Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Aimpoint on an Ultimak Rail (AK)- QD or no QD?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Coronach, Jul 19, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    So, I'm about to put an Aimpoint CompM2 on an Ultimak rail. The beauty of the setup is that it is lowlowlow, and you can cowitness with the irons. However, adding a QD ring raises it somewhat. My questions are:

    1. Is a QD even needed? I mean, if the batteries die, I can still use the irons through the scope. How likely is the optic to be damaged so badly you can't even see through it?

    2. What's the lowest QD mount you can get?

    3. What about this setup:

    http://www.swfa.com/pc-7732-506-aimpoint-x-wide-30mm-ring.aspx

    Any reason that would not fit the bill of being very low AND quick-detach? Sure, it might not rezero, but if I'm ditching the optic, I really don't care about rezeroing...it's probably destroyed.

    This is a semi-dupe of a thread in Accessories: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=289784

    Thanks,

    Mike
     
  2. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,536
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    If you can cowitness the irons with the non-QD, but can't with the QD, I'd say the QD ring would actually be a drawback. If you can cowitness, it makes sighting in, and verifying zero, much easier, and if the electronics go kaput at a Really Bad Time, being able to use the irons with the sight in place is a lot faster than having to move your hands to fiddle with a QD setup first.
     
  3. Mossyrock

    Mossyrock Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    352
    Location:
    The Great Pacific Northwest
    In my case, I went with a non-QD because I COULD cowitness. I lock-tited the ring on and left it at that.
     
  4. sharkhunter2018

    sharkhunter2018 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    601
    Location:
    m-burg, va
    I have the Aimpoint 30mm ring on my Ultimak (AK) and it works great. Its low enough to allow co-witness.
     
  5. Don't Tread On Me

    Don't Tread On Me Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    FLORIDA
    I use the Aimpoint ring also (not on an AK) and it is pretty much the lowest ring you can get. There might be other 30mm rings that are lower, but they won't be as wide (come as pairs for scopes).


    It might not be a return-to-zero, but it will be close. I can't imagine it being more than 1-2moa off. I have a Nikon scope that I mount and dismount from a few different AR's when I am doing load development and testing for accuracy, it has Burris Zee rings and a cheesy Yankee Hill riser rail, on/off it is never more than 1" at 100 yards.


    The Aimpoint ring is heavy duty. It also has a square post style screw that will fit snug and tight in a picatinny style rail (as opposed to a round screw). I really like the Aimpoint ring. The only thing that is better is the Larue mount, but it does not come in such a low mount.
     
  6. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    So, is the consensus that detaching the optic is not even needed, since you can see/sight through it? Or would you still set it up so that you can remove the sight?

    Mike
     
  7. Don't Tread On Me

    Don't Tread On Me Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    FLORIDA
    I like having detachable optics for different reasons. I like to take them off when I hose the weapon down with brake cleaner. I like them to return to zero or as much as possible.


    However, the idea that you'll notice "oh my God, my reddot is dead" in the heat of battle, and then detach it is crazy. Instead, you want co-witness and just start using irons. It is faster, a lot faster. The only thing that would prevent that is if you can't co-witness, forcing removal of optic, thus wasting time - OR if the optic is shattered and you can't co-witness even with irons. The thing that bugs me about screw on type detachables is that to get it tight enough to secure it to make my comfortable and confident is too tight for me to undo it with my fingers. I like throw levers better.


    That's why on an AK, I like the side rail mounts that hug pretty low but still allow irons to be used. You have to shop around for a good side rail. 90% of them are overweight bulky peices of junk. There are some good ones that are very streamlined, lightweight and high quality. They cost around $90.


    But I wouldn't be too paranoid about a shattered optic. Chances are the electronics or battery will die and you will lose the dot. Not have the glass break to the point where you can't see through it at all. Could happen, but would be rare.
     
  8. Don't Tread On Me

    Don't Tread On Me Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    FLORIDA
    Oh yeah I have one question, how hot does that Ultimak get? When I am blasting away with my AK ..that gas tube is nuclear! I can't imagine mounting an optic on that thing without frying it. I've always been paranoid about that. I can't get my hand anywhere near the gas tube due to the radiating heat. How does the optic escape the conduction of heat through the rail and ring as well as the heat wafting from the gas tube?


    Don't mean it to be a threadjack.
     
  9. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    I'll let you know. :D

    Mike
     
  10. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,450
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    I went with a Burris non-QD because I liked the extra height so that I can shoulder the rifle without having to drop my head. The heat has not proven to be an issue for the Aimpoint.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Prince Yamato

    Prince Yamato Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,409
    Location:
    Texas
    unless you have that Belarussian side-rail. Then you just flick the lever back and knock the thing off. :D
     
  12. sharkhunter2018

    sharkhunter2018 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    601
    Location:
    m-burg, va
    My Aimpoint is mounted on the Aimpoint ring. Putting several mags thru in a row, it heats up real fast, but the heat doesnt seem to have any effect on it.
     
  13. GunTech

    GunTech Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,878
    Location:
    Helena MT
    rbernie, what make of AK is that.

    For the lowest possible dot sight, you could use a Docter, JP ent or Burris Fast Fire. It mounts lower than any other dot sight, and has a built in Weaver compatible base. And it's small. I occasionally use mine on my M1A. It would be ideal for the Ultimak.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    You know, I actually think it might not sit as low as an Aimpoint. I think it is only fractionally lower than an OKO, and the OKO completely blocks the AK's irons. The Aimpoint does not.

    I'd have to check to see, you might be right.

    Mike
     
  15. GunTech

    GunTech Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,878
    Location:
    Helena MT
    Coronach,

    I'm not using mine (FastFire) at the moment, if you want to give it a try. I'd bet monet it's lower than anything else out there. With the base the sight is 1.3 inches tall. The lowest part of the optic is 0.385 inches above the top of the Weaver or Picatinny rail.
     
  16. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    Check your PMs. ;) I'm always up for trying new gear.

    Mike
     
  17. gotm4

    gotm4 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2006
    Messages:
    35
    Location:
    NoVA
    I use that same scope ring on my Aimpoint C3 on an UltiMak rail and the sights can be seen through the Aimpoint.

    I used it for the 1st Larry Vickers AK class. The UltiMak never got hot enough to burn me.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  18. GunTech

    GunTech Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,878
    Location:
    Helena MT
    Gotm4,

    I am thinking about getting another AK. Haven't kept up with who's imprting them in years. Is yours a 5.45 or 7.62? I'd like something like an AK-101 - updated AK74. I wish I could get 5.56 with plentiful magazine, as ammo would be greatly simplified.

    Thanks, Tod
     
  19. GunTech

    GunTech Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,878
    Location:
    Helena MT
    Coronach,

    PM received. Just post a review and picture of the Firesight on the Ultimak.

    Tod
     
  20. AK103K

    AK103K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    5,773
    I've had LaRue and ARMS lever mounts on a couple of my AK's. Neither would cowitness at the BSZ setting, but the ARMS could at the 400M setting on my Saiga. All of the lever mounts I've seen are made for the AR's and sit a tad high, even on the Ultimak.

    I now use the low ring from Aimpoint that you show and it works very well. Its also $25 vs. $100-150 for the others. If you really had to have it off, its off quick enough with either a coin or strong hand.
     
  21. gotm4

    gotm4 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2006
    Messages:
    35
    Location:
    NoVA
    My AK is a SLR106FR (5.56x45mm aka .223)
     
  22. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,450
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    Converted Saiga 223 using Galil mags.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page