Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.45acp vs .50 GI

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Joshua M. Smith, Jan 8, 2007.

?

The .45acp is now obsolete. Will you upgrade?

Poll closed Jan 8, 2008.
  1. Yes! Give me the latest wiz-bang .50!

    16 vote(s)
    17.8%
  2. No! I'll stay with the old obsolete .45acp, thanks.

    74 vote(s)
    82.2%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Joshua M. Smith

    Joshua M. Smith Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,044
    Location:
    Wabash IN
    Hi All,

    This cartridge is still around and has claimed a following since I stumbled onto it a couple years ago so I'd like to revisit it. :D

    I keep hearing that people carry the .45acp "because they don't make a .50" or things along those lines. This is primarily from the "bigger is better" crowd.

    So how about this for a "caliber war"? These are more like caliber discussions here, and therefore I feel comfortable posting them.

    The ballistics from your average .45acp is 230gr @ 830 - 900fps. Not bad. How about this bad boy?

    [​IMG]

    According to their website, their premier performer is the 50GI, which is a 300gr JHP sizzling along at 860fps out of a full-sized 1911 package.

    Soooo... to those who made the claim that they don't make anything bigger than the .45acp, now that they do, will you live up to your claim, or stay with the pop gun you currently have on your hip? :neener:

    This goes double for reloaders, and should the cartridge become more widespread... simply no excuse not to carry it. ;)

    Sooo.... if it becomes widespread (read less expensive platforms and cheaper defense ammunition), will you leave the .45acp for something with more powerful in the form of the .50GI?

    Josh <><

    P.S. I think these guys are listening to the 'net. Back when I originally stumbled onto this handgun/cartridge combo they only offered a loading in the 700fps range. Most agreed that was too slow, and it seems they've upped the power, though from the reviews I've read, recoil ranges from a gentle push in the target loads to about .45acp +P in the heavier defense loadings. J.S.
     
  2. Joshua M. Smith

    Joshua M. Smith Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,044
    Location:
    Wabash IN
    (For those who didn't pick up on it, this poll is a bit tongue-in-cheek. A .22LR vs .25acp poll follows)

    Josh <><
     
  3. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    Thank You Very Much~!

    I will stick with the old, obsolete .45 ACP~!;) :cool: :D
     
  4. Skywarp

    Skywarp member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    305
    Location:
    Nor*Cal 707
    It's funny, because the typical 45 ACP arguments point to the 50GI being the better round.


    I want to build one eventually.
     
  5. bakert

    bakert Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,668
    Think I'll stick with the .45. The .50 will be liked by some and although I may be wrong but I doubt seriously that it will make that much of a impact on most shooters.
     
  6. HiroProX

    HiroProX Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    546
    I seriously doubt that .50GI will gain much of a following. The pistols that chamber it are hideously expensive and only available from one maker.
     
  7. KINGMAX

    KINGMAX Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,166
    Location:
    Central North Carolina
    QUOTE me on this

    NEW & IMPROVED does not equal better. Think about it. I am a FORTY-FIVE man from long ago. I go w/ what I know.



    GLOCK 21 .45 acp
     
  8. Dobe

    Dobe member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,583
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    The typical argument is bigger is better as long as its controlable under quick fire conditions. The size of the .45 ACP in a 1911 is a great package. It is a round that is easy to control, as long as the handgun isn't too light.

    I doubt the 50 GI is a terrible recoiler, but it will be a littler harder to handle than the .45 ACP.

    I'll stick with the .45 ACP as long as I can keep putting it through the 1911.

    Dobe
     
  9. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,070
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    Rather have a 10mm, myself. But, the .45 works. I mean, if it ain't broke.......
     
  10. Greg8098

    Greg8098 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    300
    Location:
    Bossier City, Louisiana
    If they up the speed, to say about 1300 - 1400 f.p.s, then yes I would trade my .45 off for one. But until then, I'll stick with the old and obsolete.
     
  11. High Planes Drifter

    High Planes Drifter Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    I actually like the round. I read about it in Gun Tests. They did a review on it. Problem is, as with many fledgling chamberings, lack of support from a major ammuniton manufacturer. If GI (is it Guncrafter Industies) could market the round to be at least as popular as the .357 Sig, Id strongly consider buying one. There'd be more stability and promise. My point is, you cant expect the average joe to drop over 2 large on a pistol, when only one manufacturer is making ammo for it. IMO great idea. Lets see how far it goes.
     
