Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

ball vs. stick 5.56\.223

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by judge, Mar 25, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. judge

    judge Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    5
    A relative who served in army infantry in Vietnam told me to stay away from ball(MIL) ammo in my AR because it gunks up the action quicker? I'm aware that just because the military uses something doesn't mean its necessarily the best:confused:and my old timer's memories are of those early issue M-16A1s but is there any validity to what he's saying? I've used both types and while stick-powder ammo seems to be a little more accurate, does consistently using the ball stuff cause more hassle?
     
  2. NG VI

    NG VI Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,884
    Location:
    Maine
    In Vietnam things were a little different. The rifle was originally designed to be used with stick powder, the Army had it loaded with ball powder because they had a bunch on hand or it was cheaper, probably both, and they also, more importantly, did not issue the rifle with cleaning supplies or manuals. And they told troops that they didn't need to be cleaned at all.

    Perfect storm going on right there. Both the rifle and knowledge of how to work it have come a long way since it was first issued in the early-mid sixties.
     
  3. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,536
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    It's probably a moot point these days. Modern 5.56x45 milspec ammo is probably just as clean burning as civilian .223. I think this was a Vietnam-era problem that is no longer applicable today.
     
  4. tju1973

    tju1973 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2008
    Messages:
    471
    Location:
    Texas
    Yeah-- the M16 (especially the first versions fielded) were not issued out with Grunts in mind-- The US beta tested them in a hostile environment..and teething problems ensued.. I have confidence (or had with mine) that my A2 would work anywhere --Just so long as I did my part...
     
  5. Taurus 617 CCW

    Taurus 617 CCW Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,596
    Location:
    Northern Idaho
    Have your bolt group ceramic coated and you won't have to worry about what powder you use.
     
  6. Tirod

    Tirod Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,316
    Location:
    SW MO
    He's right - for what he learned in the 1960's. Things change. It's no longer a problem.

    Interesting report just surfaced on a carbine used by an instructor as a loaner - after 25,000+ rounds, they finally got around to cleaning it. Literally. It had seen parts replacements as things broke, but it was never cleaned, just lubed and handed out when a student's gun broke down. It was been shot at the rate of about 1,200 rounds a weekend.

    Of course, even if was a certified test by Consumer Reports, some folks would still scoff.
     
  7. GRIZ22

    GRIZ22 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    4,908
    I have been using AA2230 since 1988 in 223. Being a ball powder hasn't been a problem shooting a few hundred rounds per session. I can't say it's dirtier than stick powder and have used it in a variety of semi autos (mostly ARs) with no problems. I use ARs, M16s, and M4s since 1968.

    Cleaning your gun after you shoot it is the easiest way to avoid malfunctioning.
     
  8. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,763
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    Didn't they change the powder again(along with chrome lining the chamber and issuing cleaning kits) after they had problems? Does recent production (from the last decade or two) M193 even use ball powder anymore?

    Don't confuse "ball ammo" with ball powder. Two different things.

    "Ball Ammo" is slang for any military FMJ.
     
  9. cougar1717

    cougar1717 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Messages:
    728
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    I have used both ball and extruded (stick) powder in 223 Rem. My experience is that extruded powder is more accurate than ball powder and slightly cleaner, all other things being equal but this is a non issue if you clean you gun semi regularly. OTOH, ball powder is much easier to work with when charging cases.
     
  10. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    I have used nothing but WW-748 Ball powder in AR-15's ever since I started loading for them in 1970.

    No problem.

    Most comercial .223 & military 5.56 NATO is loaded with ball powder today.

    Here is the story on Vietnam era powder issues.
    http://www.thegunzone.com/556prop.html

    rc
     
  11. Doug Kennedy

    Doug Kennedy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26
    Location:
    RFD Illinois
    My ARs like N133.N135,H335 and ww748 just fine
     
  12. stubbicatt

    stubbicatt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    3,413
    Location:
    Colorado
    IIRC, it was calcium carbonate in the Vietnam powder that clogged up the gas tube.
     
  13. briansmithwins

    briansmithwins Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,060
    Yep. Winchester was re-manufacturing old artillery ammo into ball rifle powder. They added the calcium carbonate (chalk) to neutralize the acids from the old powder decomposing.

    Of course, chalk is a bad thing in gas tubes.

    BSW
     
  14. Runningman

    Runningman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,230
    Location:
    Northwest
  15. Shawn Dodson

    Shawn Dodson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,293
    It's not slang, "Ball" is official U.S. military terminology. I've been unable to locate a specific definition for "Ball" but it appears to define a common, FMJ lead core bullet, e.g., M2 Ball, M80 Ball, M193 Ball, M855 Ball, Caliber .45 Ball, M882 Ball, etc.
     
  16. Redneck with a 40

    Redneck with a 40 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,273
    I prefer extruded powders, I really like IMR-4895, accurate and clean.
     
  17. wcwhitey

    wcwhitey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,010
    I have been told and don't know for sure but wasn't the original Stoner loadings based around IMR 3031?

    Anyway, it's a bit of extra work having to trickle every charge but I have good luck with 3031 in my .223 loadings.
     
  18. DougW

    DougW Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,057
    Location:
    North Texas
    I use H335 and AA2230 (both ball powders) for the most part in .223, but I have also used Varget, IMR 4064, and IMR4895 (stick) in the .223's. It works fine. The ball powder meters better for me.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page