Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

92 or PX4?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by wild cat mccane, Mar 23, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. wild cat mccane

    wild cat mccane Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    968
    Anyone with experience with both, or more helpful, owns both?
    What is your selection?

    I know the 92 (even PT 92) has a exponentially larger ownership, so anyone with both would greatly help. Thanks!
     
  2. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,617
    Location:
    Texas
    I have seven Beretta 92s (different variants). I have owned a PX4 in 40 cal before. It is the only 40 cal gun I have ever owned because it handles the recoils o well (I have shot other 40s).

    I sold it (the PX4) to have some extra money to go towards a custom 1911 back in 2008, but the gun was a nice gun. No issues with it.

    However, I have discovered that the 92FS, with the regular frame, is my fav handgun of all time. It balances so well 1 handed, with the Hogue rubber grip panels (not the wrap arounds, just the panels). I even sold an Ed Brown 1911 this past weekend to have some money to pick up a couple more guns - one of which will likely be another Beretta.

    Seems strange, but compared to even more expensive guns, the 92FS just "does it" for me...

    I currently only have 1 polymer handgun. At one time, ALL of my handguns were polymer. BuT I have discovered that I prefer rubber grips on all my guns. And, I don't particularly care for the slip on grips that one can put on a polymer handgun. So, I have gotten away from polymer...

    Be aware that the PX4 is a great gun. To me, in 9mm, the rotating barrel doesn't seem to trim as much of the recoil as it does to the 40 cal round. If you want a polymer gun - it's a very good one.

    But both are great guns, and you just need to hold them both and see which one feels better to you.

    If I ever get another fullsize polymer handgun, it would likely be a 9mm PX4. But for now, I'm sticking with my seven 92s, with the 8th one probably coming soon...
     
  3. wild cat mccane

    wild cat mccane Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    968
    Hey Ship! You convinced me to pick up a P99 a while ago. Loved it, but it was flippy. Never have I picked up a gun and shot dead center at 25 yards like I did that P99.

    I am now thinking of the 92.

    92 or P99 again? The P99 thinking has me considering the PX4.
     
  4. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,617
    Location:
    Texas
    Well, I no longer actually have any P(9s. The gun was super accurate, but had more recoil than any other 9mm I have shot. After I got back into Berettas in 2008, I didn't shoot the P99 much. Last year, I shot a P99 to zero in new night sights, and then shot a RUger P95 I had picked up as a beater gun.

    The Ruger had a LOT less recoil than the P99. Since I had the Beretta bug already, I sold the P99 and picked up a second M9A1.

    I have shot the PX4 in 9mm head to head with the P99 a few years ago (shot someone else's 9mm PX4). The PX4 does have less felt recoil, but I think the 92FS has even less, being a metal gun.

    With the hogue grip panels (not the complete wrap around kind), the gun feels great. I think you will like the 92 and the lower recoil it has. Only my 50oz steel 9mm 1911 has less recoil.

    Here is my collection...

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    I've shot both, and both are good.

    The 92 is an increasingly dated design, and a pretty good design but not a classic like the 1911 or Glock. It's very large for a 9mm. Recoil is soft, the trigger is pretty good, and overall ergonomics are pretty good. To me the biggest plus is that because of its age and US military use, there are a lot of spare parts, accessories, and most of all holsters to choose from.

    The PX4 is a more modern design and very cool. It is also exceptionally blocky and bulky, again huge for a 9mm. It also has soft recoil, which is also a bit smoother than Browning-style designs, although there is a slight torque I feel when shooting it. As a range-only pistol it's great. Not sure about holster options. I think it would be too big for any reasonable CCW, and would actually choose a 92 sooner for that use (though neither would be in my top 50 for CCW pistols).

    As for which one to buy, I don't know what you want to do with it.
     
  6. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,617
    Location:
    Texas
    Well, peopel conceal 5" 1911s all the time. I carry my 92FS concealed everyday, at the 3 o'clock position IWB. Been doing it for around 16 months now. Not an issue. I actually like it. Strange as it may seem, I forget it is there. I am not a big guy either - 180lbs, 6'1".

    I have carried shorter guns before IWB - The polymer holster actually stuck into my butt muscle and was uncomfortable after an hour of sitting in the car. The longer holster is MORE comfortable to me.

    The 92 isn't a typical concealed carry gun - but if you carry a 5" 1911 - its really no different size wise. Granted, I can ONLY do it at the 3 o'clock position. But I carry it all summer even with a t shirt.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    The PX4 isn't especially long. What is is bulky - wide, tall, generally big. Yes, I too can conceal a 5" 1911 without too much trouble. The 1911 is narrow and not especially tall, and barrel length isn't a problem within reason (I wouldn't try CCW with a 9.5" revolver). This is the same reason the hammer-fired aluminum Rugers (P85-94) are such a problem to conceal. (I should know, I bought a P94 mistakenly thinking it would be my EDC).
     
  8. ForumSurfer

    ForumSurfer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,057
    Location:
    NC
    I've sold many guns that I've owned. The 96 with crimson trace grips is the only one that I want back fwiw.

    I've never owned a px4, so I can't vote on that. I've never shot one. I do love the way they feel in hand when I checked them out at the store. I wouldn't mind owning a px4c (not the sc, but the c).

    I know a guy with a police trade in ninety-two for sale. It comes with a boat load of mags so I'm thinking about getting it. I guess if I loved the 96, a ninety-two should make me just as happy since it appears to be an improved/enhanced 92.
     
  9. Smaug

    Smaug Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Messages:
    852
    Location:
    North suburban Chicagoland
    No normal person would enjoy concealed carrying a Beretta 92 IWB. (nor would he own 7 or 8 of the same gun)

    I would say a 1911 is a better CC weapon, since it has the narrower slide.
     
