Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Anyone have or use any Redfield scopes?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by SilentStalker, Jun 18, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SilentStalker

    SilentStalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,281
    Location:
    Somewhere in the U.S., London, or Australia
    If so, can you tell me how they compare to say Burris? I was really wanting to get a lower power scope for one of my new AR's, something in the 1-4x range but then I seen and have read a lot about the Redfield's and it seems like a 3-9Xpower range might be good to have even thought it was a little longer than I preferred. However, if I mount one of those alongside a red dot then that might work. I have an opportunity to get one at a really reasonable price. Originally, I was looking at the MTAC by Burris and then found out about the Redfield which seems to have rave reviews. the only thing I do not like about the Redfield is that it does not have an illuminated reticle but again if I mount it next to a red micro dot then that will be a mute point anyways. Decisions, decisions. It seems like the more I research the more I cannot make up my mind.
     
  2. Jlr2267

    Jlr2267 Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,209
    Location:
    South Carolina
    On sale at Cabelas, and there is also a manufacturer rebate running thru early July.

    Everyone I know who has one likes it. Thinking of picking up a 2-7x33 myself.
     
  3. Safety First

    Safety First Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    751
    Location:
    Middle Georgia area
    I have two 2-7x33 Redfield ACURange scopes. One mounted on a 6.8 SPC AR15 and another on a 5.56 AR15. The glass is clear and love the acurange reticle.
     
  4. TexasPatriot.308

    TexasPatriot.308 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,310
    Location:
    Luling Texas
    I have a 2x7x33 on a mini 14 tactical and it is as good as scope as any comparable Leupold (which it is made by), Nikon etc. good clear glass, gonna get me another to put on a .257 Roberts M77 I am waiting on.
     
  5. wingman

    wingman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,185
    Location:
    texas
    2-7X33 mounted on a mini-30,very clear glass,no problems.
     
  6. mberoose

    mberoose Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2012
    Messages:
    338
    Location:
    CT
    My buddy has a Redfield Revolution 3-9x40 (I think) on his Mini-14 that I like a lot, I'd put it up against a Burris, sure. Nice scope.
     
  7. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    Thinking about putting a 3x9x40mm on my Savage 30-06, very very good reviews and the glass seems as good as my Nikons.
     
  8. mnrivrat

    mnrivrat Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,612
    Location:
    MN
    Current Refields are made by Leupold and are of very good quality.

    We have sold a bunch of them out of the shop and absolutely no complaints.

    I remember one customer indicating he replaced his Leupold with one because he thought it to be clearer. Unless you get a rare bad one, you will be more than fine.
     
  9. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,091
    Location:
    Georgia
    I have both. The Redfield is a good scope, but the Burris is a much clearer and sharper scope to my eye. I like the long range dots better on the Burris vs the too busy circle and dots on the Redfield. It is a bit distracting when looking trough the scope.
     
  10. Sav .250

    Sav .250 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,405
    Location:
    Central Fla
    Can`t compare the two as I`ve never owned a Burris. As far as Redfields go (the old ones) I put one on a Marlin 336 in the 60`s . Got it sighted in and to this date.......never a problem.
     
  11. Davek1977

    Davek1977 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,464
    I have a revolution 2x7x33 on an AR-15 and love it! No complaints!
     
  12. JoeMal

    JoeMal Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,569
    Location:
    TEXAS
    I have heard this as well...though I've never looked through one myself, I hear very good things about them
     
  13. rayatphonix

    rayatphonix Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    Messages:
    354
    While I can't compare the new Redfields to anything, I do have 2 older (80's or early 90's) Redfields. Last Friday I took two rifles to the range. One had an old 4x12 Redfield and the other had a year old 4x16x44 Nikon Monarch. When I switched rifles I was surprised at the difference it made.

    I asked someone else if they could see a difference. Both of us agreed the Redfield was much clearer than the new Nikon. That's not what I expected at all. My next scope will probably be an used Redfield rather than a new Nikon.
     
  14. MIL-DOT

    MIL-DOT member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    3,110
    Location:
    Georgia,C.S.A.
    I can't say myself,( I only have a Leupold MKIV PR, Bushnell Elite 4200 and Weaver V-series) but virtually everything I've read on the Redfields has been very positive. I would have no qualms at all about getting a Redfield.
     
  15. kcshooter

    kcshooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,274
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    My Redfield and Leupold have no discernible difference in clarity or quality.
    My Burris is **slightly** clearer than my Redfields, if push came to shove.

    Both are impressive.
     
  16. T.R.

    T.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,561
    Location:
    Manatee County, Florida
    Back in 1972, I bought a used Redfield 2x-7X for $45. for my .243 rifle. It started fogging up in 1991 although zero was not affected at all. I sent it to the Bushnell factory for repairs which cost me $37. and its been fine ever since. In my opinion, modern scopes by Simmons and others are brighter and clearer than my older Redfield scope.

    The NEW Redfields have much better optics than my older model. Pricing is quite reasonable considering inflation and devalued USA dolllar.

    TR
     
  17. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,091
    Location:
    Georgia
    The Redfield Revolution is essentially a Leupold VX-1 or Rifleman in a different package. Same warranty, roughly same weight, same eye relief, same glass, but with a cheaper price tag. Leupold has upgraded their scope lines twice within the last 10 years or so. If someone had one of the older Vari-X models then the newer Redfield would probably be a slight upgrade.

    If you compare the Redfield to a current production Rifleman or VX-1 you are getting the same scope. Move up to a current production VX-2 or higher and you will see a difference.

    The older generation Leupolds were the Vari-X line
    They were updated about 10 years ago to the VX-II or III with roman numerals.
    The newest versions are the VX-2 or 3 with arabic numbers
     
  18. captain awesome

    captain awesome Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    Messages:
    917
    Location:
    Mesa, AZ
    I Have used one on a 243 to take an antelope. never had a problem with it.
     
  19. Jeff H

    Jeff H Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    1,304
    Location:
    Ohio
  20. Haxby

    Haxby Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    993
    The Leupold Rifleman has single-coated lenses.
    The Redfield Revolution is multicoated. The Revenge is fully multicoated.
    The new Leupold VX1 is fully multicoated.
    Above information is from the 2012 Leupold catalog and the Redfield website.

    I see no reason to spend over $100 on a scope that is not fully multicoated.
     
  21. fol4321

    fol4321 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    126
    i have 2 older oners wich are great and 3 newer 4-12 and they are great for the price i like them better than prostaffs
     
  22. JR24

    JR24 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    627
    Location:
    The center of the mitt
    Like em.

    Got 2 4x12's and a 2-7. Great glass, good in the REAL cold weather of AK and hold their center just fine even while bouncing around the tundra on a snowmachine. I can't ask for much more.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page