Anyone using RG4895 Surplus powder

Status
Not open for further replies.
counterclockwise,
Are your velocity predictions good?

Velocity we can measure 4 digits for great verification.
Pressure, most of us just get 1 digit equivalent with primer pocket growth.
 
I've loaded a lot of the RG4895 powder in 7.62 x 51 and gotten very good results in ny M14. Yes there's more flash but it's not a problem for me. I have used 43.5 gr behind 147 gr FMJBT and I don't have the numbers in front of me but I think I got right at 2700 fps with that load. For casual plinking for my wife I load 42.0 gr with the same bullet. Functions the rifle fine. She likes the semi mode but not FA.:p
 
That is why I am adjusting the energy density a bit. The predicted velocity using the IMR4895 model was higher than actual chronographed average of 5 I know we are admonished not to fool with powder characteristc files, but going from 4080 to 4000 kJ/Kg is only a 2% change and it fixed the velocity error.

The other thing I tweaked was starting pressure. My rounds are not crimped in, and the 168 gn projectile I am using has no cannelure, so I thought their standard 3856 should go down to about 1000 psi.

I left the other characteristics alone except solid density. I was trying to match beam scale weights and bullet lengths to % of case fill, which I had measured carefully using H20 and weight.

I wanted to get some feedback from others about the change to see if that was kosher. As you know RG4895 does not have a powder characteristic file. Its source is Radway Green pull which could have come from a bulk powder lot, not canister grade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top