Are the actual street prices the same or different on these two rifles? If not, which one costs more?
Base Marlin runs MSRP of $340, so probably that out the door with tax.
The Stevens runs MSRP of $399. I got mine out the door for $310.
Never shot the Marlin, but I have yet to hear any substantial negative reviews on it. Mainly just personal preferences that are not liked.
I have a 200 in 300 WM. The recoil pad is fine, it could be bigger but works good enough. The Marlins definitely looks better.
Another thing, the Stevens is the absolute base rifle Savage sells, the XL7 described here is the cheapest model made by Marlin, but the only difference is the stock.
If you want to pick up a rifle that is decent priced, shoots good, and is reliable, either will do perfectly fine. But if you want to get a rifle and in the future do some possible building, the Stevens is the way to go.
Bone stock, my 200 shoots 1.5" at 200 yards, 5 shot groups. 3-9 scope.
I have since purchased a B&C stock, $72, complete detachable mag kit with the magazine, $69, and fully bedded the rifle. Added a Leupy scope mount and rings, $35. I have a sweet shooting rifle for Under $500 bucks. I did not have to buy the scope.
As for a factory bone stock rifle, I would have to give the nod to marlin for the reason of the trigger and buttpad. But the action and barrel would have to go to the Stevens. Since most people who will buy these don't care and just shoot for hunting, it really doesn't matter. But a side by side review is always nice.
Out of curiosity. What type of bedding is used in the marlin. The 200 uses metal pillars and am wondering if the marlin is the same.