A pair of my 12 gauge Sporters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Both are pretty good guns. It's a matter of fit. The 725 fit me perfectly. The Beretta not as well. When I looked down the rib on the Beretta the bead was up too high. But that is just me. I preferred the weight distribution of the Beretta, almost a perfect balance at the hinge point.
 
That's usually the case; either the Browning will fit one better or the Beretta. Brownings fit me better also, particularly BT-99's. Haven't shot a 725 yet, took a serious look at an XT at Cabela's a couple weeks ago. When the Beretta rep brought us (gun shop guys) out to Horse and Hunt to shoot Sporting Clays with the various Models, I fell in love with the 686 Onyx. They don't fit me as well as the Brownings, but I still can shoot them well.

How did you find the fit differences between the two?
The major difference I noticed is Beretta stocks are thinner throughout; Trap shooters often put an aftermarket stock, whether Stock-lock, Wenig, or PFS, on them. They are OK for Sporting Clays and live birds as is. Balance is excellent, as you said, Michael.
 
The standard SOP is simple: If the Browning fits you well, odds are the Beretta will not. It isn't a good vs bad thing; more like Ford V Chevy thing
 
The thing I hate most on the 725 is the design of the forearm. Should have been much sleeker like the Beretta. Looks like an afterthought!
 
Like my friend Bruce Buck, aka The Technoid, who reviews shotguns, I am not a fan of the Schnabel forearm; I would prefer a long slender field forearm as found on a Perazzi field gun or the Fabbri
 
Michael A Ferber

I preferred the weight distribution of the Beretta, almost a perfect balance at the hinge point.

Same with me. Never could get comfortable with the Browning Citori but loved my Beretta 680! Found a very similar fit and balance with a Franchi Renaissance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top