Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Are BR4 primers worth the extra cost?

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by karnaaj, Nov 9, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. karnaaj

    karnaaj Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    200
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Oh
    Been reading on the net recommendations on using BR4 primers instead of standard small rifle primers but sheesh, $15/box more?
    Right now the only thing I'm loading rifle wise is .223.
     
  2. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    IMO: No, they are not worth the cost for normal reloading requirements.

    Of all the things that can go wrong with your reloads that effect accuracy, Bench-Rest primer selection is pretty far down the list.

    [​IMG]
    rcmodel
     
  3. Don't Tread On Me

    Don't Tread On Me Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    FLORIDA
    I got a bad batch of them. One shot in a string would go 200fps faster than the rest. Thought it was me until an author in Handloader Magazine discovered the same thing when testing small rifle primers (in .223).
     
  4. langenc

    langenc Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Messages:
    921
    Location:
    Montmorency Co, MI
    Depends what the resulting ammo is being used for but generally NO.
     
  5. Cougfan2

    Cougfan2 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,731
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Unless you are a true bench rest shooter they're not worth the money. for most rifles that are used for hunting or plinking, you're just not going to see much difference.
     
  6. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,673
    Location:
    Alabama
    During the primer shortage (the real one) quite a number of years ago many Benchresters went to Winchester standard small rifle primers when we could not get Federal Match primers. Most said they could not tell the difference and some never went back to Federal Match primers once they were available again.
     
  7. ocabj

    ocabj Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,383
    Location:
    Riverside, CA
    I use CCI BR4 in my competition loads and CCI 400 in my practice loads. I've never really done any comparison check as far accuracy or velocity consistency, but I also use a different upper for practice than I do in competition. It's about $10 more per 1K brick, and I do it more for peace of mind.

    If you want a good BR primer, then get Remington 7-1/2. The only reason I don't use them is because they are always in short supply, especially in the past year and a half.

    Winchester primers are fine, except I have experienced more frequency primer piercing and primer cup/anvil separation when loading ammo with them for the AR. That's why I switched to CCI (for small rifle - AR).
     
  8. dcloco

    dcloco Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Messages:
    319
    no...absolutely, without a doubt...NOT worth the extra money.
     
  9. Grumulkin

    Grumulkin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    2,560
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    A recent Handloader Magazine article documented improved accuracy with bench rest primers. Remington small rifle bench rest primers were better than the CCI & Federal versions so they're what I'll be using.
     
  10. GaryL

    GaryL Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,178
    Location:
    MN
    Does Remington advertise in that particular handloader mag? Not saying they are biased, but hot rodders have known for a long time that auto rags have a strong tendancy to bias results towards their advertisers. It's not that the data is bad, but the test conditions often favor the featured product.
     
  11. dcloco

    dcloco Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Messages:
    319
    I have a couple hundred targets and chrono printouts, that indicate BR2's, BR4's, Rem 7.5's, 9.5's, etc, etc....are actually less accurate and consistent that Fed 205, 205M's, CCI 250 & 450's.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page