Varminterror
Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 17,719
20 years ago
~25 years ago, I paid 59¢/gal for gas every Thursday morning, with 79¢/gal regular price. I paid $150 for my Nokia cell phone, and paid $27/pair for wrangler jeans. In 2002, I rented a 1400 sqft 1 bedroom apartment on the top of a split level house at just under market value for $300/mo (their list was $350/mo) from a family friend who had bought the house for their daughter. Wanna compare that to 2025 pricing? $150 for the phone doesn't pay for even 1/4 of an iPhone 16, even the inflated price of $150 in 2000 would only be $276 in 2025, but the basic iPhone 16, the current market base model akin to the Nokia 3310 in 2000, is selling for $850. Inflating gas from 79¢/gal would be $1.46/gal today, and I sure would rather pay that than the ~$2.75/gal I'm paying this month - and in 2000, we weren't buying E10 at that price, that was <E5, which is selling today over $3.25/gal. Our friends still own that rental house, they have it rented at $750/mo today, which is $130 more than inflated $350/mo. In 2000, a dozen eggs was $1 including tax, which SHOULD be $1.77 today, but instead, we're paying just under 50¢/egg, and a dozen is on the shelf at $4.90...
30 years ago, young people didn't have the inherent cost of cell phones and didn't live in a society where home internet service was necessary, and weren't paying product pricing ahead of inflation based on the mistakes of generations before them.
THIS calculus is the reason why I suggest against firearms as investments. It's incredibly rare to find firearms which actually appreciate ahead of inflation over time. Guns are cheaper than ever, but living isn't.