Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Are new production Ar's too heavy?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by natedog, Oct 28, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. natedog

    natedog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,634
    Location:
    Bakersfield, California
    I was just thinking about this while brousing the Bushmaster website...the fullsize A2 weighs almost 8 pounds. Is this too much for a 5.56mm rifle? Has the trend of heavier barrels defeated the purpose of the lightweight rifle? The same goes for military M-16's. Is the heavy barrel a blessing or a curse?
     
  2. capt_happypants

    capt_happypants Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    304
    I think the 20" A2 HBAR is way too nose-heavy for my taste, and I much rather prefer a carbine with a 16" HBAR or M4-profile bbl for better handling.

    It doesn't get any better in the armed services. I've seen M4A3 carbines with so much tactical gadgetry dangling off that a 20" HBAR would be positively pleasant to lug around.
     
  3. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,950
    Location:
    Utah, inside the Terraformed Zone
    Remember, the 20" military barrel isn't nearly as heavy as the heavy ones on the commercial guns.

    The M16A2/A3/A4 handle fairly well, actually. Don't like 'em as much as my FAL, though.
     
  4. Skofnung

    Skofnung Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,135
    Location:
    Atlanta Area
    When I got my Bushy A2 20" I had hopes of my girlfriend learning to shoot a centerfire rifle with it. No dice when it comes to offhand. It is just too muzzle heavy for her tiny (and I do mean TINY) arms.

    Oh well, I guess I will have to break down and get a 16" lightweight carbine for "her." Yhea, it will be for her... :evil:
     
  5. Redlg155

    Redlg155 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,724
    Location:
    NW Florida
    The standard heavy barrel guns? Yep...But then it is cheaper to manufacture. I had a Bushmaster Shorty w/ Ak brake that was pretty heavy for a short rifle.

    On the other hand there are many new production guns that have lightweight and M4 profiles that feel just fine.

    I don't think that it's the weight as much as the balance of the rifle. The heavier barrel just makes it feel heavier than it actually is.

    Good Shooting
    Red
     
  6. CWL

    CWL Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    6,505
    When you look at the rest of the world's main battle armaments, the M16/M4 family of rifles still comes in as a lighter weapon.

    Most other battle rifles/carbines weigh in excess of 8lbs (unloaded), most weigh better than 4kg (8.8lbs).

    Also take into fact that our combat troops should be in shape, plus, all of our units are motorized/airborne except during combat operations.

    If you really are concerned, you can get a light barrel config.
     
  7. Telperion

    Telperion Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Oregon
    Bushmaster has a post-ban 20" A2-profile barrel. Think it takes off at least a pound.
     
  8. Rob96

    Rob96 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,504
    Location:
    Allentown, PA
    I like the balance and feel of my DPMS Classic Sixteen with its 16" HBAR.
     
  9. TechBrute

    TechBrute Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,264
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    When did 8 lbs. become heavy for a rifle? 18 maybe...
     
  10. wanderinwalker

    wanderinwalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    1,964
    Location:
    SW NH
    I agree with TechBrute! 8 pounds is not that heavy! ;) Try an M-1 Garand, M-98 Mauser or even a 1903 Springfield if you want heavy. My target AR weighs about 11-ish pounds right now, with it balanced right at the mag-well, so it doesn't feel too bad up and running. And yes, the military M-16A2 does weigh less than a commercial HBAR. At least that's what my Marine armorer buddy tells me.
     
  11. BigG

    BigG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    7,081
    Location:
    Dixieland
    Colt SP1

    The original configuration was best. You could hold it by the pistol grip and the nose wouldn't sag. Try that with an A2/HBAR. Ha!
     
  12. Steve Smith

    Steve Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,394
    Location:
    Southeastern US
    "too heavy" is subjective

    The AR fills so many niches now once can't paint all of them with the same brush. My competition ARs are "too heavy" for combat, but the lead comes out in about 2 minutes. My Cav-Arms lightweigh carbine feels like a child's toy by comparison. Each has their purpose. "Too heavy" does not exist as long as "sporting purpose" is undefinable. Thankfully, you may still purchase a rifle with "no sporting purpose" as well.
     
  13. BigG

    BigG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    7,081
    Location:
    Dixieland
    I guess I can put it like an economist and say, "it depends." Y'all know where my preferences lie, anyway. :D
     
  14. Jaywalker

    Jaywalker Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2003
    Messages:
    894
    Location:
    Texas
    I don't care for the HBAR configuration. I went with the 16" Bushamster HBAR to avoid some of the muzzle-heaviness of the 20-inch. It did relieve some of that, but I found I didn't care for the muzzle blast of the 16-inch, either, so I sold it.

    Jaywalker
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page