Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

A positive story on the AWB Sunset

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Wingshooter, Sep 10, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Wingshooter

    Wingshooter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    197
    Location:
    Fort Worth, Texas
    The local Fox station in DFW had a story on the AWB sunset; but unlike the ABC story discussed on a different thread here, it was actually positive.

    I love it when a story starts out referring to the law as the "so called assault weapon ban." They showed a pre and post ban AR and pointed out that the only differences were cosmetic. The police officer they were interviewing (from DeSoto if I remember correctly) pointed out the only difference was the flash suppressor and bayonet lug. Stated that the functional aspects were the same and that all the statistics he had seen showed that no, or very few, weapons of this sort were actually used in the commission of crimes.

    It basically showed the law for what it was, feel good legislation that is basically inneffective. At least that is the way it appeared to me. Shaun Rabb was the reporter and their website is www.fox4news.com , unfortunately they don't have a link to the story. I'll keep my eyes peeled and if I see it posted I'll forward it. I will probably send him a thank you note for the nice story as well.
     
  2. OF

    OF Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,988
    You know, I can't help but get this feeling that all this emphasis on the fact that the AWB did nothing 'substantial' or 'effective' because it was cosmetic, and the guns banned are functionally identical the post-bans is going to come back and bite us on the arse.

    It's not like it would be OK if the ban actually managed to ban military-style rifles...ugh. I understand that the angle is important as an argument against this specific piece of legislative garbage, but we have to be careful what we wish for...

    - Gabe
     
  3. Dave R

    Dave R Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,628
    Location:
    Idaho
    That was a rare and wonderful news story on the AWB. Wish the big networks had picked that one up.

    Nobody mentions the big study that was done, which shows the AWB had zero impact on crime rates. Anyone recall who commissioned that study?
     
  4. Ukraine Train

    Ukraine Train Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,233
    Location:
    Cleveland
    It was the CDC of all places. Kinda funny how even an organization that's against guns can't even prove that the law works.
     
  5. Oktagon

    Oktagon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    60
    That's a bit of good news.
     
  6. Archangel

    Archangel Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2003
    Messages:
    243
    Location:
    Maryland
    The Justice department also had a study, I want to say it was in 1996-ish, to study the effects of the ban, in which they admitted that the use in crime of guns classified as assault weapons was already so low before the ban that it fell withing the realm of statistical error.
     
  7. Andrew Rothman

    Andrew Rothman Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,669
    Location:
    MN
    The study was published in 1999 by the National Institute of Justice, part of the the Clinton-era U.S. Department of Justice. It covered 1994-1996. Read it here.

    Info courtesy of http://www.awbansunset.com, which tells us that...

    [​IMG]

    (smirk)

    ---
    i?4.gif
     
  8. williegee

    williegee Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2003
    Messages:
    108
    Location:
    Dallas,TX
    I saw that report on TV last night. I was shocked, to say the least. Shocked that they actually acknowledged that the AWB was meaningless.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page