    Northeastern Illinois
    Just a couple of weeks ago, looking for a superlight load for my wife to use in a .45 1911, I tried my two basic target loads:
    230gr RNTMJ Rainier, 3.5gr WST, 600fps;
    185gr RNHB Berry's, 4.5gr WST, 700fps.
    Both required a light recoil spring in the ten-pound range.
    I could not tell any meaningful difference in felt recoil. If either one was softer, it was the 230gr one. Both run very close to 100% for me. Both run okay, about 90-93%, in regular guns with regular springs. Looser guns with more tired springs of course do better.
    The Berry's load ran slightly more reliably for my wife, whose grip is terrible (and she won't put forth the effort to improve it).
    The USPSA boys say heavy bullet/fast powder kicks the least on non-ported guns. After this and several other tries, I now agree.
    WST is my choice as it is both the quietest, least blasty powder, and also seems to be softer in recoil as well.
    Bill
     
  10. srsmith

    srsmith Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    74
    The Berry 185 grain Hollow Base Round Nose plated bullets can be assembled into rounds with the same OAL and similar profile as standard military style ammo.
    This solved feeding issues for me using a light and inexpensive bullet.

    For plinking, I use 5.1 grains of TiteGroup which yields about 800 fps in a 5" 1911.
    You can go quite a bit slower if you want to run with a weaker spring.
    I have gone as low as 4.5 gr of TG for just over 700 fps.

    For a hotter load with the 185 HBRN, I use 5.8 gr of TG for about 900 fps.
    This just makes major power factor and is slow enough to be OK with plated bullets.
    BE SURE YOU DO NOT MIX YOUR BULLETS AND LOAD A 230 GR.
    This would be a BIG MISTAKE !

    Of course, you chould cross check all loading suggestions and follow the directions of the component manufacturers when you develop your loads.

    Have fun !

    -Steve
     
  11. rchernandez

    rchernandez Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    If you want real low felt recoil, try an even lighter bullet. A gunsmith suggested a Valiant 160gr LSWC loaded on 4.4(+)gr bullseye powder. Has been great when tested it at 25yards so far. I'm planning to test it next up to 4.8gr to find a good load for 50yards.

    BTW, these are intended for Bullseye shooting...ie paper punching!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page