Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Above the law

Discussion in 'Legal' started by k_dawg, Feb 8, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. k_dawg

    k_dawg Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    816
    Yet another example of LEO's believing in a different system of justice for their own. In this case, we have nine Chiefs of Police who believe their own are "too good" to go thru the regular system of justice as you or I would.

    I congradulate the DA for not giving into those, who believe the "thin blue line" should protect one from our system of justice.

    "Many would say that at the charging level, they (troopers) should be treated the same as any other citizen."

    Here here!


    btw: i wish that we could have in law, any LEO advocating that another LEO not be judged under the same system of justice, be irrevokably kicked off the force.
     
  2. griz

    griz Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,371
    Location:
    Eastern Virginia
    I agree with the principle that LEOs should obey the law. I also agree with Mearl Justus, the sheriff of St. Clair County, who said:

     
  3. fourays2

    fourays2 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    378
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    no-one should be charged with BS possesion laws like these.
     
  4. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    +1.

    We need to rescind The NFA of 1934. But until that happens, everyone must be treated equally under the law.
     
  5. GTSteve03

    GTSteve03 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,192
    Location:
    Cumming, GA
    Can you imagine the media frenzy if a group of 3 "civilians" were found with 3 illegal fully-automatic weapons? You'd hear the following words thrown about for sure:

    -bloodbath
    -militia
    -Columbine
    -Beltway Sniper
    -gun nuts
    -terrorists/ism

    And yet here we have higher-ups wanting to shush this whole thing and reprimand with a slap on the wrist because the offenders aren't "civilians," but law enforcement professionals. :barf: :barf:
     
  6. The Real Hawkeye

    The Real Hawkeye member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2004
    Messages:
    4,238
    Location:
    Florida, CSA
    Well, the same can be said for anyone arrested for mere illegal possession of NFA weapons. If an upstanding dentist or accountant or carpenter were arrested for it, would we actually be better off as a society with the man in jail? That's the problem with jail time, or even excessive fines, for mere possession of something. You should actually have to do something that we all agree is inherently wrong before you can go to jail, e.g., steel something, threaten someone without justification, cheat someone out of their paycheck. We can all agree that people who do those kinds of things deserve jail time, but possessing a certain kind of gun? Just possessing it? That's really insane. Any government that would do that is, well, malevolent. There's no other way to say it. And the same goes for any cop who enforces such laws.
     
  7. swampsniper

    swampsniper Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2003
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    St. Augustine, Fla
    "Every man and woman who has worn the badge has risked their life to protect others""
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Dayam, so have I, badge, or no badge!
    Where is my "get out of jail" pass?:rolleyes:
     
  8. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    It's called a might crime.

    A might crime is when you're arrested because you might commit a crime.

    There are two kinds of might crimes:

    1. There is overwhelming evidence that the action puts innocent people at consider risk of injury or death, or violates an innocent person's inalienable rights.

    2. There is very little or no evidence that the action puts innocent people at consider risk of injury or death, or violates an innocent person's inalienable rights.


    Driving while intoxicated or pointing a gun at a crowd of innocent people would fall under #1. It is usually justified to arrest someone for committing this type of might crime.

    Possessing a machinegun without NFA paperwork would fall under #2. It is not justified to arrest someone for committing this type of might crime.
     
  9. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    I think that 99% of the people who have or want a full-auto weapon do so because they have a little Beavis and Butthead in them, not a little Bonnie and Clyde.

    In New Zealand, it's fairly easy to possess a machine gun, though, oddly, open-hammer Side by Side shotguns are illegal -- no other shotguns, just open-hammers. I haven't heard that there are any problems. People just want to play with a machine gun. What sort of heterosexual man DOESN'T?:p
     
  10. swampsniper

    swampsniper Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2003
    Messages:
    280
    Location:
    St. Augustine, Fla
    Goodness gracious

    Didya ever get your thumb smacked by one of those open hammers? Goodness gracious, those dayam things are brutal!:eek:
     
  11. Kevlarman

    Kevlarman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,350
    Location:
    Los Angeles / Kern County Border
    I'd like to hear what Sideshow Bob thinks about this:

    Seriously, if anything law enforcement should be held to an even higher standard than your average Joe is, don't you think?
     
  12. 1911 guy

    1911 guy Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,484
    Location:
    Garrettsville, Oh.
    Yet another example.

    We've got the standard response here. Fellow officers, so let's sweep it under the rug. Administrative punishment for a criminal act? What would happen to "average Joe" if he were to do the same thing? Probably shot in confrontation with these fine officers.

    Just once I'd like to hear a department have the integrity to say "We expect our officers to uphold the image we present to the public. Throw the book at them." But instead we get this "thin blue line" bullsh$@. If you want me to think highly of you as a police officer, stand aside as the bad ones get dealt with, just like every other profession. If you stick with them, you're guilty as an accomplice after the fact.
     
  13. TF_FH

    TF_FH Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Messages:
    89
    [​IMG]

    Here you go swampsniper, but I dont know if your local law enforcement official will accept it. :neener:
     
  14. bigun15

    bigun15 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    491
    Location:
    California
    You idiot. The only difference between the cop and the thug on the street is that you didn't hire the thug. Not applicable to all police officers, but certainly these ones.
     
  15. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    Don't stand aside, work doubly hard to weed out the bad apples. I'm from San Diego, remember.