  10. NG VI

    NG VI Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,884
    Location:
    Maine
    Hey Shipwreck what's the difference between all the various 92 models anyway?

    Do you carry with the original 15 round mags or do you use the 17 rounders Mec-Gar makes? I think Beretta has factory 17s now too because of the 90-Two.

    How do you like the compact models? They look like my kind of compact, shorter grip with a less shortened slide.
     
  11. ForumSurfer

    ForumSurfer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,057
    Location:
    NC
    They aren't the same gun. They're different variations of the same platform. I can relate to that.
     
  12. OregonJohnny

    OregonJohnny Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,067
    Location:
    Oregon
    Mec-Gar actually makes 18-round magazines for the 92 series that fit flush, and they make a 20-rounder that extends about 3/4" below the grip. I own the 18-rounder, and it functions flawlessly. I actually just ordered 1 of the 20-rounders today, and will thoroughly test it, then it will stay in the gun 24/7, since my 92FS is the primary home defense gun.


    That seems a bit harsh. Why insult a person for their carry or collection choices? Unless this was sarcasm.

    I know a few people who regularly carry full-size, metal-framed, double-stack guns IWB. And as far as owning more than 1 of the same series of firearm, I know a few people who do that, as well.
     
  13. NG VI

    NG VI Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,884
    Location:
    Maine
    Oregon I know they make an 18 as well, but the 18 has a different, somewhat thicker base plate while the 17's base plate is the same size as the stock one. The 18 isn't much thicker, but I'm comfortable losing a round of capacity for a small, even not noticeable edge in concealment when wwe're talking this size of handgun and this level of capacity.
     
  14. OregonJohnny

    OregonJohnny Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,067
    Location:
    Oregon
    Actually, that's not quite correct. I'm looking at the Mec-Gar 18-rounder next to a factory Beretta 15-rounder right now. The Mec-Gar base plate is a little rounder in lines, but is actually about 1mm shorter (top-to-bottom) than the factory Beretta mag. The Mec-Gar base plate is about 2mm wider (side-to-side), but still does not stick out any wider than the grip panels when inserted in the gun.
     
  15. OregonJohnny

    OregonJohnny Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,067
    Location:
    Oregon
    Beretta factory 15-round magazine on the left, Mec-Gar 18-round magazine on the right:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  16. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,617
    Location:
    Texas
    Hahaha.... You should go check out the Beretta Forum... There are guys there with more than me :)

    Truthfully - there is not much difference in size. While the front strap is thinner - the grips on the 1911 make the grip, as a whole, about the same width as a 1911 with standard grips.

    The slide may be a little thicker, but not by much. I used a polymer holster - using a leather holster (which is thicker than a polymer holder), I'll be that it's all about the same dimensions as a package.

    Thanks. You da man! And yea, they are variants :)

    I enjoy collecting the various models of my fav gun.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2011
  17. NG VI

    NG VI Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,884
    Location:
    Maine
    Aha, looks a little different than the 18 I remembered seeing, but it's been awhile.

    Yep I would definitely go with those 18s>anything.


    Love Mec-Gar. Golden Sabers are pretty good too.
     
  18. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,617
    Location:
    Texas
    I personally stick with 15 round mags...

    I actually discussed this on this thread last month:

    http://www.berettaforum.net/vb/showthread.php?t=71164&highlight=round

    I just look at the standard 15 round mags as tried and true through the test of time. Its been thru shorter followers, and more spring compression that they have fit more rounds in the mag. I do have several factory 17 rounders (they come with the 90-Two and 92A1), as well as a 20 round MDS mag. I have never had an issue with any at the range. But for carry, in mags lodaded for months, I am just more comfortable with the factory 15 rounders...

    You can see more comments about that in that thread...

    I haven't shot them yet - I plan to do that the first weekend of April. But, the grip lenths with the pinky extensions on the mags are around the size of an Hk P2000 or Hk USPc grip lenths. Just a tiny bit shorter than a standard 92FS.

    I received my hogue grip panels for 1 of the 92 compacts, and should get the 2nd set tomorrow. With the grip panels on and a loaded mag, they seem to balance in a 1 handed grip as well as the regular 92FS. So, I am looking forward to shooting them. I have "D" springs in both already too...

    To me, while all the railed models are super sweet - the plain 92FS has the PERFECT balance in an outstretched 1 handed grip. I have spent a LOT of time holding all of them and checking this out.

    It's irritating, because even after spending tons of money on expensive 1911s and many other guns I have bought and sold over the years - I can't find again that fits me and balances as well as the regular, non railed 92FS. I actually would kinda like to carry a 45 over a 9mm - but I like the damn 92 too much :D
     
  19. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,617
    Location:
    Texas
     
  20. IdahoLT1

    IdahoLT1 Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Messages:
    825
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    I shot my 92F next to my buddies PX4 9mm to compare recoil. Using the same ammo, I noticed the PX4 had less recoil, despite being 6 ounces lighter.
     
  21. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,617
    Location:
    Texas
    Here is another mag comparison pic the owner of the Beretta Forum made in response to a magazine question someone asked this week:

    [​IMG]
     
  22. NG VI

    NG VI Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,884
    Location:
    Maine
    Aha, that's why I thought the 18 was bulkier! I only had a Mec-Gar 17 to compare it to, with it's steel basepad!


    Thanks for the comparison, at a glance they all look very much alike besides the INOX and railed versions.
     
  23. ForumSurfer

    ForumSurfer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,057
    Location:
    NC
    Self justification, brother. I have multiple glock 19's. :)
     
  24. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,617
    Location:
    Texas
    Hahahaha :D
     
  25. tactidrool

    tactidrool Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    24
    Isn't that the subcompact? The compact has a longer grip, and no magazine pinky extension.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page