I think neither the FBI’s not Lott’s numbers can be relied upon. We do not whether the criteria use by both were the same. Since data was garnered from news reports it relies on the accuracy of the particular reporter/writer and the details fed to the media by local authorizes. As far a I am concerned that makes all the data equivalent to hearsay — we now what was said but is not firsthand knowledge. While I suspect Lott’s data is better than the FBI data, I would not quote it a definite.