Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

A new one from the anti SD crowd :(

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by WAGCEVP, Jun 23, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. WAGCEVP

    WAGCEVP Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2003
    Messages:
    864
    A new one form the anti SD crowd :(

    I got a note from a person who says we can't use the GSL over 2
    million x's a yr statement any more because " it has been proven that
    some of those are cases where the attacker wasn't armed".

    Yeah I know, where has it been proven and what the heck does it
    matter whether your attacker is armed with a gun, knife , or
    (unarmed????) with just his bare hands/ fists?


    personally to me a rapist with nothing in his hands is STILL armed!


    :what: :banghead: :barf: :fire: :cuss: :confused: :rolleyes: :uhoh:
     
  2. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Only leftist extremists or complete nitwits would fall for illogic of that sort—or do I repeat myself?
     
  3. Justin

    Justin Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    Seems to my mind that it's a valid self-defense occurence so long as one condition is met:
    An aggressor's actions are stopped because the intended victim had the presence of mind to be armed.

    It doesn't matter who the aggressor is, how big they are, or what weapons they are or are not carrying. There's no point in playing silly games where it doesn't count if the circumstances aren't just exactly how a critic wants them to be.
     
  4. ReadyontheRight

    ReadyontheRight Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,335
    Location:
    Minnesota - nine months of ice and snow...three mo
    Yeah -- Two unarmed, 200 pound rapists scared away by a little woman with a big gun just isn't fair.:rolleyes:

    The lies and "spin" these anti-freedom types spew are incredible.:banghead:
     
  5. George Hill

    George Hill Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,842
    Location:
    Uintah Basin, UT
    Being Armed is never a requirement for the justification of the use of force... its a fear of serious bodily harm or death.
    I don't know about you, but rape in my opinion is serious bodily harm. Especially when you consider the life altering STDs floating around.

    Just the this note back:


    "Moron."

    :fire:
     
  6. Geech

    Geech Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    541
    The really silly thing is that "unarmed" people kill more people each year than so-called assault weapons do.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page