Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Assault Weapons: Dangerous in Whose Hands?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by WAGCEVP, Oct 22, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. WAGCEVP

    WAGCEVP Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2003
    Messages:
    864
    Assault Weapons: Dangerous in Whose Hands?


    http://www.wbay.com/global/story.asp?s=1491688&ClientType=Printable

    By Jeff Alexander

    Aric Tonn used a semi-automatic AK-47 assault rifle to kill Deputy Bruce Williams in Green Lake on Sunday. In 1994, Congress passed a law making it harder for people to get assault weapons. Congress banned the manufacture of guns considered assault weapons, and gun stores can no longer import them.

    Still, thousands of these weapons are on gun store shelves because Congress grandfathered any weapon made before 1994.

    The ban is scheduled to end next year unless Congress and President Bush agree to renew it.

    No surprise, we found strong opinions on both sides of this issue. Some feel assault weapons are nothing but a threat to society. Others feel owning them is their constitutional right.

    Butch Williquette is in the gun business. At On-Site Gun Company he buys, sells, and defends what he does for a living. "I got an AK-47 over there on the wall and it hasn't assaulted anybody yet," he points out. "You put anything in the hands of a killer and he's going to kill."

    Wisconsin state law puts very few restrictions on semi-automatic assault weapons:

    State law treats the sale and possession of assault rifles much like hunting rifles
    Background checks for assault rifle buyers are not as extensive as the checks for handgun buyers
    Owners are not required to register their guns with the state.

    Williquette believes in the motto "Guns don't kill people, people do."

    Not everyone agrees. Pastor Kay Krejci of Union Congregational Church feels assault weapons give people -- sometimes dangerous people -- the feeling of power, and that has to stop.

    "It doesn't speak well for our society. It's not a healthy situation," she said. "I think it's appropriate for us as a community to say we don't need or want assault weapons in our homes."

    Police tend to agree. They say weapons like an AK-47 possess too much firepower for them to handle.

    "The number of rounds you can fire in a short time with a hunting rifle versus a semi-automatic AK-47 is quite different," Green Bay police Lieutenant Jim Arts said.

    Those favoring the ban say it has to get even tougher because gunmakers are simply modifying models to offer customers weapons almost identical to those that are banned.

    Recent studies by the U.S. Department of Justice found no evidence that banning assault weapons reduced the number of gunshot victims.

    "Granted, in the wrong hands they're very dangerous, but so is that car you just drove up in," Williquette said.
     
  2. Travis McGee

    Travis McGee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,790
    Location:
    NE Florida
    Surprisingly fair article. At least they let our side get in a few points.
    This subject is going to keep moving to the center of discussion for the next year. I just hope there is no "super Colombine" to give the gun-grabbers ammunition.

    [​IMG]
     
  3. C.R.Sam

    C.R.Sam Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,632
    Location:
    Chino Valley, AZ., USA
    Yup, decent article.
    And, Williquette came off as a rational person.
    Pleasant change.

    Sam
     
  4. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,679
    Fair balance is all we can ask of the media.
     
  5. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    I hope I never need to dial 911 in Green Bay.
     
  6. Dorian

    Dorian Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Messages:
    547
    Really? All police? Or just the ones that get quoted in the paper?:rolleyes:

    edit:

    thr article certianly was balanced, but this part stood out to me.
     
  7. tyme

    tyme Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,550
    Location:
    Novalis
    [blockquote]Background checks for assault rifle buyers are not as extensive as the checks for handgun buyers[/blockquote]
    Is this true in any state? Sounds like someone got confused, which I'll grant is easy with all the intricacies of firearms transfers.

    And any police officers who feel their assault weapons or other firearms are too powerful should feel free to send them to me.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page