Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

At 500yds would you?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by CSestp, Nov 13, 2008.

?

5.56 or 7.62x51

  1. 5.56

    8 vote(s)
    9.1%
  2. 7.62x51

    80 vote(s)
    90.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CSestp

    CSestp Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    265
    Location:
    Tulsa, OK
    Would you rather be shooting 5.56? or a 7.62x51? Take in mind I don't plan on hunting paper.
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2008
  2. Tarvis

    Tarvis Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,178
    Location:
    Northern Pennsylvania
    If you aren't hunting paper, we need to "take in mind" what you are hunting to objectively answer your question.
     
  3. chriso

    chriso Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    484
    Id rather use 7.62 x 51 than going past 400 with the .223 not saying its not capable just saying my 308 is more capable :)...
     
  4. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5,884
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    The .308 was designed to be a highly accurate long-range round. The .223 was designed to be an accurate medium-range low-recoil battle rifle round. Long story short, the .308 is far more suited to such long range shooting. It retains effective stopping power and accuracy at ranges far exceeding that of the .223. I would not consider the .223 to be appropriate for hunting beyond 200 yards, and not more than half that for larger game like deer.
     
  5. Monkeybear

    Monkeybear Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,178
    If your buying the ammo, I want 7.62 NATO. If I'm buying I want 5.56.

    I assume you meant that you are not hunting, just punching paper. If thats the case I would go cheap.
     
  6. Kind of Blued

    Kind of Blued Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,676
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    What is this supposed to say?
     
  7. Auburn1992

    Auburn1992 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,015
    Location:
    Tennessee
    crap. Thought that 7.62x51 was x39 :banghead: otherwise, wouldn't have voted for the 5.56.
     
  8. woof

    woof Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,571
    Location:
    central Ohio
    At 500 yards I'd get closer.
     
  9. 627PCFan

    627PCFan Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,001
    Location:
    Sterling, VA
    Although this thread sketches me out,

    5.56 @ 500 yards on varmints= Money :D
     
  10. Kymasabe

    Kymasabe Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Messages:
    833
    Location:
    Northern by birth, Southern by choice.
    No brainer. I'd take .308 over .223 any day of the week...especially at distances over 200 yards.
     
  11. Appsy

    Appsy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Location:
    Where ever my hats hanging in Australia
    Im with chriso and Mike the Wolf. 5.56 can be accurate out to 900 yards with a 1 in 6.5 to 9 twist and 90gn projectiles. however for reliable accuracy and humane kills on anything larger than a varmint at 500 yards go the 7.62x51
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2008
  12. db_tanker

    db_tanker Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,772
    Location:
    Willis, TX
    7.62...for sure.
     
  13. Dumptruck

    Dumptruck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    155
    What are you hunting? Wildlife or an elusive ex-wife? I don't want to end up in the clink for giving you bad ideas.
     
  14. cerberus65

    cerberus65 Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    296
    If you're hunting paper then either will do. If you're hunting something else then .223 is only adequate for small critters. The .308 would work for either.

    Unless you're already an expert marksman, be sure to hunt plenty of paper at that distance before you actually start shooting at game out that far. It would definitely be the ethical thing to do.
     
  15. expvideo

    expvideo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,720
    Location:
    Everett, WA
    At that range, I'd rather just try not to be noticed and get:
    a)closer
    b)further away
    depending on what I'm shooting at.
     
  16. cracked butt

    cracked butt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    6,986
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    The 7.6x51 really doesn't have much in the way of accuracy advantages over the 556. At 500 yards, unless you are shooting nothing bigger than coyotes, I'd opt for something with much better ballisticsthan the 7.62x51 for ethical humane hunting.
    I'll be blunt and honest- if you have to ask, you have no business shooting anything but paper at 500 yards, or even 1/2 that range.
     
  17. CSestp

    CSestp Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    265
    Location:
    Tulsa, OK
    oh and you were born with this information cracked butt? this is the problem with some people on this forum, bunch of elitest. Sorry for trying to learn. Wont ever make the mistake of asking a stupid question:banghead:. To be blunt and honest.

    Thank everyone else very much.
     
  18. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,379
    Location:
    TN
    That would be my reasoning as well. But it depends on what you are hunting. The 30 caliber bullet will do better wind drift wise at long range than the .223. But if you are shooting prarie dogs, I certainly wouldn't choose a 308.

    I'm still learning myself. Can't know everything.
     
  19. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    22,321
    If you are shooting at anything besides wild animals and paper, your Sergeant will give you the caliber you need.

    Otherwise, I'll take the .223 because at 500 yards I will not be shooting at anything but paper or varmints. I don't consider that a sporting shot on big game. No doubt everybody else is a better shot than me.
     
  20. JackOfAllTradesMasterAtNone

    JackOfAllTradesMasterAtNone Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,441
    Location:
    Lynden, WA
    CSestp, Dude, Chill out...

    Cracked Butt offered some good advice. Along with others that asked 'what you're hunting/going to be shootin at'. His answer was not 'elitist' at all. It was sound advice to a question that was a bit vague. Not a stupid question, but a bit vague.

    -Steve
     
  21. CSestp

    CSestp Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    265
    Location:
    Tulsa, OK
    Thats your opinion to hold as mine is mine. Ether way I found out what I needed to know. Once again thank you for the information.
     
  22. offthepaper

    offthepaper Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,436
    Agreed.
    Sorry to the original poster, but the question was at least a bit vague. Giving a good, honest, informative answer requires a little more info than was given in the question.
    Not trying to flame you CSestp, but on this or most other forums, the more detailed info given in the question will result in a more informative answer.
    Now, deep breaths....
     
  23. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,265
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Yup. And since CSestp is happy, I'm happy. :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page