    And rest in peace, Cara.

    http://zyberzoom.com/CaraKnott.html
     
  16. answerguy

    answerguy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    881
    Location:
    Bay City Michigan
    I agree, I think there should be a special court set up for LEOs who try to set up special courts for their fellow members.:scrutiny:
     
  17. joab

    joab Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,830
    Location:
    Ocoee, Fla
    I believe that these cops should get off scott free

    Then they should go through their arrest records and the records of the chiefs.
    Find any arrests that they made stemming from the mere possession of "illegal weapons" and serve the time of every body that they helped to put away under the very laws that they violated.
    The falsely imprisoned should get to divvy up all their assets amongst themselves, plus be compensated the average yearly wage of all that chose to take a stand with the officers times the number of years that they served for these weapons crimes.
     
  18. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Why don't we just repeal the N.F.A. of 1934?
     
  19. k_dawg

    k_dawg Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    816
    I notice the distinct silence from those, who always complain about "cop bashing", "reserve judgement", "do not presume them guilty" etc..

    It's almost deafening.

    Why don't you stand up, and speak loudly and clearly: "If this is the law, then by god, these officers should be charged and tried just like you and I!"

    Come on, try it for once.
     
  20. Jeff White

    Jeff White Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,676
    Location:
    Alma Illinois
    k_dawg,
    They are being charged and tried just like anyone else. The US Attorney gave the correct answer. What more do you want?

    You would have reason to wear your keyboard out whining about how the man keeps the brothers down if the charges had been dropped after that letter reached the US Attorney's office. But guess what, they weren't, so this is a non issue.

    I sure hope I don't see you post any support for a private citizen who is charged with a crime. That would be inconsistant with your premise that all laws are just and should be enforced without regard to any circumstances.

    Of course we could use this as an example of just how stupid the National Firearms Act is, but then that would get in the way of all the cop bashing and wouldn't be near as much fun......:rolleyes:

    Jeff
     
  21. GTSteve03

    GTSteve03 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,192
    Location:
    Cumming, GA
    Except for the fact that the NFA has been brought up 4 times previous. But don't let that stand in the way of being a self-proclaimed martyr against all those cop bashers out there. :rolleyes:
     
  22. WvaBill

    WvaBill Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    368
    Location:
    Springtime, WV
    I would like to know, forget the NFA, how is the public safety enhanced by my being prohibited from carrying in a federal facility/National Park?
     
  23. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    If the police chiefs get their way and these 3 are not charged, there could be a chance a good lawyer would use it to get some convicts out of prison, get them to walk later for simple possession of automatic firearm.
     
  24. Huntzman

    Huntzman Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Messages:
    98
    Location:
    Illinois
    My two cents

    It's a light day, so I'll pitch in........ :rolleyes:

    I normally don't hang out here, but sometimes curiosity gets the better of me at the menu page and I take a look. I usually get a little burn going on because I'm retired NYPD and it seems that cop bashing is a budding Olympic sport. But unlike the bashers, I believe that common sense should always be employed.

    My take on this situation is simple. They broke the law, not by error which can happen, but by choice. They should face the music just like everyone else. People seem to think that cops are different and maybe they should be. But as I have said before we don't import law enforcement officers from another galaxy. We pick and choose them from Earth. That idiot you went to high school with might wind up in uniform. Newsflash, he is still probably an idiot. :what: But don't judge the rest of us. FYI: I spent twenty years in LE, and probably represent the "average" cop.

    I feel every law abiding American citizen has the RTKBA.
    I have never feared a lawfully armed citizen.
    I have never blindly stood by some lunatic chief that thought he was the poster boy for Gun Control.:banghead:
    I do believe that we as CITIZENS, one and all, of this great Nation need to support each other, not tear each other down.

    I don't think that active or retired cops have any more rights than the average person. I do believe that if we stand apart, we will all find ourselves standing along one by one. These guys were wrong, but lets look beyond this issue and address the larger one. Why are the politicians WE elect dictating through policy what rights we can and cannot exercise:cuss:

    I have no desire to shoot fully automatic weapons but I should have the right to decide that, not some bureacrat in DC. These guys broke the law and shouldd be punished accordinly, but lets not lose sight of the fact that we should be focusing on changing THAT law.

    Right now in Illinois the Chicago Dem's are looking to push another "assault weapons" ban. Some politicians, seeking to appease gun owners, have already begun to draft "grandfather" amendments. We as citizens (read: VOTERS) need to send a message loud and clear to stop the nonsense or be prepared to find another job.

    The Wall Street Journal might not agree with the Village Voice in issues of sum and substance. But raise the spectre of "freedom of speech" and see them join hands and begin singing "we shall overcome". Meanwhile, we supporters of the 2nd amendment throw stones at each other.....

    Thank you for your time and consideration of my humble diatribe !!
     
  25. joab

    joab Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,830
    Location:
    Ocoee, Fla
    Well I'm one of those that is usually being called statist lapdog for the cops, did you see my post
    That'll work too.
    If they stand up and say they broke the law because it is an unconstitutional law I support them

    If they say that they broke the law because they are cops and can't be prosecuted then screw em

    Assuming that they did in fact break the law.

    My main problem right now is with the chiefs attitude that they shouldn't even be prosecuted to find out, maybe someone should check out the chief's closets
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page