Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Aclu

Discussion in 'Legal' started by steverjo, Oct 29, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. steverjo

    steverjo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    169
    Location:
    Southern California
    Has anyone contacted the ACLU to get their support in the defense of the second ammmendment? After all, they are they are supposed to defend the individual's guaranteed rights against big government, artn't they?
     
  2. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,665
    I have....I forget if they ignored me, or gave me a form letter with the whole "COLLECTIVE" right runaround....
     
  3. Glock Glockler

    Glock Glockler Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,279
    Location:
    Southern NH
    I really think we ought to form our own version of the ACLU that recognizes the whole BoR. Why try to convert them if we can simply walk around them and start attracting serious membership?

    Perhaps Tejon can weigh in on this one.
     
  4. Neo-Luddite

    Neo-Luddite Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,990
    Location:
    Northwest IL--the other 'Downstate'
    http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html


    There are folks here at THR that have 'dual citizenship' and carry NRA and ACLU cards--nothing wrong with that.

    Read the above--the ACLU isn't interested in the 2nd. I wouldn't waste your time trying to convince them otherwise.
     
  5. Thain

    Thain Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    704
    Location:
    Lansing, Michigan
    The ACLU is focused on its speciality, the NRA is focused on its speciality, and as nice as it would be to have one stop shopping, I have no problems with either group.

    Do I like everything the ACLU does? Nope.
    Do I like everything the NRA does? Nope.

    Do I like that either organization steps up to the plate to defend what I beleive in, and agree with 90% (or more) of the time? Heck yes.

    In the grand bloody melee that is American politics, I'm going to back the guy who mostly agrees with me (ACLU, NRA, GOP) rather than concede the fight to the guy who is fundamentally oppossed to everything I stand for. (VPC, MMM, KKK, Democratic Party...)
     
  6. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Defend the rights of individuals? Ummm, no, the ACLU exists to further the cause of socialism by destroying the USA via the Bill of Rights as a battering ram against society. Hence the lack of interest in and outright hostility to the Second Amendment.

    The ICLU here is taking Indiana's voter ID law to the United States Supreme Court. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/25/AR2007092500680.html

    When I asked Mr. Falk whether the ICLU will join me in attacking the identification requirements for the purchase of firearms, I received stammering and obfruscation. Some animals are more equal than others obviously.

    The Commandments and Principles of the ACLU=>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Commandments
     
  7. dvanblaricom

    dvanblaricom Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    6
    I have learned over the past few years if I am confused on an issue to take a look at where the aclu stands and do the opposite.
     
  8. cracked butt

    cracked butt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    6,986
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    ACLU isn't interested in actual 'rights,' they are interested in supporting leftist causes.
     
  9. Jorg Nysgerrig

    Jorg Nysgerrig Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,823
    Didn't you guys get this out of your systems in the last "Hey, let's get the ACLU to support gun rights!" vs. "THE ACLU ARE GODLESS COMMIES! WOLVERINES!" thread we had just last week?
     
  10. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Wolverines!:D
     
  11. Megistopoda

    Megistopoda Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2003
    Messages:
    205
    Location:
    Kentucky
    The ACLU's official stated position is that they do not support 2A causes because, they hold, that the 2A confers a "collective right" only.

    Should the SCOTUS take the Heller case, and should they definitavely rule that yes, the second protects individuals just like we've known all along....

    ....well, then the ACLU will have to do some soul-searching, and will show it's true colors on this issue.


    To read from ACLU's site regarding the 2A, follow this link:
    http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html

    As I read that page, I kept glancing upward to ensure that I had not been redirected to the Brady campaign's site...

    It will be a pleasure to watch them revise their policy, or, to see what kind of BS they come up with to continue ignoring 2A rights...
     
  12. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    The ACLU will not change in the face of a strong pro-individual SCOTUS ruling. The SCOTUS and BoR means absolutely nothing to them.

    It is not about the Constitution; it is about their agenda.
     
  13. Megistopoda

    Megistopoda Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2003
    Messages:
    205
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Well Tejon, you might be right. If so, then they will have to shuck, and jive, and fabricate a whole litany of excuses (aka Horse-Cookies). In that event, they will take increased pressure from the educated public (like us), and thus stand to loose some of their influence.

    Then again, I am one of the optimists who sees the tide turning somewhat in the US...
     
  14. Ed Ames

    Ed Ames Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,899
    Location:
    Tejas Norte
    The ACLU has worked on behalf of gun owners many times.

