Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Anti-Gun legislation - HR 984

Discussion in 'Legal' started by breakerilya, Jun 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. breakerilya

    breakerilya Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    24
    Just got a letter from NRA-ILA about this. If this reform becomes law, every gun owner will be registered, stored in a federal database and available on the internet for people who have access to see. What's everyone feeling on this issue?
     
  2. Erebus

    Erebus Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,374
    Location:
    North Central MA
    Like the criminals will know where to steal our guns. Bad for everyone.

    It's another attempt to catagorize us with sex offenders and shame us into giving them up.
     
  3. freakazoid

    freakazoid member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Messages:
    108
    Next stop, confiscation. :mad:

    Like a bumper sticker that I have says, "Registration, Confiscation, Revolution"
     
  4. breakerilya

    breakerilya Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    24
    what can we DO to STOP this from happening?
     
  5. pcosmar

    pcosmar member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Location:
    UP Michigan
    I remember stacking blocks in Kindergarten. Does anyone see a pattern here.
     
  6. K-Romulus

    K-Romulus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2003
    Messages:
    1,146
    Location:
    Somewhere in Monkey County, MD
    is that the right bill number?

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.984:

    It looks like an anti-lobbyist bill?
     
  7. pcosmar

    pcosmar member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    Messages:
    954
    Location:
    UP Michigan
    This would hinder grassroot political efforts, and hinder "The Redress of Grievance", by citizens.
    It is hard to tell the full implications.
     
  8. skinnyguy

    skinnyguy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2007
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    Tooele, Utah
    Perhaps you are referring to H.R.1874.IH?
    `Technological Resource to Assist Criminal Enforcement (TRACE) Act'.
     
  9. breakerilya

    breakerilya Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    24
    <quote> `(b) Contents of Record and Report- Each record made, and each report filed, under subsection (a) shall contain--

    `(1) the name of the covered executive branch official;

    `(2) the name of each private party who had a significant contact with that official; and

    `(3) for each private party so named, a summary of the nature of the contact, including--

    `(A) the date of the contact;

    `(B) the subject matter of the contact and the specific executive branch action to which the contact relates; and

    `(C) if the contact was made on behalf of a client, the name of the client.</quote>

    In other words when you go to buy a gun... your name will be stored in a federal database. Any lawyers here who can interpret this?
     
  10. Telperion

    Telperion Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Oregon
    I don't see that this has anything to do with guns. :confused:
     
  11. Grey54956

    Grey54956 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    632
    Location:
    IN
    Throw another log on the fire.

    Should it pass, which it probably will not, would it lead to confiscation?

    If it did, would confiscation beget civil disobedience?

    Would civil disobedience beget martial law?

    Would martial law beget revolution?

    I wonder what would happen.
     
  12. jpk1md

    jpk1md Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Messages:
    620
    Sponsor: Rep Andrews, Robert E. [NJ-1] (introduced 4/17/2007) Cosponsors (None)

    Technological Resource to Assist Criminal Enforcement (TRACE) Act (Introduced in House)

    HR 1874 IH

    110th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    H. R. 1874


    To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to require microstamping of all firearms manufactured in or imported into the United States, and ballistics testing of all firearms in the custody of the Federal Government
    .

    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    April 17, 2007

    Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

    A BILL

    To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to require microstamping of all firearms manufactured in or imported into the United States, and ballistics testing of all firearms in the custody of the Federal Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Technological Resource to Assist Criminal Enforcement (TRACE) Act'.

    SEC. 2. BAN ON MANUFACTURE OR IMPORTATION OF FIREARMS THAT ARE NOT MICROSTAMPED.

    (a) License Revocation- Section 923(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the penultimate sentence the following: `The Attorney General shall, after notice and opportunity for hearing, revoke the license of an importer who imports into the United States a firearm that is not microstamped, or the license of a manufacturer who manufactures a firearm that is not microstamped or a microstamped firearm that does not transfer the array of characters constituting the microstamp onto the cartridge case of any ammunition fired from the firearm.'.

    (b) Definition of Microstamped- Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

    `(36) The term `microstamped' means, with respect to a firearm, that etched into the interior surface or internal working parts of the firearm is an array of characters which identify the make, model, and serial number of the firearm.'.

