Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Alaska follows suit...

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by goon, Jan 17, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. goon

    goon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,251
    Legislation has been introduced in the Alaska legislature to help protect the rights of law-abiding citizens from Federal infringements, should they come to pass.
    I'm just passing this along to help spread some encouragement. Keep writing letters and emails. Keep calling your representatives. Keep standing up for your rights in person and in online discussions. Send a donation to the NRA, GOA, or another Second Amendment protection group.
    But don't hang your head in despair and don't quit.
    You're not alone. Stay in the fight. As long as you stand, others will stand with you.

    Linked article:

    http://www.alaskadispatch.com/artic...t-restrict-gun-ownership-says-alaska-lawmaker

    The full text of the bill can be seen here:

    http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_bill_text.asp?hsid=HB0069A&session=28
     
  2. Ryanxia

    Ryanxia Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4,454
    Location:
    'MURICA!
    Well said. Even if you're not a member of that state, send the author of the Bill some encouragement. I did to the Congressman who authored the Bill in Wyoming. And there's nothing stopping you from donating now or at reelection time to another state's representative.

    Keep a running list of politicians who are helping and hurting us so come reelection we can get rid of them or help them stay in office.
     
  3. bigdipper

    bigdipper Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    68
    Location:
    Vermont
    This is great im going to tell my dad about this (he is a VT state senator) and see if we can get something like this to come through too
     
  4. goon

    goon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,251
    Even though the Supremacy Clause may render this kind of legislation unenforcable, it at least makes our voices heard. Maybe if half the states in the nation pass this type of legislation, Congress will hear our voices and consider alternatives that don't include depriving us of our basic liberties and right to self-defense.
     
  5. VTmtn.man

    VTmtn.man Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2012
    Messages:
    79
    To 'Bigdipper', are you being serious? is his last name Sanders or Leahy? I'm frustrated here in VT with what has been going on w/ Burlington, Barre city councel memebers. We have a very popular gun show comming up in Barre and they are enforcing obscure town ordinances to prevent private sales. Unpreccedented, prior to this. The "assault weapon" is a very bad, bad word now here in VT.
     
  6. goon

    goon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,251
    Keep writing letters. Spend $26 on a roll of stamps and use them all.
    Keep making your voices heard boys and girls.

    If you won't even speak up or take ten minutes to write a letter and mail it, then you don't deserve the rights you have as an American anyhow.

    Honor those who fought to ensure that you always have those rights, and use your First Amendment rights to voice your protests.
    We have the system in place to oppose this... now use it!
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2013
  7. Buck Kramer

    Buck Kramer Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    683
    Iowa tried passed senate, stalled in house...
     
  8. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,874
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Good, but remember these have to be passed before the fed will take them seriously. They'll need our support to get passed and signed.
     
  9. Nickel Plated

    Nickel Plated Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2012
    Messages:
    385
    That may be true but if local LE and goverment are not willing to help the feds, which is what these laws do. Then the fed laws are unenforcable. So compliance is kind of......optional.
     
  10. ObsidianOne

    ObsidianOne Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    509
    Location:
    Lake Havasu City, AZ
    Just a misdemeanor? Wyoming and another state were 2 or 4 years in prison and a felony.
    I'm waiting for Arizona to announce the death penalty or deportation for federal agents trying to enforce it lol.

    So is the Second Amendment, but they seem to be ignoring that too. Constitution > Federal Law
     
  11. goon

    goon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,251
    It may not stand in court. There is the Supremacy Clause, but laws like this if we can get them passed draw attention to the issue and they make it known that the rest of us don't want to be ruled by politicians in Chicago and NYC.

    And as noted, there is that pesky Second Amendment. This kind of law brings attention to infringements on it.
    Which is more binding - the US Constitution or some legislation?
     
  12. Diamondback6

    Diamondback6 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    807
    Location:
    The cesspool of the Upper Left Coast
    VTmtn.man, he said "STATE senator", not "US senator".
     
  13. ngnrd

    ngnrd Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2010
    Messages:
    984
    Location:
    South Central Alaska
    Just a quick update from Alaska... HB69 passed the House yesterday. The vote was 31:Yea, 5:Nay, 4:Excused
     
  14. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,983
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    It still creates a bad situation for the feds trying to enforce federal law. Even if they can't actually be arrested and charged, they'll have no local help.

    That, and Alaska or Texas really could secede fairly easily. They have the resources to stand alone (and AK certainly has the geographic isolation)
     
  15. Shadow 7D

    Shadow 7D Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    7,005
    Location:
    Frozen North
    In addition, Alaska has legal ground, as (per international law and the statehood process etc...)
    It was NEVER given the opportunity to have the 3 way vote on statehood, the option to become a full state, remain a territory OR GAIN INDEPENDENCE so, much like the independent countries that were included in the US (California and Texas) there is a technical reason to sue for independence. As for the rest, economy is dependent of federal money for infrastructure development (part of what fed money is actually for...)

    There was legitimate concern on the part of the 'not progun' side (cause being an anti is a deathknell in AK politics) on the possibility of the Troopers being in the position to be jailed for enforcing state law, and escalating that would happen. Caught a rerun of the debate, gist is, it puts federal LE in a difficult position, OK, the DEA/FBI is helping on X case, but then they have the guy on gun charges and the troopers block the case.... OR troopers get called to DEFEND a person breaking federal law...

    THIS IS THE STUFF THE CIVIL WAR WAS FOUGHT OVER
     
  16. Queen_of_Thunder

    Queen_of_Thunder member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,881
    Location:
    Where God purifies the soul. The West Texas desert
    Doing this helps to form the basis for a 10th Amendment case.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page