    They got their real start at a time when the prevailing unacademic understanding of 2A was "collective". As more lawyers are educated in the curent "individual" 2A interpretation they will change. However, even without changing they have been on the side of many things gun owners do, or should, hold dear. Due process, impartial justice, equal protection, free speech -- the list goes on.
     
  15. buzz_knox

    buzz_knox Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,849
    The collective interpretation has been refuted by the weight of scholarly opinion for decades. The ACLU doesn't recognize this fact, nor even consider it open for discussion. It isn't likely to change, no matter what happens.

    As for the ACLU helping gun owners, when? Where was the ACLU when confiscations were taking place in New Orleans (or is the 5th Amendment meaningless as well to them?). Maybe it was too busy taking New Orleans residents before the UN. Freedom of speech? Interesting, since the ACLU helps regulate speech by threatening lawsuits unless the speech suits it. The ACLU's support of the UNC mandate that students learn about the Koran or justify their refusal to do so is a wonderful example of the ACLU's stance on "freedom" of speech and "freedom" from religion.

    Admittedly, the ACLU does some good. Of course, Mussolini made the trains run on time.
     
  16. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,665
    Does that not make them hypocrites, though?

    Remember when they had that cute little "Night Before Christmas" parody that specifically mentioned the 2A?

    If anyone wishes to educate me of WHEN the ACLU has defended the 2A, I'm always willing to learn something new.

    Until then, I'd be much happier to join them if they were UP-FRONT about their goals. Start calling themselves the A.C.L.E.S.A.U (American Civil Liberties, Excluding the Second Amendment, Union)!

    :D
     
  17. Ed Ames

    Ed Ames Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,899
    Location:
    Tejas Norte
  18. revjen45

    revjen45 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    619
    Location:
    Everett, WA
    Wolverines!! Avenge me!!:fire:
     
  19. Thain

    Thain Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    704
    Location:
    Lansing, Michigan
    Hey, look at that...

    But yeah, the majority of the ACLU is of the "collective rights" mindset... But so what? They aren't a "gun rights" nor are they a "gun control" group. I do agree with most of their stances on freedom of speech, freedom of press, et cetera.

    To me, its kind of like getting mad at the AARP for not doing enough for teenagers...
     
  20. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,665
    Well, apparently the state ACLU branches have some autonomy over the "main" one...?

    Again...ACLU *claims* to defend *all* Constitutional rights. I don't like hypocrites, the actions of a "rogue" state branch notwithstanding. If ACLU really did protect ALL of our Constitutional rights, then stories like this would be the norm, not a rarity.

    Maybe someone should sue the ACLU for "false advertising" and force them to change their name to A.C.L.E.S.A.U (American Civil Liberties, Excluding the Second Amendment, Union)!
     
  21. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,488
    I can not support the ACLU. They may be right on somethings but are wrong on many. Plus I watched their President and others of their group snicker YES I MEAN SNICKER about the 2nd amendment on C-span. They were making fun of those who support the individual 2nd amendment right. Which is ME. So they can go you know where.:fire:
     
  22. Colonel

    Colonel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    319
    I like how in one breath, they say:

    "We believe that the constitutional right to bear arms is primarily a collective one, intended mainly to protect the right of the states [BLAH BLAH BLAH] ..."

    and then in the very next breath, they say:

    "The national ACLU is neutral on the issue of gun control."

    Doesn't sound very "neutral" to me! IIRC, the whole "collective rights" revision of history is a fraud that was unheard-of before the middle of the 20th century.

    By the way, since when do states have "rights"? I thought they only had enumerated powers!
     
  23. Igloodude

    Igloodude Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2004
    Messages:
    735
    Location:
    southern NH
    The ACLU and the NRA pursue fundamentally different strategies in support of their aims: The ACLU relies on the judicial system whereas the NRA leans on the executive and (mostly) the legislative branches, though of course there are exceptions for both of them (the ACLU does lobby elected officials, and the NRA does pursue lawsuits). Their strategies reflect reality: courts have in the last few decades taken the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th amendments very seriously, moreso than general public opinion would reflect (and mostly, they use the cases where public opinion isn't on their side anyway), but most federal circuit courts have effectively ruled for a collective 2A argument, so the NRA has had little chance of winning fights there but can instead rely on a large number of motivated single-issue voters to sway legislators in ways the ACLU can only dream about.

    It should be very interesting to see what (if anything) a pro-individual 2A SCOTUS ruling on Heller will do to the ACLU's official viewpoint, and whether the NRA can or will learn from the ACLU's experience in extending the war to the judiciary branch.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page