    SEC. 3. BALLISTICS TESTING OF CRIME GUNS; COMPUTERIZATION OF RECORDS.

    (a) In General- Section 923 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

    `(m)(1) The Attorney General shall conduct ballistics testing of any firearm in the custody of the Federal Government if there is reason to believe that the firearm has been involved in a crime under Federal or State law, and establish an electronic database containing records of the results of the testing.

    `(2) The Attorney General shall establish a computer system through which State and local law enforcement agencies can promptly access the ballistics records stored under this subsection.

    `(3) Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this subsection, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report regarding the implementation of this subsection, including--

    `(A) the number of Federal and State criminal investigations, arrests, indictments, and prosecutions of all cases in which access to ballistics records, provided through the system established under this section and under similar systems operated by any State, served as a valuable investigative tool in the prosecution of crimes involving firearms; and

    `(B) the extent to which ballistics records are accessible across jurisdictions.

    `(4) There are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General $20,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 2009, to carry out this subsection.'.

    (b) Definition of Ballistics- Section 921(a) of such title, as amended by section 2(b) of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following:

    `(37) The term `ballistics' means a comparative analysis of fired bullets and cartridge casings to identify the firearm from which bullets and cartridge casings have been discharged, through identification of the unique markings that the firearm imprints on cartridge casings of ammunition fired from the firearm.'.
     
  13. BBQJOE

    BBQJOE Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    736
    Location:
    ARIZONA
    No guys it's like this:
    Not only do they want all registered gun owners listed on a public web site, they also want to make it public every time you write, call or email anyone in the executive branch of government. ie president, senators etc.
    They will post your info, who you wrote and what you said.
     
  14. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,665
    I got the letter - it's HR 984.

    Here's where I see the problems NRA mentions:

    I don't see any "limiter" to JUST gun owners, either...maybe ACLU will help layeth the smacketh down on this one...?
     
  15. jselvy

    jselvy member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    518
    Isn't gathering the information in order to post it de facto registration?

    Jefferson
     
  16. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,665
    Bump, for more opinions...?
     
  17. alligator94

    alligator94 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Messages:
    86
    Location:
    WV
    Call me stupid, but I don't see anything about a national gun registry?
     
  18. eric_t12

    eric_t12 Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2007
    Messages:
    172
    Location:
    SD
    I dont necessarily see anything about a national gun registry,

    but i do see a registry of everything i say to my congressman, which even in the MILITARY, if you don't violate UCMJ, is protected.

    If you can't speak out to your congressman, whether they listen or not - freely - what is there left of government?
     
  19. jselvy

    jselvy member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    518
    Nothing

    Jefferson
     
  20. Erebus

    Erebus Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,374
    Location:
    North Central MA
    This is about stopping people from contacting their congress critters about controversial topics. It's about making people think twice before trying to tell the ruling class what the peasents want. It's about intimidating you into not calling or writing your representatives.

    The less they hear from you the more they like it because they can just do what they want.

    Always remember to tell them that you always vote and that you will never vote for someone that is in opposition to your views, what ever they may be.

    This is a very bad bill for everyone that isn't in Congress.
     
  21. K-Romulus

    K-Romulus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2003
    Messages:
    1,146
    Location:
    Somewhere in Monkey County, MD
    Two things:

    (1) Executive Branch (White House/DOJ/etc.) is different from the Legislative Branch(Congress).

    Viz.:
    and:
    (2) "Lobbying contact" doesn't normally seem to include Joe Q. Public:
    This bill does seem to get rid of that pesky "on behalf of a client" language in the definition of lobbying contact, but it may cut both ways. Wouldn't we want to officially know if Attorney General Grab-em-all had a lot of meetings with the VPC staff?
     
  22. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,665
    K-Romulus - I looked up the definition of "lobbying contact" but was a bit confused...

    So if it's NOT "lobbying contact," it's not for public review.

    But could responding to an NRA, or GOA, or ACLU, or NumbersUSA, or yes, even the Brady Campaign "action alert" be seen as "making contact on behalf of a client?"
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page