Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

500 S&W

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by longhorngunman, Oct 6, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. longhorngunman

    longhorngunman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Messages:
    852
    I have an opportunity to buy a BFR in 500S&W for a little over $500. Is this one of those can't miss out on opportunities or should I spend the money on a M1 Garand? :D
     
  2. Oktagon

    Oktagon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    60
    Buy a Garand.
    500S&W is one of the stupidest ideas ever to be implemented by a major gun manufactrer. The gun is barely shootable (esp the 4" version), the ammo is very expensive, and unless you spend allot of time hiking in African savana infested with rabid elephants, this gun has no purpouse. I love my S&W 29s and older 629s (no keyhole), I also love my FA 454 Casul. 500S&W is just too much. Now, it would make a nice carbine round, being shorter then 45/70 based cartridges (more fits in the tubular magazine), but this is propostorous to have in a handgun, unless you suffer form well known Freudian complex :)
     
  3. Freeze N

    Freeze N Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    Tooele, UT
    Buy it.

    Shoot it and if you don't like or want it, Sell it and make some money. I like hand cannons, but some people don't. There is someone out there that would love to have it for more money than that.
     
  4. tc300mag1

    tc300mag1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,913
    Location:
    Wayne, Mi
    Buy the 500
    Unlike the Above poster i find the 4 inch easy to shoot recoils less than my SRH 454 casull It is expensive to shoot factorys loads though and that is why my Dies and bullets etc turned up today

    I shoot the 454 and 500 side by sid for 20 rounds and the Casull was worse for recoil and everyone who shot them said same thing
     
  5. Oktagon

    Oktagon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    60
    I don't see ho Casulls are worse in recoil. I use factory loads only, since I hate to reload and don't have time for it anyway. My time is significantly more expensive then the difference between factory loads and reloads. Corbon Csulls are much more confortable to shoot then 500Smith.
    500 Smish is a solution for nonexistant problem.
     
  6. 280PLUS

    280PLUS Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2003
    Messages:
    3,349
    Location:
    gunnecticut
    Maybe, but I still like shooting them and I don't have any of these Freudian problems you speak of...

    :evil:
     
  7. tc300mag1

    tc300mag1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,913
    Location:
    Wayne, Mi
    Trust me Recoil is Worse on the 454 i didnt think it would be but it is
     
  8. EddieCoyle

    EddieCoyle Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,231
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    What does Freud say about your 454 Casull?

    I think that the 4" S&W 500 is a really dumb gun; a solution in search of a problem that doesn't exist.

    I also bought one last weekend and paid a heck of a lot more than $500 for it. If you can get one for $500, and don't want it, PM me because I'd like a chance at it.
     
  9. Stainz

    Stainz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,117
    Location:
    Pinson, AL
    I want the 3" .500 - loaded with 440-500gr lead or jacketed SP @ 750-800 fps... my 696 needs a big brother. I had a .454 SRH for years... those Hornady 240gr XTP .454 zingers will get folks attention - but they take their toll on your wrist. My .500 idea, only possible with my reloads, should be much milder... once I get past the main hurdle... the $860-$900+ folks want for the S&W .500 Magnum. Then, the dies... lead... cases... another powder...

    I think I'll rejoin reality - and go reload some more .44 Russian wimpy-loads... 3.5gr Titegroup pushes a 240gr LSWC/LRNFP over 690fps from my 3" 696... makes 'major' power factor... is mild... my wrist likes them... Ah, the 3" .500 pipe dream!

    Stainz
     
  10. 280PLUS

    280PLUS Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2003
    Messages:
    3,349
    Location:
    gunnecticut
    Whatever happened to John Ross who claimed to be pushing a 625 gr round at 1000 fps out of a .500? I'll bet that thing went kaboom!

    More like Ka- SMACK!! :eek:
     
  11. tc300mag1

    tc300mag1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,913
    Location:
    Wayne, Mi
    John's up to a 700 grainer now for get what fps is though
     
  12. RonJon

    RonJon Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    182
    Location:
    S. MN
    The purpose of the S&W 500 is to separate the girly-boys from the REAL MEN! :cool:
     
  13. Delmar

    Delmar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,059
    Location:
    Cedar Bluff, VA
    Fun thread-if an anti gunner came in here and said "you don't NEED a 500", the first words out of somebody's mouth would be "get a rope".
    It's never about "need" - its all about fun and buying what you wish.
     
  14. Nimitz

    Nimitz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    220
    Location:
    Cooper City, FL
    i like the .460...you can shoot .454 casull as well.

    Chad
     
  15. klover

    klover Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Messages:
    672
    Location:
    WA
    I wanted to dump a 629, and the only

    trade that seemed ok was to move up to a 500, 8 3/8 barell.
    I fired it, and it was love! I'll never part with it, as it is a hoot to shoot.
    (The other three 629's aint goin nowheres neither :) )
     
  16. Marcus

    Marcus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    SE Pa.
    Before I bought a .500 BFR I`d wanna shoot it. I have no problem at all with long or short barreled S&W .500s. They never fail to bring a big smile to my face. However the single action frame just doesn`t get along with my hands. My custom Super Blackhawk 5 1/2" .44 Mag. used to beat the snot out of me and leave my hands stinging even with factory 240gr. loads. Much *less* recoil than a S&W.500 but much *more* discomfort. I don`t even wanna try a .500 with the same grip frame. Personally I`m planning on getting a S&W .460 XVR. Marcus
     
  17. gbran

    gbran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,975
    Location:
    california
    I have the SRH .454. I have shot the 500 and have found the Casull to have more bite, but not as much push. My problem with either the BFR or the S&W 500 is the sheer size of the gun. It's just too big to be packable. But this is just my opinion.
     
  18. Maxinquaye

    Maxinquaye Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    347
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    I have the .454 and the .500. Reload for them both...max 240 grain hornady's for the .454 and 335 grain loaded less then max for the .500. IMHO the .500 has an order of magnitude more recoil then the .454. Both put a big grin on my face and anyone else who wants to shoot them when I happen to bring 'em to the range :)
     
  19. MDG1976

    MDG1976 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    522
    Location:
    USA
    There are 3 reason to own a 500:

    1. You need it to shoot bears
    2. You're a masochist
    3. You're into novelty guns and have money to burn

    $500 is a great deal. I'd buy it. :D
     
  20. Justang

    Justang Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Messages:
    387
    Location:
    So Cal
  21. Stratford Holdings

    Stratford Holdings Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    65
    Location:
    South Jordan, UT
    I just bought one, used, from Correia. He hooked me up on a killer deal. I'm just waiting for the right time to go and shoot it. I brought the round into work along with a .357 Mag and every ones jaw just drops. I also have the round sitting next to a 12gauge shotgun shell and it's just awe-inspiring.
     
  22. tc300mag1

    tc300mag1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,913
    Location:
    Wayne, Mi
  23. Zundfolge

    Zundfolge Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    10,755
    Location:
    Colorado Springs
    :scrutiny:

    Having shot both side by side, I've found the .500 to be a pussycat compared to the .454. Other then rifle calibered Thompsons Contenders I can't think of a single handgun that was more brutal to shoot then the .454.

    :scrutiny:



    At any rate, the .500mag is not a practical gun. Of course thats not the point is it? :p
     
  24. mnrivrat

    mnrivrat Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,655
    Location:
    MN
    Fun gun to shoot but a bit expensive for the ammo.

    $500 --- very good buy and I can't see where you would ever loose money on that deal. Buy it , shoot it , sell it if you don't fall in love.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page