Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ballard rifling?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by SteelyDan, Sep 22, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SteelyDan

    SteelyDan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,108
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I don't really understand how Ballard rifling differs from conventional rifling, and what that means for shooting lead vs. copper-coated bullets. Any help would be appreciated.
     
  2. mete

    mete Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    3,579
    Location:
    NY
    The Marlin website has a forum that goes into this in detail. Their microgroove rifling was critisized for not being accurate with lead bullets .The micrgroove has more grooves but they are shallower.They can be just as accurate but the bullet hardness and diameter are more critical. The ballard rifling is deeper though has fewer grooves and is less critical as far as diameter and hardness of the bullet. These are just two of many types of rifling that have been developed.
     
  3. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,966
    Modern Marlin Ballard rifling IS conventional rifling; six grooves, probably .004" deep or thereabouts. Contrasted to the UNconventional Marlin Microgroove rifling with 12 to 20 grooves maybe .002" or .003" deep.

    I have not been able to find dimensions for REAL Brown or Marlin Ballard rifling of the 19th century. But according to Roberts and Waters, even then it was deeper cut than Sharps rifling and better suited for "grooved" bullets than Sharps which were usually, though not always, loaded with paper patched bullets.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page