Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

6x45mm vs 300 BLK?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by CmdrSlander, Mar 21, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CmdrSlander

    CmdrSlander Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,203
    Location:
    Disputed Western Missouri
    Which is better for precision shooting at moderate ranges?

    6x45mm (aka 6mm/.223 - a wildcat cartridge made by necking .233 brass up to accommodate .243 cal bullets) or 300 Blackout?

    ETA: The platform will be bolt action.
     
  2. ExAgoradzo

    ExAgoradzo Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,093
    Location:
    Central Coast of Liberal California
    Cool factor goes to the 6x45.
    Greg
     
  3. Inebriated

    Inebriated Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,680
    Location:
    NC
    I would step up from 6x45 to .243 WSSM.
     
  4. CmdrSlander

    CmdrSlander Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,203
    Location:
    Disputed Western Missouri
    Then I couldn't use my vast stockpile of .223 brass and accouterments :)
     
  5. tahunua001

    tahunua001 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,224
    Location:
    Idaho
    6x45 would get the nod. 300 blk is popular as a suppressed load because it's a heavy bullet going very slow... not suitable as a target load at all.

    I seriously considered an AR in 6x45 but just couldn't find anyone that made the barrels... if you can get ahold of one then I wouldn't hesitate.
     
  6. CmdrSlander

    CmdrSlander Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,203
    Location:
    Disputed Western Missouri
    Not necessarily. It can be loaded with lighter bullets traveling at respectable velocities and shot for accuracy.
     
  7. Inebriated

    Inebriated Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,680
    Location:
    NC
    Ahhh. I gotcha.

    In that case, .300 for suppressed shooting, 6x45 for non-suppressed shooting.
     
  8. tahunua001

    tahunua001 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,224
    Location:
    Idaho
    even so, 300blk drops like a rock, 100 grain 6x45 would shoot a lot flatter than a 125gr 308 and the smaller profile will keep velocity a lot longer and react to outside influences less.
     
  9. CmdrSlander

    CmdrSlander Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,203
    Location:
    Disputed Western Missouri
    Indeed...
     
  10. C-grunt

    C-grunt Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,748
    Location:
    Phoenix Az
    I really like the 300 BLk. I think it really makes the PDW concept a viable weapons system. However I would not use it as a moderate range precision round. It's just not made for that. I'm not up to par on the ballistics of the 6x45 but have you just considered going with a heavy 223? Once you get up to 75+ grains with a good long range bullet the 223 is pretty respectable as a target round to at least 800 yards.
     
  11. eastbank

    eastbank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    2,561
    this 6x47(222rem mag case) shoots bug holes at 100yds and 1/2-3/4 " groups at 200yds and better than 2 inch groups at 300yds. i like it better than the 6x45 because of the longer neck,but thats just me. eastbank.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. CountryUgly

    CountryUgly Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    The Dirty South
    6x45 for your described purposes. I like the .300blk and think it does very well in the areas it was designed for but a target round it is not. The 6 to 6.5mm rounds just shine at the bench and when chasing bean field deer.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page