Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

An America without individual gun ownership: If Heller goes bad.

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by leadcounsel, Jun 15, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. leadcounsel

    leadcounsel member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,365
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    So, what are your worst case scenario predictions if Heller or other cases go badly for the 2A and the 2A is killed with the stroke of a pen?

    1. Significant increase in violent crimes, including rapes, armed robberies, home invasions, car jackings;

    2. Significant increase in police and government abuses;

    3. Significant numbers of everyday otherwise law abiding citizens being arrested for unlawfully owing a firearm and going to jail over it;

    4. Gun trafficking increases;

    5. No noticable decrease in firearm homicides;

    6. Significant increase in homicides committed with knives or other non-firearms;

    7. Significant increase in traffic accidents and fatalities from overpopulated game animals.

    Americans would be much worse off without individual firearms, and it's a simple fact that I just don't understand why the antis don't get it. The gains would be negligable at best, and the losses horrific, if guns were completely banned.
     
  2. SCKimberFan

    SCKimberFan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,229
    Location:
    South of the Mason-Dixon Line
    I prefer to wait and see the ruling first before I go into my "Oh Gawd the world is coming to an end" frame of mind.
     
  3. Eric F

    Eric F Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,934
    worry is a wasteful emotion.
     
  4. Vibe

    Vibe Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    192
    Location:
    Arkansas, USA
    We have only to wait until tomorrow, or possibly next Monday.
     
  5. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,665
    Indeed - just as I wanna see the ruling before I start dancing in the streets....

    I mean, DC isn't even technically a State, right? If the SC wants to, they can word the ruling to where - good or bad - it'll have NO effect on anyplace but DC - right?

    Personally, I'm pretty optimistic that the outcome will at the very least strike down the DC gun ban. But not too sure that it can be used as precedent to attack/prevent other future bans in the rest of the US....
     
  6. Kentak

    Kentak Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,467
    Location:
    Ohio
    You seem not to understand that an unfavorable Heller ruling would do absolutely nothing to the status quo of federal and state gun laws. Except, DC might get to keep its restrictions. Nothing else would change. New restrictions would still have to be legislated by politicians who have to answer to the electorate as usual. Those politicians who are pro-RKBA will still be so, and vice versa. You could completely erase the 2A and we could still have RKBA as long as we keep up the political struggle.

    K
     
  7. John828

    John828 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,089
    Location:
    Arkansas
    That's a little strong. I know what you're saying, but the statement is a little strong.
     
  8. La Pistoletta

    La Pistoletta Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Messages:
    601
    Location:
    Sweden
    But if they declare that "the right of the people" means the well regulated militia, couldn't that open up for some juicy restrictions in the future?
     
  9. John828

    John828 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,089
    Location:
    Arkansas
    I think the definition of "militia" has already been well covered. And the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights, where mentioning the "rights of the people" are explicitly individual rights and not collective rights.

    It would be incredibly surprising to see a ruling counter to that.
     
  10. chris in va

    chris in va Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,097
    Location:
    Louisville KY
    No, it won't. There would be a LOT of angry people protesting in the streets. I would be one of them.
     
  11. RP88

    RP88 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,704
    yea. It means that they can pass just about whatever they want against guns, up to and including total sweeping bans. Luckily, the SCOTUS judges understand english much better than the Brady Campaigners.
     
  12. Nate C.

    Nate C. Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    408
    Location:
    Tejas
    Well, depending on who you believe, crime will cease to exist, flowers will blossom and birds will sing.

    Also, Montana may secede and see an influx of immigrants.
     
  13. Tommygunn

    Tommygunn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,621
    Location:
    Morgan County, Alabama
    Too bad they don't understand their own precedent as well given last week's Gitmo decision .... :banghead:

    I hope they get Heller right .... but I'm not sanquine about it.
     
  14. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Oddly, an adverse ruling in Heller would light a fire under the firearms community and would give MCain his only shot of winning in November.
     
  15. MAKster

    MAKster Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,231
    Even if we lost Heller there would be almost no impact of the current situation. Current Federal gun control laws and the restrictive state laws are based on the belief that no individual Second Amendment right exists. If the Supreme Court affirmed such a view maybe some of the most restrictive states might add new restrictions but the states that currently have a pro-individual rights mentality aren't going to flip their view and start enacting restrictions. They would have already enacted restrictions if they were so inclined.
     
  16. jdc1244

    jdc1244 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    744
    Location:
    Florida
    True. To expand/elaborate/speculate if I may -


    In much of the South, Midwest, Free New England, and Mountain West not much would change – many states have RKBA in their constitutions. In Kali, NJ, NY, MA, IL anti-gunners would be free to press ahead with more bans and restrictions. Large metropolitan area like Atlanta/Fulton, Miami-Dade, New Orleans/Orleans Parish, etc. would be free to enact DC-like bans with Heller backing them up. The country would turn into even more of a crazy quilt of laws/bans/regulation than today – the fight would turn local, in states, counties, cities – a kind of legal urban warfare, if you will.

    The only recourse with a bad Heller ruling would be amending the Constitution with a clear, unambiguous, modern amendment guaranteeing an individual right to firearm ownership. Needless to say that would be problematic and time-consuming.
     
  17. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    jdc, not the only recourse. Plenty of Supreme Court decisions have been reversed. Dred Scott, Bowers, inter alia, etc.
     
  18. Acera

    Acera Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    3,169
    Location:
    Free State of Texas
  19. ArcherandShooter

    ArcherandShooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Messages:
    348
    Location:
    Llano, TX
    If SCOTUS doesn't get it, let's just amend the 2nd amendment to remove that pesky prefix.

    Nothing about a militia, here's the updated version, in toto:

    "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

    Even if the effort failed, we'd still have the 2A we have now.
     
  20. DoubleTapDrew

    DoubleTapDrew Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,356
    Location:
    Oregon
    Or just add a word to the first part:
    "Although a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state,..." I believe that was the original intent anyway.
    +1. There was a quote I heard somewhere that stuck with me: "Worrying is wasting energy on something before it's actually a problem"
     
  21. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,737
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    What was it that the British were marching on Concord and Lexington to seize that started the first American revolution?

    --wally.
     
  22. ROMAK IV

    ROMAK IV Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    457
    hey are right, a bad Heller decision would have no imediate affect concerning the laws, but it would have a bad one over time. First, the ruling against the 2nd Amendment would actually invalidate the Supreme Court as the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution, if it hasn't already. I doubt there will be an armed rebellion, but gun control laws are already frequently ignored, as they already are by criminals.
     
  23. H088

    H088 member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2008
    Messages:
    340
    I am confident they will strike down the DC handgun ban, hopefully much more will happen.

    They won't invalidate the 2nd, especially considering the vast majority of people in the US believe its an individuals right.
     
  24. Gunsby_Blazen

    Gunsby_Blazen Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2008
    Messages:
    392
    Location:
    ILLERNOIS
    I have been saying it all along, they will uphold the status quo. Nothing more, nothing less. They wouldn't know what else to do...
     
  25. SCPigpen

    SCPigpen Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2008
    Messages:
    109
    Location:
    Wretched Hive of Scum & Villainy
    "But if they declare that "the right of the people" means the well regulated militia, couldn't that open up for some juicy restrictions in the future?"


    If they rule that it is a collective right wouldn't the other rights go out the window as well???????????????
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page