Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ballistic gelatin test results (07MAR07) - 9mm Luger Golden Saber

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Brass Fetcher, Mar 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brass Fetcher

    Brass Fetcher Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,685
    Location:
    Eastern border of the United States
    Firearm : Recoil-operated semi-automatic with 4.02" barrel length

    Ammunition : Remington 147gr Golden Saber JHP

    Block Calibration : All depths are corrected depths (590 ft/sec @ 10.7cm)

    Shot 1 : Impacted at 993, penetrated to 14.5" and had an average diameter of 0.618".

    Shot 2 : Impacted at 982, penetrated to 14.5" and had an average diameter of 0.612".

    Shot 3 : Impacted at 981, penetrated to 14.5" and had an average diameter of 0.622".

    Shot 4 : Impacted at 959, penetrated to 14.5" and had an average diameter of 0.627".

    Shot 5 : Impacted at 962, penetrated to 14.5" and had an average diameter of 0.613".
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Joe D

    Joe D Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2004
    Messages:
    275
    Location:
    Alabama
    The results would be more meaningful if you shot through heavy cloth first. There are many rounds that perform wonderfully when shot into bare gelatin, but fail to expand when fired through cloth. Most bad guys tend to wear clothes unless they attack you on the beach.
     
  3. tnieto2004

    tnieto2004 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,382
    Is this a joke?
     
  4. GuidoTorpedo

    GuidoTorpedo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Messages:
    118
    Location:
    Spring Hill, TN
    No, heavy cloth (i.e. Denim) represents the target wearing clothes. HPs can clog and not expand when shot through "clothing" and draping cloth over bare gelatin can simulate this.

    But if you're trying to test all HPs on the same level for comparison, then there is no need to throw a variable (i.e. cloth) in there to skew results.
     
  5. daysleeprx

    daysleeprx Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    723
    Location:
    Texas
    Adding cloth would be a confounding variable...not all bad guys wear the same jeans (or whatnot).
     
  6. strat81

    strat81 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,912
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Very consistent results. Thanks for testing JE223!
     
  7. grimjaw

    grimjaw Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Messages:
    3,358
    Location:
    Arkansas
    The results would be more meaningful if you shot through heavy cloth first.

    Lots of hollowpoints won't expand reliably if they get debris in the cavity. Is your complaint against his site in general or just this one test?

    Among the complaints I hear about 147gr 9mm is that it isn't going fast enough to expand reliably and will overpenetrate. In this test it seems to work just fine, with both good penetration and expansion.

    jm
     
  8. DogBonz

    DogBonz Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,068
    Location:
    NJ
    Never under stood the denim thing

    As a kid I read *WAY* too many gun magazines, and as a result, I did a lot of “tests” with my pellet gun and my 22 rifle. Now, I know that the tests that I did were in no way, shape, or form scientific. Also, I don’t know if what I “discovered” in my tests would translate in any way to handgun rounds, but my results were consistent within them selves, so it tells me that my “data” was good.

    In said tests, I noticed that some things would indeed stop (or reduce their performance) pellets and bullets better then others. I found out that heavy cloth, like denim or canvas worked well, but cotton (like shirt material) hardly effected bullets.

    I just don’t understand the denim tests be cause most of the time, people are wearing denim on their legs, and shirt material over their vitals. Also, if we are testing this to prove a bullet through a jacket, why don’t we test leather? More people wear leather jackets than denim jackets, at least around here.
     
  9. GunNut

    GunNut Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,075
    Location:
    Washington State
    Very nice consistent results, looks like it would be a very good heavyweight carry load.
     
  10. skinnyguy

    skinnyguy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2007
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    Tooele, Utah
    THANKS JE223

    Looks like that would be a viable candidate for my round of choice for personal defense. Really consistent results and predictable penetration!!
     
  11. RyanM

    RyanM Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    4,412
    Location:
    PA
    Standard 147 gr Golden Sabers (not bonded) have an excellent reputation for expanding reliably after passing through heavy clothing. They're really absolutely the only round I would be willing to carry, if I owned a 9mm.

    Excellent performance, on par with many .40 S&W loads (of course, the .40 S&W 180 gr GS, my personal favorite, perform about as well as many .45 ACP loads).
     
  12. Feanaro

    Feanaro Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,661
    Location:
    Leeds, AL.
    The denim test is not designed to simulate actual clothing. It's just to gauge performance. The logic goes that if it expands despite the denim, it is almost certain to expand when the horse manure hits the fan blades.
     
  13. the naked prophet

    the naked prophet Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,237
    Location:
    MO
    Come to think of it, I would really like to see tests comparing the expansion of a known round (say, this one tested here) through various media including heavy denim, puffy winter coats (that are inexplicably in fashion year round in some cultural circles), and a leather jacket.

    The results might be quite different depending on the round tested. I wonder if someone couldn't get a grant to test all this stuff?
     
  14. Stephen A. Camp

    Stephen A. Camp Moderator In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,430
    Hello and thanks for the post. I appreciate your efforts in both doing the work and posting the results with photographs.

    Best.
     
  15. Brass Fetcher

    Brass Fetcher Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,685
    Location:
    Eastern border of the United States
    You're welcome

    Hehehe. I don't know about grants - I don't know if my website qualifies as politically correct - mind you, lots of guns and I even dared once to have a picture of George Washington at Valley Forge on there. .gov won't make it happen, that's for sure! :)

    I can do a test like that - since I'm setup for gelatin, there's no ~ 1000USD startup fee for the equipment... just the gelatin block and the fabric and the ammo. :)
     
  16. DirksterG30

    DirksterG30 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    625
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Thanks for posting that, JE223. I too would be interested in the demin results.

    I think this is earlier-generation hollowpoints. It is true that hollowpoints are designed to expand over a certain velocity range, but ammo manufacturers are now using bullets that expand well at the velocities they are designed for. Look at .45ACP hollowpoints - they go about 800-950fps (if I remember correctly), and they expand just fine.
     
  17. universal

    universal Guest

    Thanks for sharing the test results with us.
     
  18. saltydog452

    saltydog452 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,705
    Thank you.

    salty.
     
  19. waynedm

    waynedm member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    408
    Thumbs up to 147 grain.
     
  20. SnakeEater

    SnakeEater Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    770
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    <----Most appreciative for your work.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page