Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

anyone think Ruger would be wise to enter the DI AR-15 market?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by migkillertwo, Jul 14, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. migkillertwo

    migkillertwo Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    279
    My reasoning behind this is thus; Ruger already has a CHF press and has had one for a long time (Their mini-14s are cold hammer forged). I'm thinking that they could undercut a lot of other vendors by selling reasonably-priced AR-15s (700-800$ per unit) that have cold hammer forged barrels.

    EDIT: Um...for some reason, some people failed to read "DI" in "DI AR market"

    I'm talking about "Direct Impingement" ARs, the SR-556 is a short-stroke piston AR-15
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2010
  2. killchain

    killchain Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    780
    Location:
    Washington State
  3. NCsmitty

    NCsmitty Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,325
    Location:
    North Carolina
    What do you call the Ruger SR-556?



    NCsmitty
     
  4. fireside44

    fireside44 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    746
    Nothing to be gained in a saturated market. I don't know how anyone could come in and undercut the AR market right now unless they were giving them out free.
     
  5. 1KPerDay

    1KPerDay Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    12,476
    Location:
    Happy Valley, UT
    The Ruger 556 is not a Direct Impingement gas operated AR-15.

    To answer the OP's question, no, IMO.
     
  6. DoubleTapDrew

    DoubleTapDrew Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,356
    Location:
    Oregon
    That's too hard of a market to enter right now especially for a D.I. gun. Their piston SR556 can at least cash in on the people that think piston guns are better.
    Now if they got rid of the hughes amendment and brought back the AC-556 I'd be all over it! ;)
     
  7. Carl N. Brown

    Carl N. Brown Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    7,812
    Location:
    Kingsport Tennessee
    A lot of people make direct impingement ARs and apparently do it well. If Ruger makes a good piston action AR, they would be wise to do what they have done well with other successful models: concentrate on a good product, and gradually improve it, at a competitive price, without radical flavor of the month changes.
     
  8. benzy2

    benzy2 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,386
    I don't see why they wouldn't go DI as well. Honestly, with their volume, they could make a decent rifle and keep in the $700-$800 base model range. The additional parts required to make a DI AR rather than a piston AR wouldn't be much. The real question is would they price their piston rifles out of the market if they offered an affordable DI AR?
     
  9. Quentin

    Quentin Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,826
    Location:
    NorthWest USA
    Probably not wise for them since they're pushing a more expensive piston model. A DI Ruger might eat into SR-556 sales. It would be interesting though - to see what Ruger could offer but I doubt they'd do it since it might really hurt the Mini-14 as well.

    With the Mini-14 at the entry level and the SR-556 at twice that I think Ruger would be foolish to introduce a cheap DI AR.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page