Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

A question about modern revolver grips

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Tortuga12, Oct 28, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tortuga12

    Tortuga12 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    194
    Why is it that I see so many wood grips these days with NO checkering? Am I alone now in thinking that this provides both an improved look and grip? I just don't know what S&W is thinking these days. I love my dad's K-22, and on the Colt side his Trooper MK III, but the new S&W's just don't match up in the aesthetic quality (esp. the performance center models). Blued finish and walnut stocks all the way!
     
  2. dfariswheel

    dfariswheel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    6,120
    One big reason is cost.
    Non-checkered wood is simply cheaper than checkered.
     
  3. BobMcG

    BobMcG Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    560
    I can't think of any other logical reason off hand besides keeping costs down.
     
  4. SnWnMe

    SnWnMe Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,099
    Location:
    Inland Empire
    Well, the old stocks may look pretty but they are not the best choices for "modern technique" shooting and for controlling big boomers.
     
  5. Starter52

    Starter52 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,709
    Location:
    Northeast USA
    I'm with you, Tortuga. I have half-a-dozen pair of smooth stocks that I've taken off revolvers and replaced with Pachmayrs. I can't stand smooth wood stocks on any double-action revolver.

    But I like 'em on the 1911A1.
     
  6. srtboise

    srtboise Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Messages:
    60
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    i have smooth wood grips on my 3" m60 for a couple of reasons. first, i carry this piece iwb often and checkering is not very comfortable rubbing my spare tire for hours. second, imo the checkering sorta hides the grain of the wood and reduces the aesthetic quality of the grips.

    i dont find the gun any less controllable with the smooth wood grips vs the factory rubber grips. although, the rubber grips cushioned the recoil of 357s much better but that has nothing to do with checkering...

    steve
     
  7. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Smith & Wesson is owned by a lock company, not a firearms company.
     
  8. aaronrkelly

    aaronrkelly Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,087
    Im with you guys....


    go checkered or go home

    I do own a set of non-checkered grips for my Taurus, only becauuse I got a steal on them.
     
  9. SeanSw

    SeanSw Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    915
    Location:
    Central IL
    I find that I can shoot with almost any grip reasonably well if it is secure and not prone to slipping. Slick wooden grips, large or small, give me a some problems. Aren't bone and ivory supposed to be a little 'grippier' even when smooth compared to wood? Those look better on most revolvers than a lot of exotic woods IMO too.

    I have been shooting with people who remarked how abrasive the grip on their pistol is (twice with an HK USP) and they showed me the imprint left on their palms from the checkering. I must not grip nearly so hard as they do when shooting.

    At heart I'm a revolver man but I wouldn't choose one for primary carry, and if I did I would try to find a suitable smooth grip for an easy draw.
     
  10. Majic

    Majic Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2003
    Messages:
    5,370
    Location:
    Virginia
    To each his own, but personally I prefer smooth stocks. I really dislike checkered stocks on heavy recoiling handguns.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page