  12. Plink

    Plink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,302
    I'd own one in a heartbeat if it became mainstream. Right now only one company that I know of makes the guns and they're very high priced. It will never become anything more than an oddity unless the other companies pick it up too. I have had the pleasure to shoot one last summer and I was highly impressed. While I wouldn't want this particular cartridge in a lightweight carry gun, in a full sized frame, it's a joy to shoot.
     
  13. ugaarguy

    ugaarguy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    12,013
    If the 50 GI went mainstream enough that guns (or conversion parts), brass, bullets, and loaded ammo for when I don't want to reload became affordable I'd look at it. On the other hand, do I really want to reload another caliber even if it is affordable?
     
  14. kir_kenix

    kir_kenix Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    356
    Location:
    Shelby, nebraska
    if it were completely main-stream, relatively inexpensive (both in ammo and platform), and i had a chance to thuroughly test/abuse then i might consider it. i dont see those things happening anytime soon...and besides, what is wrong w/ the good ole .45?
     
  15. benelli12

    benelli12 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    258
    Location:
    Kansas City, Missouri
    I will go with the 45, not because it's a better stopper or a better cartrige, its because you dont need a 50 caliber handgun for personal defense. And the weight of a couple clips of 300 grain bullets on your belt would be quite heavy. The 45 is a proven stopper on men, and the 50GI is not necessary for targets that arent 300 pound aliens.:scrutiny:
     
  16. Geronimo45

    Geronimo45 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,345
    Location:
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Obsolete is cheaper than hi-tech - so I'll go with obsolete.
     
  17. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    +1 on .45 being cheaper, i will take the obsolete .45 over the .50
     
  18. Eightball

    Eightball Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    I'll keep .45, you guys move on to the less-obsolete round. And then, when ALL .50's get banned, I'll be able to shoot with glee while you are going to reloaders for all of your ammo.

    Have a nice day :neener:
     
  19. yam476

    yam476 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    27
    Location:
    TX DFW area
    50GI

    I recently got one of their Model 2 pistol (after almost 6 months of waiting for it). I shot a few humdred rounds through it. I actually saw no real use for it as yet, but It shoots real well for me. And I love it.
     
  20. Sry0fcr

    Sry0fcr Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    240
    Location:
    Houston, Republic of Texas
    I'd rather have .45ACP/.45 Super or 10mm than .50.
     
  21. Vitamin G

    Vitamin G Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2003
    Messages:
    934
    Location:
    Monroeville, PA (Home of the Zombies)
    Misread...

    All things being equal, yes, I would make the switch if:

    1) A .50GI was the same cost as a .45acp
    2) .50GI bullets were just as cheap
    3) 50GI brass was just as plentiful on the ground, in the bin, and on ebay, as .45acp.
    4) Everything else I missed, was equal in cost.


    If they have .45acp and .45super...

    Now they have .50GI...


    I'll wait for .50super :evil: (That is NOT a desert eagle)
     
  22. MrDig

    MrDig Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,662
    Location:
    Where all the women are strong, the men are good l
    Are you freaking kidding me? :scrutiny: 2,xxx.xx plus for a side arm? :eek: I'll take the good ole mil spec .45acp and it's abundant and inexpensive ammo please.
     
  23. mstirton

    mstirton Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    218
    Location:
    Manchaca, TX
    I like 45ACP, but I'm sitting on the other fence and would sooner move to 10mm. What does that hold in a single-stack? 6 instead of 8? My 6 shooter is a 44mag and it launches 300gr at well over 860fps.
     
  24. Joshua M. Smith

    Joshua M. Smith Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,044
    Location:
    Wabash IN
    http://www.guncrafterindustries.com/50gi_cartridge.shtml <------ the round

    (Bold added by me)

    http://www.guncrafterindustries.com/model1_50gi.shtml <------ the gun

    Josh <><
     
  25. .357 magnum

    .357 magnum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Love the .45 acp but......

    If a major gun MFG could make .50's that have a reasonable weight, accuracy, recoil and ammunition prices--- well that would be attractive. Now have you ever been around a .50 when it is fired? I have, and the noise level is unreal. I can only imagine what it would sound like if you had to use it in your home for defense. The only plus there, is if you hit the BG one shot would do it. A .50 caliber would knock the crap out of a 400 pound gorilla. I would also be a little worried about over penetration which if you are using hollow points is a myth for the normal calibers. But a .50--who knows where that sucker may end up???

    The Best to All!

    Frank
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page